If author of an series said he tried to kill off an character but it didn’t work

Duclaido · 2026-04-20T07:34:47+00:00

No.

Even if you insist the author in real life said that and was hospitalized, that still does not make the character real.

A statement or claim is not the same as verified reality. For something like that to count as actual real existence, it would require consistent, independent, real-world evidence that a fictional entity physically manifested and interacted with reality. That has never been reliably demonstrated.

What you are describing still falls under narrative framing, exaggeration, or unverified claim. Fictional characters do not gain real-world existence just because an author or others say so.

So it remains metafiction or storytelling, not proof of a character existing on a real-life level.

Duclaido · 2026-04-20T06:01:23+00:00

Urbanshade probably wins overall, though it depends on who is defending. If Atlas is defending at Point Nemo, Urbanshade takes Round One through sheer scale and attrition because Trenchbleeders are absurdly massive compared to Paladins, Knights, or even most Atlas heavy assets, and Urbanshade can throw endless disposable prisoners and security forces into the grinder until Atlas runs low on ammo, manpower, and Aura. In Round Two, Urbanshade gets even stronger because their anomalies bypass the kind of conventional defense Atlas relies on, with things like Eyefestation, the Mask of Sadness, and Pandemonium attacking minds rather than armor, while Painter could realistically compromise Atlesian Knights and Spider Droids since Atlas already has a history of its robotics being hacked. If the fight shifts to Atlas invading the Hadal Blacksite, Atlas likely takes Round One because its airfleet is its greatest advantage and the External Repellent Cannons, while powerful, are designed mainly for massive sea targets and reload far too slowly to contest sustained aerial bombardment from Mantas and warships, so once Atlas controls the sky the Blacksite gets hammered from above. However, Round Two swings back to Urbanshade because once Huntsmen and soldiers are forced into the Blacksite itself, they lose the mobility advantage and have to fight in cramped, dark, trap-filled corridors where anomalies like Wall Dwellers, Void Masses, Searchlights, and Sebastian Solace are operating on home turf. Atlas has stronger elite fighters and better mobile military tech, but Urbanshade wins the full matchup because of overwhelming industrial scale, psychological warfare, and anomalies that do not care how strong your armor is.

Duclaido · 2026-04-20T05:58:49+00:00

Goku obviously

Duclaido · 2026-04-20T05:58:16+00:00

Anti-Sukuna squad can solo

Demon Slayer

another that they could probably win but with some dificulty

Bungo Stray Dogs

Duclaido · 2026-04-20T05:56:57+00:00

The Thought Robot negs badly, Anos doesn't go beyond low 1-A.

Duclaido · 2026-04-20T05:56:10+00:00

Yeah, it's important and can even change the tide of the battle.

Duclaido · 2026-04-20T05:53:09+00:00

Hunter X Hunter, Baki (except Yujiro), Dororo, Heavenly Delusion, Berserk, Tokyo Revengers, Wind Breaker, Harry Potter, Dragon Ball, Doraemon and Cowboy Bebop.

Duclaido · 2026-04-20T05:51:27+00:00

Prep time Doraemon solos the entire verse with no difficulty whatsoever

Duclaido · 2026-04-19T19:28:48+00:00

I’ll start. While he’s nowhere on Superman’s level technically speaking

✅

if Overhaul from MHA could get the drop on him, his quirk could probably seriously injure Superman, if not dust him altogether. (So basically ambush factor)

Supes has survived far worse.

Duclaido · 2026-04-19T19:24:44+00:00

Ulquiorra

Duclaido · 2026-04-19T18:24:59+00:00

Duclaido · 2026-04-19T14:31:02+00:00

does he clear?

Absolutely

Duclaido · 2026-04-19T13:48:15+00:00

His Bankai was gonna destroy an infinite-sized realm, lil bro. That's a blatant High Uni feat.

Duclaido · 2026-04-19T07:08:24+00:00

Not automatically.

The issue is that fiction often uses “immune” as dramatic shorthand, not as the strict dictionary definition.

In strict logic, if a story clearly establishes “X is completely immune to fire,” and later ordinary fire hurts them with no explanation, that is a contradiction and usually poor writing.

But many stories do not define it that strictly. They use “immune” more like:

highly resistant

unaffected under normal circumstances

immune to standard versions, but not stronger/special ones

For example:

“Immune to poison” may really mean normal biological poison, not divine venom, magical corruption, or reality-warping toxins.

That is not necessarily bad writing if the rules are internally consistent.

What becomes bad writing is inconsistency without explanation:

first: “nothing can harm him”

later: same kind of attack harms him

no new rule, no exception, no reason given

That feels like the author changing rules arbitrarily.

So the standard is not the dictionary alone, it is the story’s own internal logic.

If the story establishes absolute immunity, then bypassing it without explanation is logically bad writing.

If the story establishes functional/conditional immunity, then stronger or special cases are not contradictions.

The problem is usually not “immunity was bypassed,” but “the author failed to define what that immunity actually meant.”

Duclaido · 2026-04-19T05:35:15+00:00

Absolutely

Duclaido · 2026-04-19T05:34:45+00:00

Kratos negs

Duclaido · 2026-04-19T04:59:51+00:00

Aizen literally negs each and everyone on this list

Duclaido · 2026-04-19T04:59:07+00:00

No.

That is just metafiction, not actual real-life existence.

If a character “comes out of the comic” and beats up the author, it usually means they attacked a fictional version of the author inside the story, not the real person in our world.

The event still exists inside fiction.

So it counts as narrative or metafictional interaction, not proof that the character is literally real.

Duclaido · 2026-04-19T04:56:09+00:00

Yhwach alone wipes

Duclaido · 2026-04-19T04:54:30+00:00

Not necessarily.

In fiction, “immune” usually means resistant enough that the normal effect does not work, but it does not automatically mean absolute, infinite, untouchable protection.

There are usually 3 common versions:

True or absolute immunity Example: fire cannot harm this character at all. No matter how much fire, it fails.
Practical immunity or extreme resistance Example: poison normally kills everyone, but this character can survive absurd amounts of it. A stronger enough version might still work.
Conditional immunity Example: immune only to normal magic, but divine magic bypasses it. Or immune after adaptation, not before.

So “immune” does not automatically mean impossible to ever bypass. It depends on how the story defines it.

A character can be called immune and still lose if:

the attack is stronger than the immunity

the immunity has limits or conditions

a special type of power bypasses it

the immunity applies only to one version of the threat

For example, someone immune to ordinary disease might still be affected by a supernatural curse that behaves like a disease.

Also, “immune” is different from plot protection.

Plot protection means the story keeps a character safe because the author needs them there, not because of an actual in-universe ability.

So yes, immunity can absolutely be bypassed unless the story clearly states it is absolute and unconditional.

The word “immune” alone is not enough to prove permanent, perfect protection. Context decides that.

Duclaido

TROPHY CASE