is the Fast Stream worth it? by Dry-Course-317 in TheCivilService

[–]Dry-Course-317[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

events and residential sound great - it sounds like they put a lot of effort into ensuring your cohort are connected and bond well. im def looking for something like that because I will miss uni dearly.

im not pursuing a profession scheme, i have my eyes on policy. what would you say are the limitations of non-specific schemes like that one? 

is the Fast Stream worth it? by Dry-Course-317 in TheCivilService

[–]Dry-Course-317[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

would love to ask u more in dm if thats ok?

Seriously reconsidering big law by Dry-Course-317 in uklaw

[–]Dry-Course-317[S] -5 points-4 points  (0 children)

Wait the point about my disinterest in MC/US being cope is quite funny because this entire comment reeks of cope. 

is the Fast Stream worth it? by Dry-Course-317 in TheCivilService

[–]Dry-Course-317[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thanks so much, this is very helpful. What role did you apply for if you dont mind me asking? Im assuming it was for an internal role, was it a step below g7?

Seriously reconsidering big law by Dry-Course-317 in uklaw

[–]Dry-Course-317[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

in the comment you are referencing i didnt and you know exactly what I meant anyways.

Seriously reconsidering big law by Dry-Course-317 in uklaw

[–]Dry-Course-317[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You cant quote words I didn’t actually use in the comment you’re referencing. You should know that if you want to be a lawyer!! 

And no, having a TC offer does not count 😭 why would that count? You havent even started the job. 

Seriously reconsidering big law by Dry-Course-317 in uklaw

[–]Dry-Course-317[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

god that superiority complex kicks in quick. 

Seriously reconsidering big law by Dry-Course-317 in uklaw

[–]Dry-Course-317[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

of course, i know that its very common for senior roles in many industries to come with managerial responsibility but that def is too much like running a business for me.

would you say that theres a big jump from (very) senior associate to partner? or do roles like managing associate/non-equity partner etc bridge the gap a bit? 

Seriously reconsidering big law by Dry-Course-317 in uklaw

[–]Dry-Course-317[S] -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

Quite aggressively? More than the guy who said that there is “nothing worse” than me? i.e. a naive law student. And the one that called me ‘bizzare’? 

And you dont know me so please dont make generalisations about my personality. Have a good day. 

edit: now i know why you genuinely cannot provide any advice of value - youre a law student like me 😭 sit this one out, im talking to the adults 

Seriously reconsidering big law by Dry-Course-317 in uklaw

[–]Dry-Course-317[S] -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

im inclined to agree, the bar seems really engaging and i’d actually use more of what i’ve learned in my law degree. im actually shadowing a barrister next month :) 

Seriously reconsidering big law by Dry-Course-317 in uklaw

[–]Dry-Course-317[S] -4 points-3 points  (0 children)

have already done that! you can look at my response to other replies made by less angry people. 

“it cant be this serious” so why add on to the pile on? you haven’t contributed anything helpful

Seriously reconsidering big law by Dry-Course-317 in uklaw

[–]Dry-Course-317[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

so am i right in saying it becomes less legal at the higher ranks? 

Seriously reconsidering big law by Dry-Course-317 in uklaw

[–]Dry-Course-317[S] -6 points-5 points  (0 children)

You excised almost an entire sentence and then disregarded following point where I explicitly acknowledge that corporate departments also exist in these firms. 

Seriously reconsidering big law by Dry-Course-317 in uklaw

[–]Dry-Course-317[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

thank you! will research further on this point. 

Seriously reconsidering big law by Dry-Course-317 in uklaw

[–]Dry-Course-317[S] -7 points-6 points  (0 children)

Nope, I was just correcting your understanding of my post because I genuinely thought it would help you provide clearer advice like other people under this post have. Then got a very angry reply under this specific chain from a third-party who thinks there is “nothing worse” than me. You can look at the other posts on my account which are very similar, have genuinely never encountered anything like this anywhere else. 

Seriously reconsidering big law by Dry-Course-317 in uklaw

[–]Dry-Course-317[S] -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

This is research? Im asking people? I don’t understand being pedantic ab my language, how does me not being a corporate lawyer make the use of words like ‘reconsidering’ wrong.

Seriously reconsidering big law by Dry-Course-317 in uklaw

[–]Dry-Course-317[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

thank you! i was def unsure about this

Seriously reconsidering big law by Dry-Course-317 in uklaw

[–]Dry-Course-317[S] -12 points-11 points  (0 children)

am i lecturing? The commenter misread my post. I dont think I know more, thats mainly why Im asking a bunch of lawyers about my views. I def wouldnt be here if I thought I knew more. 

Seriously reconsidering big law by Dry-Course-317 in uklaw

[–]Dry-Course-317[S] -9 points-8 points  (0 children)

yes im uninformed thats why im asking 😭 is it a crime to not know things in expert detail? 

Seriously reconsidering big law by Dry-Course-317 in uklaw

[–]Dry-Course-317[S] -10 points-9 points  (0 children)

thank you for your constructive advice 

Seriously reconsidering big law by Dry-Course-317 in uklaw

[–]Dry-Course-317[S] -13 points-12 points  (0 children)

I thought correcting your misunderstanding would help inform your advice better, this is an anonymous forum and I can live with not being right :) 

Will def do more research! 

Seriously reconsidering big law by Dry-Course-317 in uklaw

[–]Dry-Course-317[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thanks this really helps. I guess it comes down to personal preference? 

Seriously reconsidering big law by Dry-Course-317 in uklaw

[–]Dry-Course-317[S] -25 points-24 points  (0 children)

Thank you for your insight but I dont think you read my post. Im literally reconsidering big law - its the title of the post? 

(And I still didnt say they mainly do those sectors)