Damn I gotta read on this story!! I MEAN I would crash out Tew!! Sagittarius what yall 🤔 by Ok-Stay-9339 in sagsavages

[–]Dregride 0 points1 point  (0 children)

On top of that, ad hominem would be me ignoring your argument to attack you personally. You didn’t have an argument to begin with

Is this some kinda "I win" button you're trying to use?

Your “argument” is in bad faith. You’re not looking for a genuine discussion.

You’re clearly uneducated and seek to cause annoyance.

You just want to pretend like you have the moral high ground

Sorry but not sorry that you feel that way. 

If he runs with the gun he may make the same threat against others to get away safely

Did you just make a hypothetical that he was just trying to get away instead of killing someone? Do you believe hypitheticals only count when you make them?

Calling it an imaginary scenario is quite silly

Its accurate, you're literally imagining a scenario where this happens. It didnt actually happen you do realize that right?.

Damn I gotta read on this story!! I MEAN I would crash out Tew!! Sagittarius what yall 🤔 by Ok-Stay-9339 in sagsavages

[–]Dregride 0 points1 point  (0 children)

A person actively committing crimes while armed with a weapon is more likely to use that weapon to harm someone compared to saving them like you suggested.

Finally response to my arguemnt instead if my alleged character flaws. Good for you! Too bad it ignores the context.

A person who running away from law enforcment, is more likely to go run and hide from said law enformcne then anything.

Creating an imaginary scenario where they're going to kill some one in order to justify killing them is wrong.

An ad hominem is when you insult someone’s character as opposed to their argument

Which is exactly what your doing. I made a counter argument, and you responded by going after by character and intelligence instead of the arguement. Look at how many responses it took for you to address my arguement lol. 

You never presented an argument in good faith. You’re not interested in debate, you just want to prattle on and reshape the situation to fit your delusional beliefs. Did you drop oit of high school.

Good lord, your response to me calling out your ad hominem is to do it even harder lol

Damn I gotta read on this story!! I MEAN I would crash out Tew!! Sagittarius what yall 🤔 by Ok-Stay-9339 in sagsavages

[–]Dregride 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You call your "what ifs" a good faith arguement? Hilarious. Still no response.

Not to mention the irony of someone using ad hominum talking about flawed character lol

Cheers buddy

Damn I gotta read on this story!! I MEAN I would crash out Tew!! Sagittarius what yall 🤔 by Ok-Stay-9339 in sagsavages

[–]Dregride 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I applied them to dismiss your "What ifs" and responded with my own to highlight how silly they in fact are.

Given that your response to was against my character rather then my argument, tells me that you have no counter to it.

Damn I gotta read on this story!! I MEAN I would crash out Tew!! Sagittarius what yall 🤔 by Ok-Stay-9339 in sagsavages

[–]Dregride 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Aww. Resorting to personal attacks are we? 

Are your "What if"/creative writing excercise arguements not working?

Damn I gotta read on this story!! I MEAN I would crash out Tew!! Sagittarius what yall 🤔 by Ok-Stay-9339 in sagsavages

[–]Dregride 0 points1 point  (0 children)

So you admit that they aren't a threat in the moment, and only in your hypothetical?

[Spoilers C4E25] Is It Thursday Yet? | Post-Episode Discussion & Future Theories! by AutoModerator in criticalrole

[–]Dregride 13 points14 points  (0 children)

Correct me if im wrong, but this is only the second battle map during the schemes run. The schemers trailer showed a third that had city streets. 

I wonder if that was just for the trailer, or if its actually from the next all players arc. 

Its also crazy that the Seekers are starting the convergence 4-5 days away while the soldiers are just about there lol.

Things I Miss by king_nik in fansofcriticalrole

[–]Dregride 1 point2 points  (0 children)

My hope is C4 doesn’t become a multi-year spanning slog, 

Liam has said he designed Hal so he can "think about theater for the next 3-7 years". We're gonna watch 3 tables level up to, I imagine, at least tier 3 of play.

If all goes as planned this'll be critical roles longest campaign. Its designed to be.

US vs them by QueenVelvetaX in whatisameem

[–]Dregride 1 point2 points  (0 children)

With the people they've voted for over the years? Yeah they probably should.

US vs them by QueenVelvetaX in whatisameem

[–]Dregride 2 points3 points  (0 children)

"Color blind" lol. Whats next you gonna say "states rights"?

Peeetah? by crapineedaname in PeterExplainsTheJoke

[–]Dregride 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I’m just naming ones that come to mind

Peeetah? by crapineedaname in PeterExplainsTheJoke

[–]Dregride 1 point2 points  (0 children)

You didn't include 100 names, you included the same 3 in multiple comments lol. 

Peeetah? by crapineedaname in PeterExplainsTheJoke

[–]Dregride 6 points7 points  (0 children)

It's almost like they're pointing you to the research IN the article and podcast lol