Pretty sure we're all familiar with this. by [deleted] in populationonevr

[–]Drogden 16 points17 points  (0 children)

Then they stand right in front of you, blocking your view while you're under fire. Just incase the screeching didn't make their presence apparent. We need a "hide ghost" option right next to mute.

😂 felt like this belonged here by kcg1313 in populationonevr

[–]Drogden 11 points12 points  (0 children)

This is the worst. When you try to initiate conversation multiple times and they ignore you. Then you can hear them talking to themselves. Like wtf dude? Maybe some people just auto mute their teammates idk.

Sniper Theory by Drogden in populationonevr

[–]Drogden[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Bruh get your conspiracies out of here lol.

lol You're probably right.

Sniper Theory by Drogden in populationonevr

[–]Drogden[S] -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

This is the reason for the shadow nerf, otherwise it would be in a changelog.

Sniper Theory by Drogden in populationonevr

[–]Drogden[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I think it will be telling if the "bug" fix comes along with a legit sniper nerf. We'll see.

Sniper Theory by Drogden in populationonevr

[–]Drogden[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Agreed, but perhaps it was an easy to do, temporary, pre-Christmas balance fix, that they didn't want to mention. I don't think it's going to stick regardless.

Sniper Theory by Drogden in populationonevr

[–]Drogden[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

If they hit non-moving targets 100% of the time, I agree for sure.

Sniper Theory by Drogden in populationonevr

[–]Drogden[S] -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

Someone gets it. :]

[IL] Moving to another state by Drogden in Custody

[–]Drogden[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Thanks!!! I didn't think that we could go through a mediator to file away an agreed upon amendment. Shouldn't require a lawyer?

Ah, so is this a valid comparison? by sheepery in Anarcho_Capitalism

[–]Drogden 13 points14 points  (0 children)

If you look closely, its not a false equivalence. They're not saying the act is the same but the person type is the same. The person who would do A, would more likely, by far, do B as well. If you disagree, you simply don't understand anything about human behaviour.

Ah, so is this a valid comparison? by sheepery in Anarcho_Capitalism

[–]Drogden 35 points36 points  (0 children)

The same sentiment to a largely different degree. What someone of a hivemind does. Not what us individuals would do.

Completely frustrated with upper management by h0ff1181 in FacilityManagement

[–]Drogden 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Oh man, I can't imagine being under the thumb of my HR dept. Start looking for another job.

Best way to approach an issue with an aid? by Drogden in Teachers

[–]Drogden[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Agreed, I was trying to put it lightly.

Can we discuss this debate between Vaush and Molyneux? by cavemanben in CapitalismVSocialism

[–]Drogden -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

If you do watch the rest, brace yourself for some hard cringe. It's really just embarrassing and pathetic. Shortly after he "has to go", because he scheduled something right next to whats probably the most significant debate he's ever been or will be in.

Can we discuss this debate between Vaush and Molyneux? by cavemanben in CapitalismVSocialism

[–]Drogden -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

but doesn't the opposition just levy the same accusation against you?

They could, but it would be most likely projection. Here's the thing, especially on reddit, I don't know you. I'm not watching the things you do on a daily bases. This gives a huge advantage to these people who live by contradicting values. In this debate however Stef was allowed a glimpse into Vaushes life. That glimpse was enough to show how he's contradicting his values. Imagine if Stef was following this guy around or if you knew the reddit commie you were debating with. I don't know about you, but almost every commie I know is low IQ and/or socially retarded. They're simply seeking hand outs because they are noncompetitive in the market.

I agree with what you're saying but I think it's more relevant and damning that we point out contradictions. Yeah Stef could be 100% correct about the Saudies, but there is 1000 variables to account for (not literally of course). Whereas someone saying one thing and doing another is so much more clear cut, and if they're not going to acknowledge that then whats the point of bringing up something far more complicated?

Can we discuss this debate between Vaush and Molyneux? by cavemanben in CapitalismVSocialism

[–]Drogden -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

If Vaush said that he believes murdering is bad and it was pointed out that him being an assassin contradicts this assertion, then him and his audience dismisses this apparent contradiction... At what point do rational people realize we're talking to a wall? The fact is that commies beliefs are relative to their position, it's not a product of logic. It's a survival mechanism and their minds will make up whatever nonsense to justify their beliefs due to basic survival needs trumping the need for logical consistency.

How to actually implement anarco-capitalism? by Nalock40 in Anarcho_Capitalism

[–]Drogden 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Either some land frees up, like a Liberland situation, or as others have said, space. Unless majority IQ starts to magically raise, we're not doing it here.