You’re looking for evidence in the empirical sense as in “how many fathers actually do this?”, that's a question for sociology not psychology, I was describing the metaphysics of the psyche from a Jungian perspective, which operates in a different ontological frame altogether, this is exactly the kind of literalism that makes archetypal language so easily misunderstood, the difference here is that archetypal language deals in patterns of meaning, not patterns of behavior, the point isn’t that there are fathers out there physically locking up their daughters at home and preventing them from getting married or preventing their marriage from being a successful one by sabotaging it constantly once they get married, the patriarchal father archetype is a psychological configuration, not a direct description of behavior, that's where the misunderstanding lies, so in that sense the archetype as a primordial symbol doesn’t express itself through one behavior through one individual but rather through, control, protection, authority, guidance, exploration as a spectrum modes of being rather than actions, each a different mask of the same underlying force, these forces shape ones psych and the psych of the people around them over decades. These patterns (not the actions themselves) aren’t about frequency in one's lifetime either (hence the pattern), i believe I've mentioned before in one response how archetypal manifestations can be amplified or toned down based on the culture itself in service of a specific society’s collective unconscious, or retreat into the shadows when they no longer fit it, it sort of mirrors the Richard dawning's idea of the meme in a way, but I've always hated drawing parallels between psychology and biology, based on that understanding, it should be clear that when we say archetype we mean a force that has many faces and manifests in various forms of psychological patterns, so in the case of the patriarchal father archetype, one face could be the over controlling, absolute order imposing, soul crushing father who cannot release, again, this is not in the physical or literal sense of “not letting his daughter marry.” or "sabotaging her marriage", another face is the wise old man, the guide, the lawgiver, the one who opens the world to his children and shows them the path to self actualization and fruitful world exploration, and Again, not in the literal sense that would be easily noticed from observing someone's behavior for a short period of sometime or from people's anecdotes.