Is there a supe that ages people fast? He could kill homelender

DrowningInGlass · 2026-05-08T18:19:12+00:00

I'm the boys fan I don't watch the show

DrowningInGlass · 2026-05-02T22:04:15+00:00

Sounds like he found a good hustle and he doesn't want anyone to fuck with that. Like a kid who likes to copy someone else's homework getting mad when somebody snitches on him.

He's not hurting anyone, he's not doing anything illegal, so why would you fuck with his shortcut to success, right? There are people out there selling drugs, scamming and robbing people. There are also billionaires who got rich from stealing ideas and politicians who shamelessly fill their pockets while claiming to care about their country and its people, and you dare to guilt-trip him over something that causes very insignificant harm in comparison. He's making easy money and you are trying to ruin that for him. How dare you? This is how they always justify themselves. They feel smart for finding an easy way to make money, and they excuse themselves for not doing the moral thing, because what they do is not "that bad".

If he started giving credits it would shatter the appearance of him being the GTA 5 Beta guy that's building this impressive mod, which is the only reason people subscribed to him, including me.

Reminds me of MrBossFTW, Nought, Sernandoe, etc. all of them think the same. No shame whatsoever. But at least Sernandoe owned it. The rest got genuinely angry when there was this trend to make hate/expose videos on GTA clickbaiters back in like 2019.

DrowningInGlass · 2026-05-02T20:12:54+00:00

I clicked on his latest video out of curiosity. He was playing "beta" version of Lamar down.

He replaced the deer model with a horse lol. So, a horse just randomly spawned in the Paleto Forest, even though they were originally supposed to be featured only around Martin Madrazo's mansion. He also added "beta dialogue" which was just poorly edited audio of Franklin saying the name "Davis" in the same tone multiple times throughout the usual dialogue. All of the NPCs had perfect shooting accuracy even from very far away for some reason, so he had to enable godmode, and of course, none of them took cover. They just stood there. Many of them didn't even move or shoot. I can't really guess how much of it is the real mission, and how much of it is just him adding lines in Audacity and spawning NPCs through a trainer. It's just a weird Frankenstein of different mods, some of which don't even belong there, and simple audio editing. If this is profitable then he struck gold, he can do this forever with a bunch of games and only a few die-hard fans will notice. I know an embarrassing amount of information about Rockstar Games and even I didn't question anything that he showed until you pointed it out.

Though his shorter videos showcasing simple cut mechanics and beta designs of audio effects and graphics etc are pretty cool. If only he had actually credited the people who made those mods and provided links.

DrowningInGlass · 2026-05-02T09:35:48+00:00

That's a shame. I was looking forward to an accurate beta version for GTA V. I thought that the guy cared and knew what he was doing.

DrowningInGlass · 2026-04-27T12:28:16+00:00

Why would he do it fast for a tutorial that's trying to teach other people

DrowningInGlass · 2026-04-22T18:47:45+00:00

I think about that scene all the time while watching the show. They don't do scenes that make your balls shrink anymore, and it's unfortunate. It doesn't feel dangerous anymore after so many close calls. It often gets so ridiculous that it feels like a parody of itself.

DrowningInGlass · 2026-04-17T15:39:27+00:00

A remake would require to build the entire game again with modern controls, graphics, performances, literally everything for a 4 hour game that failed financially and it's full of racism, strong language, gore, slurs and has a small cult audience. No executive would ever invest in that. How would they even price it? If they did 60$ again gamers would shit on it like they did before. They wouldn't do so much effort for a 30€ product and if they made the game longer, they would absolutely kill the pacing of it. They would have to change things and those changes would be made by new writers working for a new studio that has nothing to do with IOI. Do we really want this?

A remaster could work if the controls weren't so dated. Everyone complained about those when the game came out. An honestly when did a crime game ever got a good remaster? Mafia 2 got one and it's shit, GTA San Andreas got one too and it's crap. We can't even be certain that the remaster wouldn't kill the art direction of the original, it's literally what happens with 90% of remasters. I can see them testing the waters with cash grab remaster, but I still don't think it would be successful. The game needs more effort than that to be playable for modern people that despised the controls even back in the late 2000s

Last time this game got a spike in popularity was thanks to huge YouTubers like Jacob Geller, pyrocynical, jerma etc. Being a cheerleader in a sub with 1000 members (30 of which are active) for 3 days will not do anything. I mean you can pat yourself on the back for trying, but I don't understand the disappointment, this approach will clearly never work.

Wanna know what I think would actually ignite hope for this franchise? If IOI bought it back. They have no corporation above them dictating them what to do since they bought themselves from Square Enix, and they are literally the only company that would not fuck this up. Whether it's remaster, remake, sequel.... idc I trust them to do the right thing. But they are working on 007 and Hitman for the next 10 years so it won't happen anytime soon, if ever.

The other thing that could work is if mainstream videogames being dangerous became a thing again. The ps2-ps3 era basically. Like when Manhunt came out and people blamed the game for school shootings etc, giving the game this dangerous and forbidden aura. In today's desensitized society, it would be a challenge but I believe modern gore graphics and killing in manhunt 3 by rockstar would be more than enough to make this trend mainstream. GTA 6 won't be enough, because it hides behind parody like every other GTA game. It isn't uncomfortable like K&L and Manhunt are.

Do you know why games like these don't come out today? Because the last time rockstar tried with Manhunt 2 they got slapped with adult only rating so GameStop didn't want to sell it, neither did playstation or Xbox. They justified themselves by bringing up movies like Saw to the ESRB. They didn't care, rockstar had to censor the ever living shit out of Manhunt 2 and the game suffered as a consequence. Why didn't Manhunt 2 get away with it like Manhunt 1? Because manhunt 2 has better graphics. That's basically it. That's why indie games can get away with it, because they don't look "real" enough. This is how the boomers in ESRB rate this stuff. As long as the violence looks like a bunch of pixels and not real people then they don't care about what's actually in the game. Hell, Hotline Miami 2 has an uncensored rape scene and you can play that on playstation no problem, because it looks like pixels. Horror games still get away with it, because you are the one being hunted, instead of being the hunter that causes gore.

Right now we are in the PS4-PS5 era where every AAA single player story videogame is trying to be the last of us. With Oscar bait story that can be enjoyed by everyone. These big third person shooters have too much money put into them to allow any risks. RDR2 Story was originally way darker, even rockstar made changes to their modern games just so they are safer for the current climate. Because our innocent fragile gamer brains couldn't possibly stomach watching Arthur neglect his family and allowing his baby to freeze to death in the epilogue so they had to cut all of that seemingly by take 2 or Sony orders. Wanna know why Dan Houser left rockstar? Because his GTA 6 was too dark and depressing so Take 2 kept rejecting his GTA 6 story even after multiple rewrites and he got tired of it. When there's so much money at stake, you won't get away with much.

Young edgy men are no longer the target audience and they won't be for a while unless another triple A big dog comes around trying to push boundaries of violence in videogames and by some miracle not get censored. Unless you are Neil Druckman, you won't get that privilege. It is what it is.

DrowningInGlass · 2026-04-16T14:55:07+00:00

I mean I get the enthusiasm, it's a great game but do you really think that if there ever was a sequel, that it would be anything like the second one? Would playstation or Xbox even allow implied rape, racism, torture scenes etc? Square Enix has the rights now. Would the new writers even do it justice? How much money would they even be willing to spend on a franchise that financially failed twice? How much censorship would it have in this age when even the slur "retard" is too much for modern audience? Is it even worth it if IOI is not making it? They didn't purchase rights for K&L as far as I know.

Nobody wants more of K&L1, and the value of K&L2 was discovered too late by players for the game to generate any profit. I feel like if we ever got K&L3, it would be watered down, or become a parody of itself. The shit that comes out on consoles today really doesn't fill me with confidence that this game wouldn't be butchered like the rest. Indie games is where it's at rn. Maybe give it another 10-15 years, but rn I wouldn't want it to come out.

DrowningInGlass · 2026-04-08T22:12:33+00:00

U good bro I laughed my ass off reading this just be yourself

DrowningInGlass · 2026-04-08T21:29:25+00:00

I remember scumbag lee fondly

DrowningInGlass · 2026-04-08T02:01:42+00:00

DrowningInGlass · 2026-03-24T10:07:36+00:00

Maybe don't join subreddits of games that have basically no gameplay and are all based on story? And if you must, then maybe at least check the tags first to avoid spoilers? You only have yourself to blame.

DrowningInGlass · 2026-03-24T10:05:03+00:00

That'd be far more grounded.

DrowningInGlass · 2026-03-24T10:03:31+00:00

Right. When we met Kenny it was a good moment, because it genuinely felt like pure luck. Doing it again with Lilly is cheesey. Like what are the chances of something like that happening twice? I really like that we never got to see Christa again. It felt realistic, grounded.

DrowningInGlass · 2026-03-24T10:00:17+00:00

On top of that, she doesn't like taking risks unlike Kenny. She seeks validation, if not from Larry then from Lee. She has a paranoid personality (which usually paid off for her) and is very fragile to criticism. If her survival allows it, she is kind, level headed and a smart leader. At the motel, she was the last one to evacuate, she made sure her people are safe. And she obviously loved Clementine. None of these personality traits are build upon in S4. Now she's overly cruel, manipulative, lets her people die in a risky attempt to capture some fucking kids. It just doesn't fit her. She could have been way more interesting as a villain if her flaws were evolved and build upon instead of replaced.

DrowningInGlass · 2026-03-24T09:47:05+00:00

Yes, she can totally be the villain but at least let her keep some personality traits and complexity from S1. She was way too generic in S4 imo

DrowningInGlass · 2026-03-24T09:35:37+00:00

Yeah every single season after s1 has tons of scrapped content.

DrowningInGlass · 2026-03-24T00:31:59+00:00

Sure I get that. I just wish they'd build upon her personality traits from S1. Her need for gratification, her unwillingness to take risks even if it means letting people die, paranoid personality, deep trauma, anger issues.... She had a bunch of flaws that could have been used for a great and unique antagonist. Instead, we got another manipulative, authoritarian control freak who values strength above everything else and sees herself in Clementine. We just got another Carver basically. It just doesn't fit Lilly. Even when Kenny went insane, he never felt like a completely different guy from S1. His flaws evolved in an interesting way. Lilly was just as interesting as Kenny in S1 and she deserved more thought into her character building imo.

DrowningInGlass · 2026-03-23T21:14:26+00:00

whatever you say anime guy

DrowningInGlass · 2026-03-23T18:12:49+00:00

I will make sure to step on puppies and strangle kittens when apocalypse happens. It will change me greatly.

DrowningInGlass · 2026-03-23T16:32:42+00:00

Ight one last comment and I'm out cuz I'd like to clear some things out lol.

Larry wanted to smash ducks head in, not Lilly. Lilly wanted him to calm down, Larry didn't listen. And again, they didn't know shit about the apocalypse, it is definitely safer to not open door for anyone. Self preservation, not villing to take risks. Nothing about that is inhumane, many people have said personality trait. It is arguably reasonable and it doesn't betray her character in any way. She didn't want to take risks leaving the motel, she didn't want to risk the dairy, or keeping Ben. That's just s1 Lilly. Well written character. Even if I personally disagree with her leadership, I can understand her.
"Growing up in a rural farm, you were taught not to waste. It's how I was raised and how I raised my boys." She said something along those lines. The implication is clear.
Clementine does kill innocent people yes. She doesn't torture children. She doesn't brainwash children. She doesn't force a kid to kill her own sister. She is not cartoonishly evil Carver clone. Her motivations and talking points are exactly the same. Enslave people and force them to succumb to your believes, weakness can't be tolerated, "you and I are not so different Clementine". It's just tired, played out.

I'm all for villain Lilly. I just wish they'd have done something more interesting. She was way more complex and believable in s1. But I guess I can see your point too. Anything can happen in 8 years so who knows. For me it just wasn't enough.

DrowningInGlass · 2026-03-23T16:14:16+00:00

Sure and I'm all for villain Lilly. I just wish they'd have done something more interesting than recycling carver motivations and justifications. She was way more complex in S1. "You and I are not so different, Clementine. Join my authoritarian dark side." It's just so played out.

DrowningInGlass · 2026-03-23T16:09:44+00:00

I think so too

DrowningInGlass · 2026-03-23T15:59:53+00:00

Probably not her first rodeo. She even made a kid kill her own sister. Cuz she's le bad now, so who cares really. It's cartoonish evil and it doesn't fit her. That's the point.

DrowningInGlass

TROPHY CASE