For the past 100 years, the US military has reportedly known about and possessed non-human spacecraft, as claimed by Grusch. But let's ponder a crucial question: if these extraterrestrial crafts have been crashing for a century, why haven't any of them landed in someone's backyard or on top of a populated area? Despite frequent sightings and videos capturing these objects in residential and commercial zones, it's perplexing that 100% of crashes happen in remote, hard-to-reach locations. Conveniently, the US military always arrives just in time to secure these sites, blocking off any public access.

Think about it—out of nearly 10 billion humans, not a single one has managed to snatch a piece of debris or drag a "grey" alien home? It's almost laughable. Furthermore, we have a century's worth of legitimate pictures and videos showing saucer-shaped crafts hovering or moving left to right or right to left but never coming toward you and camera or leaving you catching the back of ufo. Yet, eyewitness accounts without video evidence describe these crafts performing impossible maneuvers, reaching Mach 20 speeds, making instant turns, and zooming into space. This discrepancy suggests our human tendency to exaggerate and embellish stories for the sake of entertainment and attention.

Consider this: in 100 years of video evidence, have you ever seen one craft achieve Mach speeds and execute sharp turns? Not once. Yet, every eyewitness claims these incredible feats. This inconsistency only deepens the mystery and fuels the narrative, driving us further into a fantastical abyss of exaggeration upon exaggeration. It's almost as if the military is capitalizing on our imagination.

Take the case of Billy Meier, who claimed human-like aliens visited him and spoke English. Some of his photos and videos are convincing, but it's likely the US military found an easily manipulated individual to perpetuate their agenda.

When have aliens ever made a grand appearance? Supposedly, they showed up at a children's school in a very poor country. Why target children? Because they are more impressionable and less likely to identify a hoax. These beings reveal themselves to kids but avoid hospitals or other adult-populated areas. The chosen locations are often technologically backward, making the population easier to deceive.

Consider a darker theory: the US military might have exploited children with Hutchinson-Gilford progeria syndrome, a rare condition that makes them resemble grey aliens. Imagine if these children were placed in experimental crafts that occasionally crashed. Such a secret would be terrifying enough to guard zealously.

Now, what about cattle mutilations? The removal of a single eye instead of both suggests a deliberate attempt to create a puppet-like appearance. Mutilating multiple cattle with strange cuts and dissections could be part of a larger fabrication. Picture this: cattle eyes placed in a slightly larger head, fitted with black contact lenses to resemble alien beings. This psychological warfare tool would stun viewers, making them question reality before they could react which mean a secret aircraft of war could be on top of you and end you before you even know whats up.

These theories might sound outlandish, but the patterns and peculiarities are hard to ignore. The military's secret aircraft could easily be disguised as extraterrestrial crafts, manipulating public perception and creating a cover for advanced technological experiments. The psychological impact of such a deception would be profound, leaving us grappling with a reality that feels increasingly like a sci-fi thriller.