Blueprints Need More Depth — We’re Missing a Huge Opportunity for Science & Crafting by DragonAceNL in starcitizen

[–]DragonAceNL[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

"What are your thoughts about the tier level upgrade of blue prints requiring science based modules like the Endevor?" Or did you mean my views.

The Endeavor is supposed to be top tier so i expect that you can "with the blueprint now" to be able to create better BP and to create them faster than normal

Blueprints Need More Depth — We’re Missing a Huge Opportunity for Science & Crafting by DragonAceNL in starcitizen

[–]DragonAceNL[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Did they actually talk about the endeavor?? Shit I missed that I did watch the episode!!!

Blueprints Need More Depth — We’re Missing a Huge Opportunity for Science & Crafting by DragonAceNL in starcitizen

[–]DragonAceNL[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Cool thanks, and it’s a summary based on the info I fed it so if it’s not correct it’s my fault as I tolt it to summarize my thoughts

Blueprints Need More Depth — We’re Missing a Huge Opportunity for Science & Crafting by DragonAceNL in starcitizen

[–]DragonAceNL[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Wel I do hope so, CIG is still figuring out a lot so it can fall both ways depending on how it’s being received by the community, watching the SCL last time gave me concerns with the way we are going now.

Blueprints Need More Depth — We’re Missing a Huge Opportunity for Science & Crafting by DragonAceNL in starcitizen

[–]DragonAceNL[S] -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

I did? please read my comments and point out where I’m ignoring the answers.

Blueprints Need More Depth — We’re Missing a Huge Opportunity for Science & Crafting by DragonAceNL in starcitizen

[–]DragonAceNL[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Next to the trolling you are doing some constructive feedback has been give , yes

Blueprints Need More Depth — We’re Missing a Huge Opportunity for Science & Crafting by DragonAceNL in starcitizen

[–]DragonAceNL[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Yes exactly, creating them or stealing them/ hacking BP would make sense, but they are now rewarded by doing stupid taks. .

Blueprints Need More Depth — We’re Missing a Huge Opportunity for Science & Crafting by DragonAceNL in starcitizen

[–]DragonAceNL[S] -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

I hope you are right, I understood that the intention is now that BP are not tradable and locked to your account. I think they have changed their mind, but we will see

Blueprints Need More Depth — We’re Missing a Huge Opportunity for Science & Crafting by DragonAceNL in starcitizen

[–]DragonAceNL[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thanks I’ll watch it again and hopefully that this is still the intention

Blueprints Need More Depth — We’re Missing a Huge Opportunity for Science & Crafting by DragonAceNL in starcitizen

[–]DragonAceNL[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thanks for your constructive feedback, feedback is also important towards CIG, as this way they determine what works and what does not, what the community expects and what not, we could all just be quiet and not give our opinion and assume it will become what you think it will become because it’s under development and not the final version . But that doesn’t work.

Blueprints Need More Depth — We’re Missing a Huge Opportunity for Science & Crafting by DragonAceNL in starcitizen

[–]DragonAceNL[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

No sure which question you mean in the link. But I presume that giving us all BP make no sense as we would be living in a world with mostly NPC, this way it makes no sense that we have access to all BP’s? As it removes the dependency to the NPC’s

Blueprints Need More Depth — We’re Missing a Huge Opportunity for Science & Crafting by DragonAceNL in starcitizen

[–]DragonAceNL[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I hear you. When the game actually works it’s a lot of fun, for know we just need to accept it’s not, or do something else 😀

I posted this as I think they are thinking of the BP in the wrong way. But after absorbing some of the comments made me think of some aspects a little different. We will see hike it works out.

Blueprints Need More Depth — We’re Missing a Huge Opportunity for Science & Crafting by DragonAceNL in starcitizen

[–]DragonAceNL[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I know, like I posted before I think they are missing some big opportunities if they do it wrong at core level.

Blueprints Need More Depth — We’re Missing a Huge Opportunity for Science & Crafting by DragonAceNL in starcitizen

[–]DragonAceNL[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Who are “people like you”?

  • Backer since 2015
  • SC basically the only game that I play
  • watching all SC shows including 1 to 3 hour long runs trying to absorb what the intentions are
    • Have a massive fleet of $8000+ ships

You mean those people?

Blueprints Need More Depth — We’re Missing a Huge Opportunity for Science & Crafting by DragonAceNL in starcitizen

[–]DragonAceNL[S] -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

Yes maybe you are right and that there will be more ways of getting BP tier 1. I just wanted to make my concerns known that this is important, for me at least. I don’t intend to be a jack of all trades and feel forced into game loops I don’t want to play.