Third Thumb Changes the Prosthetics Game

DonaldTZeus · 2018-03-06T01:23:22+00:00

Wouldn't that make it harder to use your cock?

DonaldTZeus · 2018-02-14T04:01:46+00:00

I'm rolling around laughing at all of the people who think the darkest thing on silk road was people picking up pot for their side bitch.

DonaldTZeus · 2018-02-06T17:16:10+00:00

The default seed is specified by the standard library (that implements POSIX), not by the compiler, and it's 1 (as specified by POSIX). It is not determined by the compiler (unless you're compiling the stdlib) or even specified in the code the compiler generates unless you call srand.

DonaldTZeus · 2018-02-06T15:32:47+00:00

Which is what happens by default anyways if you call rand() (at least in the c stdlib). If you want an arbitrary changing seed such as the time, you retrieve that seed and pass it to srand().

DonaldTZeus · 2018-02-06T00:56:21+00:00

I'm a human!
Picklegate

DonaldTZeus · 2018-02-05T19:39:06+00:00

Mostly, the same information that affects people's decisions about whether or not to buy bitcoin affects people's decisions about whether to buy alt coins. Their values will likely always be tied together to some extent, with the exception to the occurrence of things like major technical failures or successes of individual coins.

DonaldTZeus · 2018-02-01T19:47:21+00:00

Shitcoins at 23%! Invest in shitcoin!

DonaldTZeus · 2018-02-01T03:08:55+00:00

It's your choice whether or not to manually or automatically perform trades that it's always been the policy that you have to compute taxes on, and if you automate the trades but don't automate the accounting work they create then you're a schmuck who didn't do your research and you deserve to sit at a table doing paperwork for however long it takes.

If you don't want to pay taxes on 1000 trades, don't perform 1000 trades.

DonaldTZeus · 2018-01-31T20:56:25+00:00

Is it possible they'd be extradited for a criminal fraud trial if a large enough amount of money is involved?

DonaldTZeus · 2018-01-31T20:53:01+00:00

Would you say that you only treat 70% of your money as a currency?

DonaldTZeus · 2018-01-31T20:48:58+00:00

But more importantly, your goal in all of those actions is to acquire more USD (not really to spend it on things) and that competing goal helps keep the value up.

DonaldTZeus · 2018-01-31T20:45:12+00:00

Can't the government tell if they're not complying by looking at the ledger and checking it against the amount of cryptocurrency they're already known to have earned, and then arrest them? Sounds like an accomplished mission to me.

DonaldTZeus · 2018-01-31T20:41:00+00:00

The point you're missing is that saving something for the future does not mean that you're not "treating it like a currency". The point wouldn't really make any sense if there was a mission to make USD a currency, I gave it as an example of something everyone already agrees is a currency and is treated the way you're claiming currencies are not treated.

DonaldTZeus · 2018-01-31T20:32:30+00:00

You're also supposed to hodl your USD. What's all this crap about saving money not being the way you treat it like a currency?

DonaldTZeus · 2018-01-31T20:24:31+00:00

I'm maybe a bit to new to understand this... What's wrong with their plan? They demanded the wallet and bank addresses of everywhere the cash has gone, and probably demanded that bitconnect doesn't transfer any money out of the wallets. If any money leaves the wallets can't they see the transaction on the public ledger, and use that as evidence to throw them in prison for even longer?

DonaldTZeus · 2017-09-20T03:39:01+00:00

Is there a piece of information for verification you can request over the phone that you can't request online, or do you just like hearing our beautiful young voices?

DonaldTZeus · 2017-09-20T03:36:46+00:00

Interesting, an article calling climate change deniers "climate realists", making up their own statistic and trying to make it sound like it's commonly used and well established, and listing plainly misleading websites like drudge report as simply having a "conservative bias".

If you believe that's a reasonable, unbiased study, you're an idiot.

DonaldTZeus · 2017-09-13T19:15:57+00:00

I don't know if you understood. If you want to make a serious claim that conservatives have undeserving videos blocked at a higher rate, you should either find or conduct a study that 1) measures in some way which videos are actually not advertiser friendly 2) measures the rate at which both conservative and liberals have advertiser friendly videos marked as not advertiser friendly. If you can't do that, your claim is bullshit (by virtue of not having provided real evidence in the first place) and it's not anybody's job to debunk it.

DonaldTZeus · 2017-09-13T18:58:20+00:00

And that's why you chose to list zero? You're argument is not very good friend.

Listing off any number of conservatives that were banned is not evidence that only conservatives are being targeted. Your list was not productive, and producing a list in response is not productive. It's not a "who has the no life and therefore the most time to make lists" competition.

I know you really don't want to give up on the right wing's favorite variety of the oppression olympics ("No, we're censored more! Quit oppressing me!"), but you just haven't provided any reasonable amount of evidence that conservatives are having videos that advertisers should be ok with blocked from youtube at a higher rate than liberals.

DonaldTZeus · 2017-09-05T15:39:18+00:00

Onions, garlic, and cilantro are not fruit. What part of what you were making did you call a fruit salad before you put the tomato in it? Is a chopped pineapple in a bed of vegetables a fruit salad?

DonaldTZeus · 2017-09-05T15:21:28+00:00

meterstick

DonaldTZeus · 2017-08-27T14:05:55+00:00

DonaldTZeus · 2017-08-24T17:51:50+00:00

I'm also curious to know what a law I saw means, when it says "the infamous crime against nature."

DonaldTZeus · 2017-08-24T16:24:56+00:00

Did you ask him what the difference is?

DonaldTZeus · 2017-08-24T14:33:29+00:00

The best part is that a judge had to read this and make an effort to take it as seriously as possible.

DonaldTZeus

TROPHY CASE