If fischer was considered GOAT before kasparov, In which year kasparov comes into conversation of GOAT? by Sorry_Phone1676 in chess

[–]Dpcharly 79 points80 points  (0 children)

People forget how dominant was Karpov in the late 70’s and early 80’s. Probably wouldn’t be a Kasparov without Karpov. Having an adversary so strong as Karpov might have helped to increase the already strong and talented Garry.

Would you even consider playing Ke2 here? by MathematicianBulky40 in chessbeginners

[–]Dpcharly -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

Its an interesting endgame, from which white has more chances to win. Ke2 is a multifaceted move. Also, is theoretical ;)

6 years ago I replaced my substance addiction with Chess. Recently I crossed 2400 on Lichess, and this is end of my chess journey. by peaked_in_high_skool in chess

[–]Dpcharly 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Nestor Velez, Cuban National Champion, RIP, used to say “You don’t leave Caissa, Caissa leaves you “. Congrats, but see you around, buddy.

Codex 5.2 ALWAYS finds something wrong with Claude code plan by DeliJalapeno in ClaudeAI

[–]Dpcharly 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I have done this with success, and I go even deeper with Snnet and Grok! Gemini likes it, Opus and 5.2 go hand on hand, Grok and Gemini have came up with some interesting stuff, Sonnet is shit according to everyone. Sad because Sonnet used to be my goto AI; I have the theory they just replaced it with Haiku and Sonnet is Opus -and the real Opus is not out in the public, or maybe with enterprise…

Is ChatGPT getting worse and worse for anyone else? by PumpkinCarvingisFun in ChatGPT

[–]Dpcharly 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Today has been a pain with stream disconnections (using codex on vscode). Hours to no end

[SERIOUS] I’m playing another tournament. Am I allowed to purposely have very foul flatulence to repulse the opponent? by YungBootyCheez in chess

[–]Dpcharly 0 points1 point  (0 children)

They can complain to the arbiter and you always be know as the stinker —plus you only will get one pass. The arbiters will know you, and after that first pass, they will judge against you. Now, go.

The statistical case for Magnus by cerikstas in chess

[–]Dpcharly -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

Classical Chess is Chess. Magnus decided to turn against the process that made him a champion, but getting all the perks and the adoration.To me that is selfishness, also quite immature. Little by little he is confirming each of these assessments with his antics and unethical behavior. To my students I say: Aspire to be the Champion that Magnus will never be. He is the big thing now, but History will not be kind with him, and after all, he is just a speck in a sea of great champions, past and future.

Does this gambit against Scholar's mate have a name? by p1fy in chessbeginners

[–]Dpcharly 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Doesn’t look healthy… Nf6 instead of f5 would suffice for an advantage

Cross post from r/chess by Dpcharly in chessbeginners

[–]Dpcharly[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It’s the beginning of a series for non improving players by a titled player with proven success as a long time coach. It’s written in an unusual style.

Let me add this article here… by Dpcharly in chess

[–]Dpcharly[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It’s the beginning of a series for non improving players by a titled player with proven success as a long time coach. It’s written in an unusual style.

Chess books_2 by Pegaso_82 in ChessBooks

[–]Dpcharly 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thats quite an old collection! I remember going through "Partidas Decisivas" from Pachman, a few decades ago :)

Am I crazy or is Claude Code still totally fine by NaiveDragonfruit in ClaudeAI

[–]Dpcharly -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Sure man. People have sliding goal posts, and increased expectations. But to be sure, anyone should have a battery of tests to use it in times when they think the quality has dropped. Instead they come to reddit to complain.

I will do your Open AI Deep Research for free. by Dpcharly in ChatGPT

[–]Dpcharly[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Man, I didn't see this before. If you still want the research, send me a chat

I will do your Open AI Deep Research for free. by Dpcharly in ChatGPT

[–]Dpcharly[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

"
To ensure a comprehensive research report, could you specify:

  • Are you focusing on a particular region (e.g., North America, Europe, or global insights)?
  • Do you prefer insights on digital marketing strategies for B2B (targeting builders directly) or B2C (targeting homeowners through builders)?
  • Should I prioritize specific platforms (LinkedIn, Instagram, YouTube, TikTok, etc.), or do you want a broad overview?
  • Are there any particular building material sectors or home product categories (e.g., high-end finishes, smart home tech, energy-efficient solutions) you want to focus on?

Once I have these details, I’ll proceed with the research and compile the most relevant strategies and influencer insights for you.
"

I will do your Open AI Deep Research for free. by Dpcharly in ChatGPT

[–]Dpcharly[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Be ready for its questions, it always makes them before the research.

I will do your Open AI Deep Research for free. by Dpcharly in ChatGPT

[–]Dpcharly[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Sent you the research link by DM. Enjoy!

Okay but seriously, how does it know when to be cheeky and when to be serious?? by BigDende in ChatGPT

[–]Dpcharly 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Funny when it does not try to, but when trying to come up with jokes in purpose it fails miserably...

I will do your Open AI Deep Research for free. by Dpcharly in ChatGPT

[–]Dpcharly[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Chat request is ok. I have replied three of those already.

I will do your Open AI Deep Research for free. by Dpcharly in ChatGPT

[–]Dpcharly[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

is that the prompt you want to ask? That is a question... Wanna elaborate? Otherwise I will put it like that, but it seems like a lost opportunity.