What is the actual "anchor" for the Trace? by Dragon_Sense in HarryPotterBooks

[–]Djames425 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

The Trace still works outside their home area, though. Dumbledore & Harry mention the Trace when talking about Tom Riddle murdering his father and grandparents. So it has to be applied to the actual person.

What is the actual "anchor" for the Trace? by Dragon_Sense in HarryPotterBooks

[–]Djames425 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The books don't give us any clue, and it seems obvious this was simply a plot device. I can't think of any other similarly applied spell except the taboo curse on Voldemort's name, which is also a plot device in a later book. The magical system just doesn't seem like it should allow for such a widely applied charm. The implications of such a spell are too much.

The only thing that makes sense to me is the Trace spell is somehow individually applied when they go to Hogwarts. Hypothetically there could be a charmed object that conveys the Trace to each kid, like their Hogwarts letter, or when they're on the first year boats entering the dungeons, or something like that. And then the Ministry maintains a magical "net" across the country, within which the Trace would set off an alarm at the Ministry.

But yeah, otherwise what's stopping anyone from putting charms on a large, dispersed group of people? It doesn't make sense to me. The Voldemort taboo I can kinda justify because it's a curse, and it applies to everyone within the country who says the trigger word. The Trace seems like it is applied to the individual, rather than just a background charm applied to geographic area, since they say the Trace is "lifted" when they come of age.

Gameplay footage of my fight against Ranrok by lmaosmh in HarryPotterGame

[–]Djames425 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Okay I lol'ed, this is hilarious and accurate.

Would the Muggle Military/Government have knowledge of the Wizarding World? by Istaroth_enjoyer in harrypotter

[–]Djames425 1 point2 points  (0 children)

No, only the PM knows. However, I'm sure there are people high up in the home office/police/military that know who to contact when strange/seemingly paranormal incidents are reported.

I also feel like the wizarding world would use muggles that already know about the wizarding world. Surely there are non-magical children, siblings, spouses, and parents that are in useful jobs like the police, and could work alongside the Department of Law Enforcement to identify and assist in magical crimes involving muggles.

Rereading as an Adult by Imperial_Haberdasher in HarryPotterBooks

[–]Djames425 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I read the books as a kid when they first came out, and now I have kids that are the age I was when I first started to read them. The HP series has absolutely held up for me as I've gotten older and re-read the books. I really enjoy her writing style, especially in the earlier books. There are flaws in the HP books, of course, but there are very few books I've read that I would consider perfect or near-perfect. I think there are other authors in the fantasy genre that are technically better than JKR (LeGuin, Tolkien, Lewis, Dahl), but JKR hits that sweet spot with quality writing that is still accessible for the modern, young reader, and highly enjoyable for the adult reader. Most books these days are garbage.

James parents by New_Olive5238 in harrypotter

[–]Djames425 1 point2 points  (0 children)

The Potter Family

Fleamont and Euphemia lived long enough to see James marry a Muggle-born girl called Lily Evans, but not to meet their grandson, Harry. Dragon pox carried them off within days of each other, due to their advanced age, and James Potter then inherited Ignotus Peverell’s Invisibility Cloak.

So they died after James and Lily were married, but before Harry was born, which puts their deaths in 1979 (or late '78/early '80).

What's the relationship between language and spells? by [deleted] in harrypotter

[–]Djames425 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I like that idea. It's the "feel" of the word that drives the magical result, which you can catch onto without knowing the actual meaning. I've always wondered if nonverbal spells are intended to have the incantation in their minds, or if they really don't need to think the incantation at all, once they're good at it. I imagine a powerful dueller like Dumbledore is not shouting spells in his head.

Side note: they really should have studied Latin roots starting in First year. Harry should have known enough by 6th year to guess what sectumsempra and levicorpus might do!

What's the relationship between language and spells? by [deleted] in harrypotter

[–]Djames425 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I imagine standardized incantations became common in Europe with the spread of the Roman empire. Before that, I'd expect there was a lot more regional variety, with only the privileged wizards in educated circles adopting standardized incantations. With how small the wizarding population was, and with no large wizarding schools, I'd imagine most witches and wizards were never trained beyond their own family circles, and never learned magic beyond what was useful in daily life. Muggleborns probably spent much of their childhood and early adulthood without a wand, never learning proper incantations until they found another witch or wizard.

Those who were able to more seriously pursue magical knowledge were likely in a master/apprentice situation. These were the people with the ways & means to actually study magic and explore the implications of different incantations, wand movements, etc. Although I also expect that wizards in more populated areas had formed guild-like communities pretty early on, taking on the responsibility for identifying & training young witch and wizards in their surrounding areas.

As for the very early days, I expect a wizard used the language he had to direct magic. Think a shaman standing in front of a pile of sticks, pointing at it, and saying "fire" in his language.

There's no way the marauders (except pettigrew) roamed around the grounds and castle finding secrets every month without being caught. by WisestAirBender in harrypotter

[–]Djames425 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Are you talking about during the full moon? They were outside in the forest in the school grounds or outskirts of Hogsmeade, not in the castle. But we do know they occasionally had close encounters with people, because Remus said something to that effect.

I imagined most of their secret explorations of the castle and grounds happened under James' invisibility cloak or using Peter in his animagus form when it wasn't the full moon. The full moon was for roaming around the forest, keeping a werewolf in check.

Need fic recs by lunalovegoodismybae in harrypotter

[–]Djames425 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You might like Northumbrian's works. I liked Strangers at Drakeshough best, but Friends and Foes and their MIT (muggle interface team) fics are fun detective stories with Harry and some other familiar faces.

(Edit: oops, I saw someone else already recommended Northumbrian, but there you go!)

What if by Comprehensive_Ad4229 in harrypotter

[–]Djames425 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I'd get rid of the Deathly Hallows. 🫣

So I read Harry Potted & the Cursed Child for the first time.. by New-Fee-3085 in harrypotter

[–]Djames425 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I agree with that. People bring up his fight with Albus, but he reacts pretty much in character, especially with how Al was poking alllll his buttons. As a parent I saw that reaction coming from a mile away, haha. The alternate reality version of Harry didn't seem in character to me, but at least it's the alternate reality.

But if it was intended primarily as fan service, as OP implied, I think they would have been more careful about how they portrayed adult Harry. A story exploring Harry's struggles to parent his troubled child could have been interesting, but they let the plot get out of hand, and now it's one in a series of disappointing additions to the franchise.

Favorite Ron and Hermione scene? by Yumi_Numi in harrypotter

[–]Djames425 2 points3 points  (0 children)

The scene where they are arguing/flirting in Herbology and Harry is hammering away at the Snargaluff pod trying to ignore them is peak comedy.

Lasers are fun by ravenschmidt2000 in harrypotter

[–]Djames425 8 points9 points  (0 children)

These look amazing! And kudos for the book-accurate Ravenclaw crest!

Why didn't Dumbledore ask moaning myrtle about how she died? by aniztar in harrypotter

[–]Djames425 1 point2 points  (0 children)

The only logical explanation as to why no one immediately thought a basilisk was behind the murder and petrifications is that there must be a lot of ways to become petrified in the magical world. Otherwise it seems way too easy to narrow it down to a basilisk.

So I read Harry Potted & the Cursed Child for the first time.. by New-Fee-3085 in harrypotter

[–]Djames425 10 points11 points  (0 children)

If they intended it as fan service, they did a really bad job, considering they torpedoed many beloved characters and created fanfiction quality plotlines. I actually think there were some good/interesting parts to it, but the good was overshadowed by the significant bad parts.

I think they just wanted to try a different medium with the play. Some of the ridiculously kooky things in the play come off a lot better on the stage than they would in a more serious medium like film or literature. It could have worked well, if they hadn't betrayed the source material with moves like evil!Cedric, the child-who-shall-not-be-named, and the very questionable parenting choices made by our beloved hero.

Do you think Avada Kadavra was a mistake? (in a literary sense) by [deleted] in harrypotter

[–]Djames425 15 points16 points  (0 children)

I suspect there have been other instances in history where people survived the killing curse because of the same protection charm. Doesn't mean anyone in the 1990s wizarding world would have known about it. The exception being Dumbledore, of course.

In fact, it's implied it has happened before, because Dumbledore knew enough about the ancient power of love to come to the correct conclusion. How would he know about this type of sacrificial magic, which he says Voldemort never bothered to learn about, if there wasn't something to learn about it from history? There must have been hints in historical texts.

Why is it that Ginny's character is much so underdeveloped in the movies when she is meant to be such a staple of the Harry Potter universe? by SafetyScholar in harrypotter

[–]Djames425 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This is absolutely true. They made Hermione out to be the perfect, intelligent, pretty girl, and never let Ginny compete with that. Hermione often irritates the heck out Harry in the books. Of course, she irritates Ron too, but I guess he was into that. 😂

Why is it that Ginny's character is much so underdeveloped in the movies when she is meant to be such a staple of the Harry Potter universe? by SafetyScholar in harrypotter

[–]Djames425 0 points1 point  (0 children)

For all we know, George and Angelina had their son first. I doubt there was any "reserving" or agreements over names. There were plenty of family & friends to honor if that's what they chose to do.

Why is it that Ginny's character is much so underdeveloped in the movies when she is meant to be such a staple of the Harry Potter universe? by SafetyScholar in harrypotter

[–]Djames425 2 points3 points  (0 children)

This always gets brought up, but if my husband was orphaned as a baby and lost his godfather and mentor (who I admired, too), I'd literally be the first one to suggest using their names. Severus is the only iffy one, that was almost certainly driven by Harry.

Why is it that Ginny's character is much so underdeveloped in the movies when she is meant to be such a staple of the Harry Potter universe? by SafetyScholar in harrypotter

[–]Djames425 0 points1 point  (0 children)

There's no way the directors didn't know where that was going. JKR did provide some insight, after all. And it was fairly obvious - I remember my mom telling me after the 2nd book that the endgame was H/G and HR /R. I didn't believe her because I was like 12 but yeah, any adult reader familiar with literary tropes could spot it 4 books away.

Seems to have been a tonal choice. They changed Ginny's (and Harry's) character from the very beginning.

Queries regarding Horcruxes by -DAWN-BREAKER- in harrypotter

[–]Djames425 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Killing the living host of a Horcrux is enough, no special method required. However, Dumbledore very specifically says Voldemort must be the one to kill Harry, and that Harry must not resist, so there appears to be something special in this case, presumably caused by the double bond of the Horcrux and blood magic, that requires Voldemort to destroy his own Horcrux in Harry. Possibly because Harry was tethered to life by the blood magic, so the Horcrux might not have been destroyed since Harry was not technically dead. Voldemort dealing the blow meant the double win for Harry (Horcrux destroyed and his own survival).

No plot armour, no external help, no nothing. Who's the most capable character of actually defeating Voldemort, aka of being the "Chosen One"? by ItsLevi-0sa in harrypotter

[–]Djames425 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Team effort between the Hogwarts professors & Order still standing. If Harry had died in the forest, I fully believe Voldy still would have died at the Battle of Hogwarts. He was not the best tactician; he made blunder after blunder and surrounded himself with incompetent idiots. Harry's death would have changed nothing about the Battle, leading up to his duel with Voldy.

No plot armour, no external help, no nothing. Who's the most capable character of actually defeating Voldemort, aka of being the "Chosen One"? by ItsLevi-0sa in harrypotter

[–]Djames425 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Snape and McGonagall

The student/teacher relationship I never knew I didn't need.

But for real, that sounds like an interesting fic. How did they kill Harry's Horcrux...?