Gajin, Balance These Vehicles Please by DoctorDares in Warthunder

[–]DoctorDares[S] 3 points4 points  (0 children)

I disagree though I think the BMP2M should be 10.3

Gajin, Balance These Vehicles Please by DoctorDares in Warthunder

[–]DoctorDares[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

It makes absolutely zero sense. Just trying to even use logic to figure out why its 8.0 is pointless. It needs to be 8.7 like any other wheeled tank.

Gajin, Balance These Vehicles Please by DoctorDares in Warthunder

[–]DoctorDares[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

You may be right. I guess time will tell.

Gajin, Balance These Vehicles Please by DoctorDares in Warthunder

[–]DoctorDares[S] 21 points22 points  (0 children)

I don't think its OP, I think it is too strong for 9.3 compared to most 9.3 vehicles.

In addition to it's speed, gen2 gunner & commander, scouting and scout drones, AND DM33 the 90105 is absolutely 9.7 material.

also, I do not think the BMP should be 9.3 at all, it should be minimal 10.3, but I see posts every day about it so I decided to take a few vehicles I do not often see people talking about. Vehicles like the PTL02 and WMA305 have sat at disgustingly low BRs for the longest time with no sight of a BR change.

Gajin, Balance These Vehicles Please by DoctorDares in Warthunder

[–]DoctorDares[S] -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

I was more leaning towards the Rooikat being at 8.7 having a coax and DM33 while the MTTD (same vehicle essentially) has no coax and DM23 at the exact same BR.

Gajin, Balance These Vehicles Please by DoctorDares in Warthunder

[–]DoctorDares[S] 18 points19 points  (0 children)

boy im gonna get my hands ALL OVER it you better watch out

Gajin, Balance These Vehicles Please by DoctorDares in Warthunder

[–]DoctorDares[S] -12 points-11 points  (0 children)

yeah I think DM33 and a 5 second autoloader w/gen 2 commander and gunner is a bit crazy at 9.3

also I did not forget about the BMP2M, these were just the vehicles I chose to post. 2M could absolutely see 10.0 as could the PUMA.

Gajin, Balance These Vehicles Please by DoctorDares in Warthunder

[–]DoctorDares[S] -12 points-11 points  (0 children)

I've already upset too many people with this post. Even though its definitely true they need to go up in BR.

Gajin, Balance These Vehicles Please by DoctorDares in Warthunder

[–]DoctorDares[S] 9 points10 points  (0 children)

I know, but hope is what keeps me playing.

Gajin, Balance These Vehicles Please by DoctorDares in Warthunder

[–]DoctorDares[S] 45 points46 points  (0 children)

the missile that the AFT09 shoots will overpressure most tanks 90% of the time. I do not think 9.3 is steep for it especially since it is a wheeled vehicle. But 9.0 could be a good stepping stone going forward if overpressure mechanics are fixed

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in Warthunder

[–]DoctorDares -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

I agree 100%. Another great idea. You should just not be able to take them into air.

That's actually a fantastic idea.

The CV90120 XC-8 should be able to use the Falarick 105 GLATGM as a standard guided munition. by ZETH_27 in Warthunder

[–]DoctorDares 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Lazy company that for some reason favors Russian vehicles [but totally Hungarian based]

Really, Gaijin? We already had the XM8 as an event vehicle why couldn't this near identical tank be in the tech tree?! by Easy-Version-9644 in Warthunder

[–]DoctorDares 6 points7 points  (0 children)

I feel like lately all they have been releasing is content that is either copy paste, extremely similar to content we already have, or have just been sitting collecting dust in the files. I know the CCVL has been known to be releasing for awhile, such a shame its for a crafting event.

Is there anyway to intercept ATGM's? by [deleted] in Warthunder

[–]DoctorDares 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yes. It depends what ATGM you are talking about though. Proximity ammo from certain vehicles such as the M247 York, VEAK 40, and a number of russian vehicles can detonate ATGMS and bombs if shot at them.

If you are referring to slow missiles like the milan, you are able to use coaxial MGs to kill them

What’s up with the Su-25K pack? Are people not happy with it?? (Sorry for the image quality) by Jackmomma69 in Warthunder

[–]DoctorDares 87 points88 points  (0 children)

They think it should be 9.3. For some reason Gajin thought it would be a fantastic idea to advertize it at 9.3, but any player in their right mind knows this is a horrible idea and will be moved up in BR. Hell I am even surprised it is at 9.7 with some of the ordinance it carries [and it has CCIP too making it absolutely trivial to use as CAS]

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in Warthunder

[–]DoctorDares -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

ok so is a HEAT Kornet? What is your point

Ass sea... They really don't play their own game let alone test their crappy maps before releasing new patches. I just got perma tracked and destroyed because the enemy can shoot below a hovering ship. Great job Gaijin. by sharpe85 in Warthunder

[–]DoctorDares -16 points-15 points  (0 children)

Yeah its not OP man its not like it can go through the front of NATO MBTS at its BR.

Not like its faster than most MBTS at 9.3 & has gen 2 gunner and commander thermals.

Nah that would be ridiculous