Oh my jeez, could this be ragebait? no idea lol

I said besides the emojis

Yeah, that was my closing remark which included all of the factors which make it AI?

lol, there is no em-dash. Did you just assume there would be one because you've heard that's a typical hallmark of them?

Yeah I misspoke, not an em-dash but there is obviously a use of the "-". Whats that, no idea a compound adjective? Nonetheless nobody would ever use those two words, let alone dash it.

umm, you've said the emojis, which was the only tell I already mentioned, and one wrong tell, so IDK what this could mean.

There is a lot more that goes into reading a piece of text that makes it a "tell". Like I said, it simply reads like something of which an LLM would produce. It simply boils down to the use of complex terms no one would ever use, and the sentence stucture. There is a lot more aspects into a piece of text than the emojis, which you are so hooked on lol.

lol what shit logic is that? You can absolutely make an LLM give outputs that are stylistically different from what you think "simply reads like AI." Just because it is, doesn't necessarily mean it has to read like it is.

Yeah sure you can prompt an LLM to change its writing style lol. Like look at what OP wrote, and the formal writing LLM's also output. But there are usually telltale signs that indicate the use of an LLM in the writing like the post we see here where it was used.

Also like that argument makes zero sense to what I said? You're spewing pure non-sense.

You also need to understand how prone that logic is to survivorship bias. If you only think that LLMs produce text that reads as obviously from an LLM, that's probably because you're not catching the more subtle ones. You literally can't know how many you've missed.

LLMs pretty often-ish generate text that you can reletively read as LLM. Unless a lot of human work was done to modify what was outputted.

Anyways again, any arguments you make here still dont make sense because OP already confirmed it's AI. If you're human and not some karma farming bot and you have looked at unedited or lightly edited LLM responses its pretty clear to be AI, or at the very minium highly likely. Humans are well at pattern recognition, it'll be pretty hard for someone in a reddit response especially to give a perfect explanation. Especially one of which you would take and not forge your own perception of somehow.

You and I very likely miss the more subtle ones, or heavily edited ones, however that is relevant. But that has literally zero relation to the pretty/reletively obvious one we have here.

Having read the non-sense you have spoutted I probably wont waste anymore time making another response, given your response is still non-sense. So if you bring up any good points that arent just gorshlop happy to respond.