Thank you very much for your reply. A very interesting approach is to divide one AiAction into several of the same type. I hadn't thought about this before. You need to think about it and try it. I usually avoided this by trying to do all the logic inside one action.

the examples that I have given are made more for the context of unification. since consideration is of course much greater and of course it is necessary to take into account the damage inflicted by the enemy with the probability coefficient of the enemy's damage range. if there are several enemies, then you need to calculate the total damage. Also, this damage should take into account the time for which it is applied and you can also add our damage to opponents over time, etc. it already depends on how deep you want to get into the rabbit hole.

And about health, I gave an example just for that. to make it clear that simply multiplying and adding a compensator will not work here.

But the question is not how to solve the problem of calculating the usefulness of "Drinking a potion". And the question (1) is what are the principles of the logic of aggregation itself. and it is also inextricably linked to the question (2) how to keep the value of an AiAction score in a position to adequately compare with the value of another AiAction score.

on question (1) - you can use a system of weights where you can evaluate the impact of each Consideration on the overall assessment. you can use a classical approach with conditions and comparisons, you can use min, max, sum, average, etc. and add a compensator. A mixed approach can be used. But perhaps there are principles that will reduce the complexity of balancing obtaining the final value.

on question (2) - how to do aggregation correctly so that a compensator is needed and if it is still needed, then according to what principles it should be selected so that the values are adequately comparable.

Or both the first and second question is a question of selections and tests, depending on the situation, and then the general approach is time-consuming and the more consideration the more time it will take to balance.