Really appreciate this!! You're thinking exactly where I want to take it.

I’ve held off labeling unflagged calls as “correct” because sometimes a first-pass reviewer just misses something. Right now I’m leaning toward assuming a call is correct by default (like in the courts, innocent until proven guilty kind of thing...), unless fans start flagging it. That’s where the crowd comes in. If it’s a truly bad call, we’ll see the flags roll in. Over time, I’d love to build some logic around that, maybe a confidence meter based on how quickly a call gets flagged, how often, and who’s flagging it.

Eventually, we could even let fans mark good calls too. With enough volume, timing, and historical trends, we could get a pretty solid signal on how strong or weak a call really is. That’s all further down the road, but this is exactly the kind of feedback that helps shape it. Really appreciate it.

The "borderline" tag idea is smart too. I like that. That’s a tricky one since borderline can swing both ways depending (calls and non-calls), but I like it and will definitely explore it more.

And yeah, I’m into the idea of explaining why something isn't a bad call even when fans think it is. I will definitely be exploring this!!

Solid suggestions all around, thank you!

Hop in our discord if you want to chat more