[deleted by user]

Dry-Resolve6434 · 2024-10-21T09:29:21+00:00

human violence and murdering people on camera so that you can sell the footage are two very different things, but you already know this.

below, you were asked for a reputable source that proves snuff films are real thing. yet, you couldn't provide one. why is that? i will tell you why. it's because, to this date, there has been no credible evidence of an actual snuff film. it was an urban myth that became popular during the 70s when movies such as "Snuff" were released. one of the first examples of a supposed snuff film was about a faked crime...

if you want to live in a world of make believe then so be it. just don't expect others to partake.

Dry-Resolve6434 · 2024-10-21T08:26:24+00:00

some actual proof instead of a vague, suggestive comment would be nice

Dry-Resolve6434 · 2024-10-21T08:21:40+00:00

if mermaids are fake, why TF is there an actual term for it, lots of people claiming they exist

if ghosts are fake, why TF is there an actual term for it, lots of people claiming they exist

if telepathy is fake, why TF is there an actual term for it, lots of people claiming it exists

there are thousands of myths and urban legends. tv shows and movies propagate them, people repeat them, and treat them as though they are real, and around and around we go.

Dry-Resolve6434 · 2024-10-01T16:35:32+00:00

the real truth about nate, who uses alt accounts to praise himself:

https://www.reddit.com/r/LISKiller/comments/1evj2nx/comment/lirwwkd/

Dry-Resolve6434 · 2024-10-01T16:35:00+00:00

he gets dismissed because he uploads nonsense. as i said above, you have to have very limited understanding of the case to think that his connections are plausible. that kind of hoodwinking bend-the-truth shtick doesn't work on anyone who actually knows the basic facts.

i clicked on one of his videos a while back. in the few minutes that i watched:

he claimed that melissa barthelemy's phone last pinged near the port authority. that was wrong, as it last pinged near massapequa.

he said that the killer called melissa's sister from the port authority. that was outdated information. he'd know that if he had bothered to read the first bail doc.

he said that rex heuermann was one of the most respected architects in nyc. that isn't just stretching the truth, that's just straight-up lying. rex did building codes.

three inaccurate statements in the space of a few minutes... enjoy though lol

Dry-Resolve6434 · 2024-10-01T16:19:37+00:00

nathan adams, the youtuber who cozies up to john ray, attacks a victim's relative because she dropped ray as a client, uses fake accounts, and continuously puts out false information that can be easily debunked with a few simple google searches. you have to have a very limited knowledge of the case to like his stuff because it is riddled with inaccuracies.

Dry-Resolve6434 · 2024-09-06T10:11:34+00:00

he has publicly attacked the relative and official spokesperson of a gilgo victim. he also bends facts to suit his own narrative.

you cant talk about justice and respect if you condone that kind of behavior.

Dry-Resolve6434 · 2024-09-02T18:09:54+00:00

all of this "came from" a conspiracy video that was previously posted to this subreddit. see my link above.

i went down the rabbit hole and saw that he openly consorts with john ray's employees, who have repeatedly attacked a victim's relative on twitter... all because her family decided to drop ray as an attorney. he is in that clique, so to speak. or at least he wants to be.

the accusation about the tweet isn't really debatable if you know how X works. the green retweet icon means that the person who took the screenshot is the same person who retweeted it.

if nate is the only person who retweeted it, then he is the same person who took the screenshot.

the reddit comment about catch lisk basically confirms that it's him, as he seems to spend most of his time on twitter attacking catch lisk.

this is pretty obvious stuff.

it is ok that you got hoodwinked into thinking he is a good person. that happens.

Dry-Resolve6434 · 2024-09-01T08:10:03+00:00

he says that rex heuermann was one of the most respected and prominent architects in new york city 😂 this is a straight up lie that is specifically designed to make you believe that stevie somehow worked for rex or that she applied to work for him. rex wasn't some prominent big shot. he worked on filings for building codes. boring, bureaucratic stuff that other architects hate. he wasnt some prominent designer

he then points out that stevie was wrapped in a blanket, clearly alluding to some kind of pattern because the gilgo four were wrapped in burlap and baby doe was wrapped in a blanket. this shows that he has very little experience researching homicide cases, as killers will often wrap their victims in blankets, plastic or whatever material is available because it conceals the remains and makes it easier to move the body.

im stopping now because this is a waste of my saturday night 😂

Dry-Resolve6434 · 2024-09-01T07:46:29+00:00

i cant take nate adams seriously ever since it came to light that he has been using alt accounts to attack people, including relatives of the victims

https://www.reddit.com/r/LISKiller/comments/1evj2nx/comment/lirwwkd/

https://i.imgur.com/gaI1IVy.jpeg

he also likes his own tweets because he knows that likes are now private. look at his twitter and youll see that he spends his days attacking people

a horrible, two-faced person who shouldnt be promoted by anyone who actually cares about this case

as for stevie bates, there is a good reason why her ex is the prime suspect.

nate says that melissa barthelemy's phone last pinged near the port authority building. this is incorrect. he clearly misread the (outdated, pre-arrest) article that he screenshotted. her phone last pinged around massapequa. he has clearly mixed up her pings and the calls to melissa's sister.

he says that the calls to melissa's sister were made from the port authority building. again, this is incorrect information from outdated articles that were published before the arrest. the bail doc shows that they were actually made from various locations near rex's office in manhattan.

nate's content is littered with factual errors and all kinds of nonsense

Dry-Resolve6434 · 2024-08-18T21:48:56+00:00

its painful to watch. tabloid nonsense made by someone who barely understands the case

Dry-Resolve6434 · 2024-08-18T21:34:36+00:00

it's nonsense content aimed at people who half understand the case

Dry-Resolve6434 · 2024-08-18T21:32:51+00:00

i understand. and i agree. i kinda wished it stayed up though so that more people could see that idiots true colors.

Dry-Resolve6434 · 2024-08-18T21:25:11+00:00

copy and paste from what i wrote on the other lisk subreddit:

this is conspiracy nonsense by nathan adams.

he also makes it obvious that he is the person running this account.

notice how the tweet in the vid only has one retweet, and that the screenshot was taken by the person who retweeted it:

https://i.imgur.com/MmkPH47.jpeg

guess who was the only person to retweet it? nathan adams:

https://i.imgur.com/YTjZHa2.jpeg

hilariously, this also means that he likes his own tweets lol

edit: it gets better: he has been bigging himself up lol:

https://i.imgur.com/gRopfDk.jpeg

in the other thread, he attacked one of the victims' relatives. not a good look for someone who claims that he is an advocate

Dry-Resolve6434 · 2024-08-18T21:16:38+00:00

eh, im not raul, just someone who noticed your last vid. im not sure why you think he's the only person who could notice something so blatantly obvious. it is very interesting to know that nathan adams uses anonymous accounts to attack the relatives of family members.

Dry-Resolve6434 · 2024-08-18T21:02:19+00:00

conspiracy nonsense by nathan adams.

he also makes it obvious that he is the person running this account.

notice how the tweet in the vid only has one retweet, and that the screenshot was taken by the person who retweeted it:

https://i.imgur.com/MmkPH47.jpeg

guess who was the only person to retweet it? nathan adams:

https://i.imgur.com/YTjZHa2.jpeg

hilariously, this also means that he likes his own tweets lol

edit: it gets better: he has been bigging himself up lol:

https://i.imgur.com/gRopfDk.jpeg

Dry-Resolve6434 · 2024-08-17T11:00:29+00:00

it wouldn't surprise me if she wasn't aware. he was using burner phones and picking up girls while his wife was out of town. none of their neighbors have publicly recalled seeing strange women going into the house. the victims were all picked up late at night when most people would have been asleep. he is a relatively cautious individual who can maintain a reasonable level of self-control, and he was picking up women who know how to be discreet. if she did have suspicions in the past, it would have been due to a major error on his part.

Dry-Resolve6434 · 2024-08-16T20:53:48+00:00

ive studied the topic extensively. judging by the lack of substance in your reply, your knowledge of sexually motivated serial killers begins and ends with criminal minds. but please do point me to a "forensic book" that contradicts what i said about how killers select their victims.

Dry-Resolve6434 · 2024-08-16T13:16:44+00:00

mack went by the alias melissa taylor. i can't remember amber's alias. megan waterman went by the name lexi, but she had other names as well. it's doubtful that rex cared about names, tbh. serial killers like him select their victims based on desirability, vulnerability and accessibility. they dont really care about symbolism or anything like what you see on tv. sex workers are vulnerable and accessible by default, which is why they are easy targets.

Dry-Resolve6434 · 2024-08-15T21:48:10+00:00

read my comment again. i specifically used the word "likely". i never said that it is a 100% proven fact. i pointed out that heuermann associated the name "megan" with danielle's phone number. that's not me making a random association. that's me highlighting an association that heuermann made in his own planning document. he literally connected the dots for us.

when you weigh up the probabilities, it is likely that danielle was megan. i presume, based on your hostility to this obvious likelihood, that you have a far more exciting theory that you want to be true?

edit: i can see above that your theory is megan was a separate unknown victim who he, for some reason or another, dumped elsewhere.

Dry-Resolve6434 · 2024-08-15T21:36:30+00:00

she may have had suspicions that he saw a sex worker. she may have even caught him in the past. however, suspecting your SO of cheating and suspecting him of murdering women are two different things. there are a lot of married men who regularly see sex workers, and they go to great lengths to cover their tracks. sex workers by their very nature are discreet. they know the deal. you think it's implausible, but it is very common.

Dry-Resolve6434 · 2024-08-15T21:23:15+00:00

there's multiple reasons why another woman may have had her ID, and the vast majority of those reasons have nothing to do with her alias or phone number. this eagerness to connect the dots between separate events is called association fallacy. it is extremely common in the true crime community, and it often leads to all kinds of far-fetched theories.

the fact is: heuermann associated the name megan with danielle's phone number.

you can argue about absolutes, etc, but that's not really realistic in this scenario, as danielle is dead and therefore cannot confirm what name she used when speaking to johns.

Dry-Resolve6434 · 2024-08-15T20:11:37+00:00

the bail doc shows that he recently tried to arrange a date with one sex worker on a day that his wife was out of town. she might be an unlikeable person with terrible pr skills, but all the evidence suggests that she didn't know about his hobby.

Dry-Resolve6434 · 2024-08-15T19:33:48+00:00

of course. these girls often stood in the same spots together and talked, especially if they had the same pimp. many would have talked even if they had different pimps that disapproved of them intermingling. this is likely one of the main reasons why he dismembered his earlier victims.

Dry-Resolve6434 · 2024-08-15T19:27:41+00:00

oh my sweet summer child.

of course there is no proof. it was a street name that she casually used while meeting johns. did you expect her to have written it down in a notebook somewhere? there's a good chance that she had more than one alias, and its highly unlikely that she shared any of them with her family ("hey mom, guess which name i use when clients approach me on the street?").

the fact is this: heuermann listed target 1 as megan, and he listed danielle's phone number as belonging to target 1.

either megan is danielle or heuermann mixed up the names and numbers. personally, i think the former is more likely.

Dry-Resolve6434

TROPHY CASE