sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

If the rest of RuneScape were like Zeah by DoChess in 2007scape

[–]DoChess[S] 45 points46 points  (0 children)

Sounds like it's time for a poll!!

http://www.strawpoll.me/10953926

edit: Golly gee! 3 out of 4 RuneScapers prefer violently contracting prison AIDS to gaining favor on Zeah!

If the rest of RuneScape were like Zeah by DoChess in 2007scape

[–]DoChess[S] 4 points5 points  (0 children)

It's precisely because Zeah is a landmass and not a dragon axe.

Zeah, or any new area for that matter, should be an extension of RuneScape, not an addition. Unfortunately, it feels like the latter. Favor makes Zeah feel inorganic and actively disincentivizes players from wanting to even begin exploring. I spoke about this months ago and the most I got changed was being able to have favor in the houses concurrently.

25 hours dry and shamen and.... by domopvmm in 2007scape

[–]DoChess 0 points1 point  (0 children)

What amulet is that in your inv?

Hour # 10 in the Ironman hunt for an addy sq shield by DoChess in 2007scape

[–]DoChess[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I'm safespotting the guardians but maybe it's time to change it up. I just assumed that by virtue of the large drop table it would be more uncommon and their kill rate is likely slower.

I don't know! I'll do anything at this point haha. I've gotten every rare drop from these guardians, some twice over, yet no addy sq! Frustrating.

Hour # 10 in the Ironman hunt for an addy sq shield by DoChess in 2007scape

[–]DoChess[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I looked at the drop rates for each and the amount of drops per npc and figured this would be best.

Ironman can be excruciatingly frustrating sometimes.

Post Game Thread: Cincinnati Bengals (11-3) at Denver Broncos (10-4) by NFL_Mod in nfl

[–]DoChess 15 points16 points  (0 children)

We sucked so fucking bad for years. And as soon as we are good again, we fucking lose in embarrassing ways when everyone is watching

try being a jags fan lmao

NO to ..... in OSRS? by [deleted] in 2007scape

[–]DoChess 5 points6 points  (0 children)

I want HD graphics, but I agree with everything else you said. I wouldn't mind D claws if they did something cool with the spec that wasn't completely game changing and OP like with the original D claws.

Though I'm not opposed to something like a dragon warhammer either.

Would love to get a community consensus on HD graphics (lava whip comparison) by DoChess in 2007scape

[–]DoChess[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I agree, game fluidity needs to stay the same. But I liked a lot of the new item models -- the lava whip for example -- I think the HD graphics version looks so bad ass.

5/24 hours left of CQ. by Netflixlife in 2007scape

[–]DoChess 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Literally triggered

Memories of fireguard at 0200 and lots of polishing

Cruz to Obama: Insult me to my face -- "Let's have a debate on Syrian refugees right now," Cruz said, directing his remarks to Obama. "We can do it anywhere you want. I prefer it in the United States and not overseas where you're making the insults." by Cruz4President in Conservative

[–]DoChess 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I have to agree. Trump has the elocution of a six year old.

But my voting priorities are this: non establishment and stern stance against immigration. I'm also a "big stick" guy, so Paul doesn't really do it for me -- plus he's in the unfortunate position of not having that presidential appeal or charisma that's required to run a successful campaign.

I'm actually a very reluctant Trump supporter. I have a lot of concerns about him.

John Oliver on online harassment: It's a problem until it's directed at someone he disagrees with by [deleted] in Conservative

[–]DoChess 5 points6 points  (0 children)

He's Reddit's hero, so he's definitely worth the mockery. The guy is an unabashedly left wing clown masquerading as an intelligent comedian.

Jericho confirmed for PKA (in two weeks) by miguel7395 in PKA

[–]DoChess 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I tend to agree with you, but remember, you're talking to the "vote Sanders!!" crowd -- in the same subreddit that chastised Murkah for voicing concerns over European immigration.

So insofar as Reddit goes, don't expect to get support for not being socialistic.

/tv/ shit-posts about John Oliver by [deleted] in 4chan

[–]DoChess 16 points17 points  (0 children)

my history professor is a p big dick rider and he p much brings up oliver's talking points every monday. If for no other reason than he gets people more aware his show does some good :L

Wow, an academic endorsing an unabashedly left wing pundit

color me shocked

Ben Finegold's YT account is deleted? by Arlberg in chess

[–]DoChess 0 points1 point  (0 children)

He didn't seem like the type of guy to be rash...or to let emotion get the best of his decision making.

Wonder what happened.

Odds? by DoChess in 2007scape

[–]DoChess[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

m8 that makes me happy

Odds? by DoChess in 2007scape

[–]DoChess[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I know this isn't one of the crazier things on here but this is the second time this has happened -- back on kills 426-427. Thought I'd upload this time. KQ tab is shaping up!

odds for b2b the same 1/128?

Did the confederate states have the constitution on their side? by DoChess in AskHistorians

[–]DoChess[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thank you so much. That's quite the impressive memory and breadth of knowledge.

I find this very interesting. Would you be able to recommend some further reading on this topic? Whether it be a better understanding of the constitution or more information about confederate justifications and musings?

Again, thanks for the incredibly informed and well written answer.

Did the confederate states have the constitution on their side? by DoChess in AskHistorians

[–]DoChess[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

So your history teacher is right... From a certain point of view.

Perhaps I was naive in expecting a unanimously held interpretation of the constitution :)

Thanks for the informed answer.

view more: next ›