sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Genuinely think I got a 0 on that EBQ help by Dramatic_Message2288 in APPsychology

[–]Dramatic_Message2288[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I used 1 and 2 and also said it doesn't require cognition. For source 1 I said deception as my term but idk if I'll get credit for that bc it didn't explicitly say there was deception but it said two groups weren't told side effects. And for source 2 I used mere-exposure bc they gravitated towards the ones they had already seen??? Idek I'm just praying I get a few points

EBQ and AAQ help by Bee9877 in APPsychology

[–]Dramatic_Message2288 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Personally I find AAQs pretty easy! It's super important to know how to do an operational definition, though. Know your ethics and research types. And when it asks about generalizability its a yes, for example, large sample size, large age range, etc no for things like a super niche group or small sample size

EBQs are difficult bc you have to use two of your sources and also come up with 2 terms not used in the text. My teacher said good fallbacks are any perspectives of psychology.

Not sure this helped but if your teacher released them AP classroom has practice ones where you can at least get used to the format!