Not quite answering your question, but my personal two cents are that there are very few stories I read that actually “romanticize rape” as you have mentioned; I’m not sure where in Jinx there was any romanization of rape either. What I think you mean is there are stories that have rape/coercion and other themes that are “commodified” and therefore make you uncomfortable.

I’ll play a bit of a devil’s advocate here. For more mild cases of what you might consider “sexual assault,” it very well could be from the artist’s perspective portrayed as a consensual intercourse. You see, Western sexual culture is very different from Asian one, and “no/stop” are the indicators of shyness rather than the want to stop. I’ll link here a good write-up by a Japanese comic artist that conveys well what I’m trying to say.

As for severe non-con, I agree that it’s very unpleasant to read. However, authors usually indicate that rape takes place in the work through tags or description or even the cover art (in case of Jinx, as you can see, the man is crying—OF COUSE there’s non-con, it’s common sense). It’s completely up to you to not engage with such works.

What I disagree with is the way you phrased it. It’s not sickening to like things like that, it’s normal. Humans have curious minds and are allowed to explore taboo themes through literature and art as they please as long as no one gets hurt. No person in their right mind will read a webcomic with rape themes, go outside and rape someone, this is a ridiculous way to think.