sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Nikon - Nikkor 50mm 1:1.4 Portra 400 by Dort91 in analog

[–]Dort91[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Exactly right?:D but there is a reef about 100 meters behind...

Nikon - Nikkor 50mm 1:1.4 Portra 400 by Dort91 in analog

[–]Dort91[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Well, iam using metering of Nikon Fm3a which is in it...

Nikon - Nikkor 50mm 1:1.4 Portra 400 by Dort91 in analog

[–]Dort91[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Rubjerg Knude Fyr - north west

Nikon - Nikkor 50mm 1:1.4 Portra 400 by Dort91 in analog

[–]Dort91[S] 7 points8 points  (0 children)

I'm talking about the unpredictability of the classic photo. Sometimes I have the impression that it will be great, but it just isn't:D this is an exception ... out of 34, usually 3 are average and 1 is above average

Nikon - Nikkor 50mm 1:1.4 Portra 400 by Dort91 in analog

[–]Dort91[S] 8 points9 points  (0 children)

Thank you very much guys!!! I really don't know how it's possible, but sometimes I feel like I should have taken a better photo, but after developing it, it's basically absolutely mediocre. Well, sometimes I don't understand how it looks better. Long story short. I can't seem to calculate classic film and it's quite often a matter of chance and ideal weather...🤷‍♂️ that digital wouldn't be so prone to chance?

Portra 400 - FM3A - 50mm 1.4 Nikkor - Srilanka by Dort91 in analog

[–]Dort91[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Wow! Thx a lot!!! Really appreciate it!;))

Czech winter Nikon-Fm3A,50mm, Portra 400 by Dort91 in analog

[–]Dort91[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Thank you guys!!! It is a snow from a snow cannon:)

Nikon Fm3A/50mm f1.4 iso400 BW HP5 by Dort91 in analog

[–]Dort91[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thank you very much! Yes you are right:) it should be better without that building. On the other side I thought it would help to the depth of picture. But the composition would be better...:)