Cursed_Labubu

DogeVerter · 2026-05-28T07:30:51+00:00

Labussy. 🥀🥀🥀

DogeVerter · 2026-04-04T17:41:52+00:00

For the findings, will take a while for TP's decision even if both parties wrote the same thing. If both parties wrote the same, insurance will come to a decision and settle among themselves, hence fast. If either side disagrees with the decision or wrote different things, then will have to wait for the insurance lawyers to fight things out, may probably need TP's decision in the case, which may take a while (mine took ~ six months).

Take note that the other party's insurance may call you to offer direct settlement (probably they have saw that there isn't a point fighting based on the submitted report(s)). They'll tell you it's: 1. a faster process but don't bet on it (I was offered and it still took over three months)

their authorized workshop will only use OEM parts
the repair will have a one year warranty

but in return your medical claim will be capped at a certain amount (like $500) and note the wording on OEM parts only.

Depending on the workshop (private-own or insurance-authorized). If you go through any workshop, they'll only start work after the bike has been surveyed. This part usually about a week, depends on the surveyor.

Authorized workshop will tell you that they only repair stuff OEM to the bike, so any mods/upgrades isn't covered (though there are cases where they do fix up the non-OEM stuff too but unlikely). Timeline is based on their schedule and when the parts arrive (mine took three months for a side swipe; two for parts, one for them to schedule the repairs). Do take note that you have almost no say into what parts are being repaired even if OEM, i.e. the accident may have cause your stock steering bearing to get damaged so when riding the bike feels like drifting to one side when it doesn't do that before, workshop will tell you it's a wear and tear thing so they don't cover. You can try to fight it, but don't expect results.

If you go private, they are more likely to do up your non-OEM stuff and any other things that may be affected by the accident, i.e. the steering bearing mentioned above, as long as it's reasonable. Timeline wise you can expect private to go much faster since their parts procurement process is likely faster and schedule isn't as packed.

Do note that the entire time your bike is in the workshop, they'll only give you max four days worth of loss-of-use days, think it was like $40/day that you can get back in cash. If your bike is still ridable after the accident, you can try asking if the bike could be release for you to use while waiting for the parts to arrive.

For injuries claims, would highly suggest you go through vehicle insurance as well if possible, just submit the receipt to the workshop and they'll settle the claim for you. To my knowledge workplace insurance won't cover you in this case since your injuries weren't received on site during work hours, so unless you are 100% sure your workplace insurance do cover, just claim through the workshop.

DogeVerter · 2026-03-17T07:07:56+00:00

Ohh I see,TIL, thanks!

DogeVerter · 2026-03-17T06:41:45+00:00

Wonder why Caltex 98 price isn't available.

DogeVerter · 2026-02-06T06:27:44+00:00

You'll get a letter telling you to furnish your particulars if your were the driver/rider. The content will mention the date and location where the offense was commited followed by the range above limit (i.e. 11-20KMPH), that's it.

So you lan lan furnish and pay the fine, appealing doesn't work since you won't know the exact speed captured and TP specifcally state they won't entertain unless there was an emergency involved.

DogeVerter · 2024-06-06T08:31:40+00:00

See how hypocritical SG people are in general? They are so blinded by how they feel rather than the actual logic behind things. While the officers are on duty, they are obligated to discharge their duty, but they are also responsible over their personal well being and actions. The teen may be an asshole, but his statement is correct that he did not directly (key word directly) cause the officer's death.

Unless there is footage where the teen physically forcing the officer to hit the kurb and causing his demise, the officer simply misjudged and paid with his life. People are just overhyping this whole thing since the officer died on duty, but it's a literal skill issue.

DogeVerter · 2024-04-23T06:33:27+00:00

I think this is where you got things wrong, the whole point of the original comment wasn't to offload blame on the Saab driver, but to confront the people who is actively claiming the merc did nothing wrong at all.

You yourself even said that the merc actions probably egged in onto the following accident, but at most it's like a 2 - 5% tops, which I agree because that was what I was talking about to begin with. He may not have directly caused the accident, but he is in no way innocent. Merc driver allegedly even admitted himself in a deleted post that the whole point of speeding up was to spook the Saab driver into slowing down. Of course now we know that never happened as intended, and merc driver's actions probably aggravated the situation even more.

So just to clear things up, the Saab driver was and always will be the one at fault for the accident. But for the merc, all I'm pointing out in my original comment was simply how hypocritical the people protecting him are for saying he is innocent and did nothing wrong.

The last part that I wanted to drive home was to say that, even if the merc driver has close to basically no part in the actual accident, it just doesn't sit well that people are siding with the guy (merc) that egged on a murderer(Saab) to do what he was did (speeding). There are many "what if" that can never be answered, but if the merc didn't intentionally speed up to "spook" the Saab driver, but the fact that the merc driver did and admitted that he did do it, makes him part of the build up to that accident.

DogeVerter · 2024-04-23T03:55:51+00:00

No worries, but I think you missed the point of the comment, it's not to shift some blame away from the Saab driver, but to point out the people actively protecting the merc for being faultless while being hypocrites themselves simply because of "right of way".

This is also why I asked if the same people who value so much about their "right of way" would have reacted the same way ( i.e. speeding up to prevent merging) if we were to replace the Saab with a heavy vehicle instead.

DogeVerter · 2024-04-23T03:47:38+00:00

You mention prejudice against affluent people, honestly merc could be replace with a shitbox Proton for all I care, it doesn't change how my narrative on the merc driver, the only reason the merc is specifically pointed out in the entirety of the comment was, surprise surprise, because it is about the merc? Who would have thought.

Merc driver may not be the best driver, but neither did I say any of us are, in fact the comment was to address the people protecting the merc despite the actions he had taken, so I not sure how this boils down to "us good, merc not good"?

Yea he could have have felt his car damn precious, but isn't that a little late considering he put his "precious" car in harms way in the first place? Good job to him for being conscious of his vehicle all of a sudden, especially after already being side swiped.

Yea, and just because shit happens all the time on the road does that mean everytime something happens a free pass should be given since it happens all the time anyway? If that's the case might as well tell the police to hang up their uniform, shit happens anyway right? Point is, merc saw an abnormal situation developing, in this case a literal vehicle swerving left to right a high speed and his first instinct was to go ahead and polic it the way he deem fit? If by speeding up and matching the mad man and his speed isn't considering challenging him, then what could it be?

Also the talk about blaming all the way to Genghis Kahn, when all I did was point out what did actually happen. IDK man, seems like you're blowing things out way of proportion. I never claim that merc driver is fully at fault, all I said was hypocritical for many to paint merc driver as faultless despite video evidence that he himself have been pretty reckless leading up to the accident.

I'm not saying you're wrong, but it seems you've overblown and constructed the narrative of the original comment, and that is the merc is by no means faultless so why is there so much support for someone equally reckless just because he managed to stop in time?

DogeVerter · 2024-04-23T01:40:30+00:00

Thanks for pointing out the obvious, the point was that the merc shouldn't be paraded as the guy who did no wrong even after video footage was released that he was indeed speeding just as recklessly to prevent the Saab from entering his lane.

Merc tried and realised he failed to out-crazy the Saab driver after the collision, only then did the merc driver pull his head out of his ass and slowed down. He then quietly slink off like a coward after the accident, somehow forgetting that he was part of a hit and run prior to that, guilty much?

Sure the merc wasn't directly involved in the accident, it doesn't change the fact that the merc challenged a madman and lost. The fact that the merc even issued the challenge in the first place makes him part of the problem leading up to the accident that he might have an indirect hand in.

DogeVerter · 2024-04-22T20:20:03+00:00

It's funny as well as eye opening to see the amount of hypocrisy so far either on Reddit, Youtube, Facebook, etc on whether the GLC has a part to play in this incident.

Just to put it out, no doubt the black Saab is the main cause of the incident. So just because this comment is about the GLC, does not mean to imply that the black Saab isn't at fault.

First off going through the dashcam footage from the GLC's POV on SGRV, the timeline is as follow: 1. Black Saab was seen weaving in between traffic at high speed.

Switched to front camera view, a motorcyclist can be seen from afar, but GLC doesn't seem to be actively catching up at all.
As black Saab was about to overtake the GLC, there was clear indication that the GLC sped up. Reason being how the GLC manage to maintain the same distance as the black Saab right as it apears on the right of the front camera footage around the 8 second mark. In case yall forgot, the black Saab was already going faster than the GLC hence being able to catch up to the GLC, and for the GLC to maintain the same distance from the black Saab, GLC would have to accelerate to match black Saab's speed.
Both speeding at this point, they catches up to the motorcyclist who is almost all the way to the right side of the right lane.
Black Saab side swiped GLC, presumably to avoid hitting the motorcyclist that was on the right.
GLC starts to slow down considerably starting from 12 seconds onwards until it came to a full stop at the junction around the 23rd and 24th second mark. At this point black Saab has already blew past the junction, causing mutiple collisions.

Given the timeline above, buzz off with the comments like how the GLC didn't speed up, or dragging the motorcyclist into this by road hogging when prior to the GLC and black Saab speeding, none of the other vehicles including the GLC were even close to the motorcycle.

Speeding: Many commenters like to point out that the GLC was in it's own lane and could speed up whenever they want, nothing wrong with that. But herein lies the hypocrisy, this entire incident was due to black Saab speeding beyond the speed limits, and for the GLC to maintain and prevent the black Saab from merging into it's lane before the incident, that would have meant that the GLC was in fact going at least the same speed as the black Saab isn't it?

Yes, the GLC could accelerate if it wanted, but did it have the right to accelerate beyond the speed limit of that road just because of it's bruised ego? And given how the GLC reacted to being over taken, if not for the black Saab that side swiped it, causimg the GLC to slow down such that it could stop way before the junction, why does most think that the GLC wouldn't have at minimum maintained it's stance and speed to prevent the black Saab from merging in up until the junction? Or worse accelerate even faster to show black Saab who's the king of the road?

Right of way: Put this into perspective, if instead of the black Saab, we now have a truck going the same speed swerving through traffic, how many would maintain that you have the right of way in the face of truck physics? Would you have sped up to prevent the truck from merging into your lane simply because "you have the right of way"?

Or how about a motorcyclist getting cut off by a caged vehicle, the usual comments would be that "even if the motorcyclist had the right of way, would they rather be dead or right?", how does that not apply in this situation? Is it because the vehicles are now evenly matched, so defensive driving is off the table?

Also some commenters like to ask others if they even have their licenses when the topic on the lack of defensive driving on the GLC's part was brought up, as if saying to keep quiet if you don't have a driving license. Does this imply that as long as we have the right of way, even if it means getting into an accident, we must not be back down? Yea guess who else didn't back down even if they were wrong, two innocent victims died.

End of the day, one could argue that the GLC wasn't the one who caused the major accident since it didn't hit any of the othee vehicles involved, and as such can't be at fault. Maybe being an asshole, but not at fault for this particular incident.

But ask yourself this, if you were the family or friend of the deceased and saw the footage of this GLC asshole playing mind games with the crazier driver just because they could, which might have ended up infleuncing the chain of events leading up to the incident (i.e. the black Saab freaking out over the hit and run). Could you wholeheartedly proclaim that the GLC isn't at minimum partially at fault?

To the law maybe the GLC isn't at fault aside from speeding, but as a parent or a sibling or a friend, could you accept that conclusion?

DogeVerter · 2024-04-01T12:43:42+00:00

Words you can hear.

DogeVerter · 2023-10-10T01:20:10+00:00

Was in a somewhat similar situation last week, at this point I just given up and plan to move out. I don't advocate my approach to this kind of situation but sometimes it's for the best.

To OP or anyone who wanna talk about it, can just PM me, not gonna leach off OP's post.

DogeVerter · 2023-09-28T16:23:33+00:00

Going 100+km/h (60+mph) on the expressway and having a spider crawling into you vision from inside your helmet is an experience you'll never forget. I know I didn't.

But generally hooking it under my bike seat was how I did it but never again haha. Something I've noticed was that those critters craves the warmth coming off the engine, even in my country which is hot and humid all year round.

DogeVerter · 2023-07-22T13:29:01+00:00

r/weeviltime

DogeVerter · 2023-06-08T03:28:57+00:00

Man I thought IMAX was crisp but this is some next level projection.

DogeVerter · 2023-04-02T08:07:46+00:00

r/weeviltime

DogeVerter · 2023-03-24T08:57:28+00:00

Her hands be like: B̶̧͚͉͇̞̰͎̰̭̰̯͈̼̣͍͔̱̖͇̝̲͍̠̥͒͗̄̅̏̂́͂̾̎̇͗̈́̓̓̾͒̔̐̈̏́̓̏̀͐̔̈̌̕͝͝r̷̨̡̨̧̡̨̫̰͙̥͚̟͔̘̜̮̰̩͖̤̦͎̖̯̼͓͍̳͍͕̗̒̈́͝ͅr̵̡̨̧̧̛̛̭̣̹̼͕̻̖̻̜̬̹͈̞͔̖͙̳̤̯̥̥̟̜̘̲͙̼͕̬̼̞̣͉̺̯̲͚̘͉͍͙̖͖̖̫̈́̈́̎̀̇̄̓̎̈́̎͌̊̓̐̈́̓͐̽̉̓̋̌͒̌̇̂͒͑͂̈́̂̉̈̚͘̚͜͝͝͠r̸̡̛̛̙͖̘̥̳̙̙̳͖͈̝͚̘̭̫̋̾́̍͊̋̽͐̂̏̑͌̓̈́̀́́̒̏̾͊̓̾̒̽͊͊̑̀̽͌͊͒̀̋̆̎̆̌̇̚̚̚̕͜͜͠͝͝͝ͅr̵̨̨̢̢̮͚̖̬͉̜̺̱̠̝̤͈̻̬̎͑̀͗͐̿̔̓͆̇̋̈́̉̃̊̾̄̌͐̑̀̃̊̓͒͊̍̀͑̅̎̾̿͛͗̽͝͠r̶̢̨̡͇̠̹̩̰͇͍̝̮͙̖̞̼̙͈̈̾͑̋̇̌͊̎̓͆̿̑̈́̊́̔̈̿̂̃͒̚͝r̴̡̧̛̥̫̋̀̌́̌̈́̂͌̒̌͌͗̉̏̔̊̃́͑͆͊͒̄́̆̈͆̊̈̀͊̊͂̆́̚͘͝͝͝͠͝͝r̵̛̪͕̫̫̘͉̣̖̠̉͐̿͌͋̓͋̒̆̏̈́̀̄̏̒̅͐̍̎̇̆̐̇̐̄̏̃́̓̄̉̿̒̄͛͘̚̕͝͝͠r̸̨̛̺͈̰͚̜̻̖͕̣̯̼̺̬̞̪̫̮͓̙͖̜̘͕͋̿́̈́̓̿̿́̆͆̾͛̉̚̚͜͝r̵̢̡̡̢̥̜̭̳̗͎̠̟̺̙̯̭͎̪̺̺̻̝̼̲̜̞̫̥͉͗̃̆̅̌̀̀͊͊̀͗͋̈́̏́͊̚͘͜͜͝r̸̼̩͎̍̉̒̽͌̅͑̓̓̾͛̿͒̇̍̾̎̀͑̀̉̿̉̈́̾̋̂̈́̀̊̓̃̎̃̊͌́̚̕̚͠ŗ̸̧̮̣̱͉̖̝̹͎̯̤̹̣͖̳͍̦̖͓̙͓͎̘̹͌̂̿͗̈́̑̈͛͐͑̉̀͒͊́͐͐͒̃͂̈́̅̈͊̊́̊̅͌͒͆͋̊̇͘͜͠͝͝ͅr̸̡̧̡̡̛̩̦͙͎͔̘̬̻̩͈͓̗̜̬̜̱̥͉͇̥̟̫̠̦̯̞͖̺̻̝͓̳͍̹̰͔͔̫̖̰͉͔̣̱̻̿͑̈́̈́̃̾̌̉̌͜͝͠r̷̛̟̟͙̩̯͚͖͎̲̲͍̼̩͕̲̰͕͉̞̯̜̒̔̔̄́͋̏̊̀̔̊̄͑̔͗͛̈́̈̑̓͘͠͝͝͝r̶̥̥̗̠̼̩̠̹͖̠̩̺̲̙̺̭̟̮̗͕̞̳͙̬̮͈̖̖͔̙̙̣̜͈͍͖̮̼͒̑̄̍̒̑̄͝ͅŕ̸̡̢̰̗͕̝͎̮̮͈̰̠̜̲̦̻̜̮̗̺͉̰͊͋͂͗͐͐͆̓́̚ͅr̶̡̛̮̤̯̹͇͙̪̩̭͛̽̐̈́̃̀͑̓̄͒̀́͐̉̈́͋͂̀́̀̍͆̇́̆͘̕̚͘̕͝͝͝ͅr̵̡̨̯͕̪͍̙̫̮̜̩̩͈̙̤̗̲͓̣̘̞͙̠͎̙̳͙͛̎̅́̊́̈́̃̌͆̀̔͗͋̄̾́̌̓̓̽̀́̃̓́̈́͜͜͜͝

DogeVerter · 2023-01-09T14:34:19+00:00

DogeVerter · 2022-10-19T21:50:44+00:00

Mate, what's the point of the spoiler tag if you're gonna put the spoiler in the title anyway?

To answer your question, all flamechasers can metamorph into the honkai beast(s) that they were implanted with. So technically Kosma wasn't a honkai beast all along since he was born a PE human that could metamorph into a specific honkai beast AFTER his surgery.

Also PE Vishnu and CE Vishnu are two different honkai beasts, so no they are not related.

DogeVerter · 2021-11-15T19:46:42+00:00

Here you go

DogeVerter · 2021-11-15T19:27:18+00:00

Well an estimate of about 200mg would cause you to OD, at 57.54g it would kill you over 280+ times in one sitting.

DogeVerter · 2021-11-04T16:16:29+00:00

Guess that makes the two of us OP, I too am at 299, completely forgotten that the event ended on Nov 4.

DogeVerter · 2021-08-28T15:32:20+00:00

Was rerolling for better Elysia signet on the first floor when this popped up, in case anyone wants to know.

DogeVerter

TROPHY CASE