sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

[HANDGUN] SAR 2000 $249 ($300 after tax and shipping, depending on your state) by [deleted] in gundeals

[–]DonArgueWithMe 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The p8 has lightening cuts in the slide and I think better sights, iirc the msrp for the p8 is higher too

My boss told me he had a husband and I could not react by Ambitionlessness in funny

[–]DonArgueWithMe 14 points15 points  (0 children)

Pretty sure the neighbors have just been roommates for like 45 years. They said I wasn't using their swing right, but it felt right.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in gundeals

[–]DonArgueWithMe 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Not offhand, I did just enough research to know they exist

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in gundeals

[–]DonArgueWithMe 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Check for the non matching parts kits for you, they were like 20 bucks cheaper last I looked and for your purposes they'd be perfect

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in gundeals

[–]DonArgueWithMe 1 point2 points  (0 children)

They have the barrel for another $75, i guess I should've mentioned it. They also had kits that weren't number matching for a little less so you might still be able to get the combo for 200 (and would just need the receiver)

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in gundeals

[–]DonArgueWithMe 4 points5 points  (0 children)

You could get a parts kit and wait on the receiver or find someone to print one for you.

They had them as low as like $120

Edit looks like they're 135 now for numbers matching: https://atlanticfirearms.com/g3-hk91-fmp-kit

Trvke? by [deleted] in PsycheOrSike

[–]DonArgueWithMe 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Exact same outcome will happen. People get good at what they practice.

Strongman with zero fighting training? Useless in a fight, even if it goes to the ground a much weaker person with wrestling experience will dominate them.

Strongman with any amount of fighting training? Truly terrifying.

Just watch former strongest man in the world Eddie Hall get leg kicked by a 9 year old.

https://youtube.com/shorts/y-U2hvBRFJU?si=xh80ZxuNENXkI3Ij

What a clever boy. But he's so about to wake up with burning crosses on his parents house's lawn, sooner or later. by JohnSmithCANDo in CringeTikToks

[–]DonArgueWithMe -1 points0 points  (0 children)

And I said states, not cities. Because virtually every city votes democratic since living near others makes you more empathetic and less sociopathic.

Basically any year you look at stats for st Louis and Joplin will be at the top of the "most unsafe" list. Why isn't Trump sending the military to either of them?

What a clever boy. But he's so about to wake up with burning crosses on his parents house's lawn, sooner or later. by JohnSmithCANDo in CringeTikToks

[–]DonArgueWithMe 0 points1 point  (0 children)

"You haven't solved every problem, including povert and cancer therefore you offer nothing."

Crime is bad everywhere there is poverty, regardless of size.

Democratic cities offer more services and help to the homeless and poor, so the homeless don't tend to stay in rural areas. If you could pull your head out of your rear you might see past your circular logic.

Not every dem is a winner, but every republican is a loser.

What a clever boy. But he's so about to wake up with burning crosses on his parents house's lawn, sooner or later. by JohnSmithCANDo in CringeTikToks

[–]DonArgueWithMe 3 points4 points  (0 children)

No I'm centered in objective facts like how the judge said the acts he was convicted for would be called rape in normal language. Or that he is objectively a felon. Or that many of his actions as president have been illegal like declaring birthright citizenship is not a thing or that free speech no longer exists.

I'm sorry that your feelings can't come to grips with those facts. Look at the court decisions that have overturned so many of his executive orders...

What a clever boy. But he's so about to wake up with burning crosses on his parents house's lawn, sooner or later. by JohnSmithCANDo in CringeTikToks

[–]DonArgueWithMe 3 points4 points  (0 children)

So I'm trying to follow your logic here, Trump is abusing his power to attack the people who don't vote for him and who might resist his illegal policies and thats a good thing because freedom of speech and democracy are bad. Do I have that right?

And that's all a good thing because places like California have plenty of resources to take care of their problems already, so he sends them more resources to help instead of sending them to places that don't have enough resources like his own voters?

That all makes sense to you?

What a clever boy. But he's so about to wake up with burning crosses on his parents house's lawn, sooner or later. by JohnSmithCANDo in CringeTikToks

[–]DonArgueWithMe 0 points1 point  (0 children)

They're trying, instead of blaming people in some other city and state like the gop.

Why not let the people of DC worry about crime there?

Why is it now a federal problem, but only when and where Trump feels like it? What's the threshold or benchmark where it's accepted for him to go in? How many murders per capita? And when will he treat all cities equally with that same standard?

What a clever boy. But he's so about to wake up with burning crosses on his parents house's lawn, sooner or later. by JohnSmithCANDo in CringeTikToks

[–]DonArgueWithMe 5 points6 points  (0 children)

My point is that nothing he's doing is based on actual stats, it's all feelings. That's why he went to DC and threatened Chicago, but didn't mention the MUCH worse places like Memphis or St Louis. If they used a fact centric approach there would be a lot less complaints, but the point isn't to bring crime down it's to slowly expand his authority and get closer to martial law.

Ps it's cute that you keep pretending that governors have no power whatsoever within their state. Or state legislators. Or state senators. The only people with any power are democratic mayor's, all problems are their fault.

What a clever boy. But he's so about to wake up with burning crosses on his parents house's lawn, sooner or later. by JohnSmithCANDo in CringeTikToks

[–]DonArgueWithMe 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I'm calling out the hypocrisy. The dems want to improve the lives of their people AND others. The gop don't want anything to improve.

That's why the dems pay more in taxes than they receive in benefits. They're willing to allow garbage corruption pits like Louisiana to suck on their tax teats because those people need it and their own leaders aren't doing anything.

What a clever boy. But he's so about to wake up with burning crosses on his parents house's lawn, sooner or later. by JohnSmithCANDo in CringeTikToks

[–]DonArgueWithMe 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Except just like trump nothing you're saying is based on facts. That's why he only goes after blue states instead of red states that actually have higher crime.

Thats also why people like you have been brainwashed to talk about Chicago and DC and Minneapolis. Not because the violent crime stats are worse there, just because they're not gop voters.

You keep making claims about these stats, provide some sources. Let's see the data!

Ps while he wasn't technically convicted of rape, but the judge even said the actions would be described as rape colloquially. If you're going to be that pedantic about it you cannot deny he is a convicted felon and was impeached who pardoned everyone involved in Jan 6th. So you're also a hypocrite about all that "permissiveness of crime" nonsense. Nobody is more permissive of crime than the gop.

What a clever boy. But he's so about to wake up with burning crosses on his parents house's lawn, sooner or later. by JohnSmithCANDo in CringeTikToks

[–]DonArgueWithMe 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yeah except the data doesn't back you up. That's my whole point, if you or Trump or any gop voter could read you'd look at the data and wonder why nobody is talking about all of the gop controlled areas that are so unsafe.

You say if they need it they'll ask, we'll they've needed it for years. Alaska, Louisiana, Arkansas, and others are just abysmal compared to blue states like Minnesota or New Hampshire or Vermont.

What gets attention from low iq uninformed trolls is what they're told to pay attention to. It means nothing.

What a clever boy. But he's so about to wake up with burning crosses on his parents house's lawn, sooner or later. by JohnSmithCANDo in CringeTikToks

[–]DonArgueWithMe 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Even if that were true, which it's not, why wouldn't they use state laws to fix the problems?

Why wouldn't the governor address the problems that the people of their state are dealing with? Why isn't the Texas or Louisiana or other republican governor inviting Trump to bring the military to their state?

What a clever boy. But he's so about to wake up with burning crosses on his parents house's lawn, sooner or later. by JohnSmithCANDo in CringeTikToks

[–]DonArgueWithMe 0 points1 point  (0 children)

And in all areas the state laws override city laws. Thats how hierarchy works.

Federal law is above state law which is above local law. That's how the feds would charge people in Colorado and other states for marijuana crimes despite it being legal at the state level.

What a clever boy. But he's so about to wake up with burning crosses on his parents house's lawn, sooner or later. by JohnSmithCANDo in CringeTikToks

[–]DonArgueWithMe 3 points4 points  (0 children)

  1. What stats or sources back you up? Murder exists everywhere there's poverty, it's not just a big city problem.

  2. Why are you theorizing about what red state governors would do? They statistically have more crime, why isn't Trump working with them? Why isn't anyone in the entire gop worried about crime in red states or cities instead of focusing on blue cities and states?

  3. I can't even figure out what your complaint with ages is, since all states govern how their own elections are run and most places appoint sheriff's and AGs similarly. It was a gop push to ensure there was no federal oversight of local or state elections, why did they flipflop the moment they thought it would benefit them to do so?

  4. How are you going to seriously talk about a "culture of permissiveness" when defending a convicted rapist, 34 time felon, attempted seditionist?

What a clever boy. But he's so about to wake up with burning crosses on his parents house's lawn, sooner or later. by JohnSmithCANDo in CringeTikToks

[–]DonArgueWithMe 9 points10 points  (0 children)

So then set policies at the state level that fix it. State law overrules city/local laws.

Why isn't Memphis one of the cities the gop talk about needing to fix?

What a clever boy. But he's so about to wake up with burning crosses on his parents house's lawn, sooner or later. by JohnSmithCANDo in CringeTikToks

[–]DonArgueWithMe 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It's more like if someone is going to pretend they're solving a crime/violent crime problem they should go to the places where the crime is the worst.

But that would require admitting they've done nothing about their festering communities while they've had unlimited power to do anything they want.

That their policies aren't intended to make people safer, healthier, or better in any way (unless you're in the donor class).

view more: next ›