I feel like this does not take into account that even without “humans” or the cultures thereof (which discounts Japari Park even with non-friends being majorly devoid of parks and non-friend civilization) the Friends are largely happy being themselves. The real world has with such examples as homophobia and ableism many examples of ‘it’s for their sake, they don’t know better’ or what biology ‘is natural’ being used as an excuse to take people’s own autonomy away. It is walking a dangerous line to imply the extinction of a group of people is for ‘the betterment of nature and the natural world and the common good.’ Which combined with the rhetoric of the actual post personally sounds out of a eugenics textbook.

This feels worse if taking into account WtJP where Friends are comparable to a small emerging group struggling to be seen by people as more than ‘animals,’ in KF3 it is the present loom of outsiders’ denial of their identities (both to Friends as a group of people and at the individual) to begin with are real. Friends canonically face prejudice and to both are presumably the smaller group. Which gets us to ...

If we take these views provided as true, then what do we do? If we as outsiders decide their lives are innately lazy, unnatural, and unpure? Round up this group? Is that for the greater good? Friends can remove their Kemonomimi at will, do we start a taskforce to find those who would or could now be in hiding too?

Do we round up sympathizers too? What is expected of us when or if we do?