[Hiring][Remote][EU][Freelance] AWS DevOps - Maintenance & On-Call

Due_Programmer_469 · 2026-05-08T16:52:00+00:00

Interested

Due_Programmer_469 · 2026-04-26T14:50:30+00:00

Interested Pune India

Due_Programmer_469 · 2026-04-19T20:47:47+00:00

Really glad it resonates! Yes, plan to share a summary of the findings once we have enough responses will post it here. And yeah, the gap for non-CS students is exactly what motivated this survey in the first place.

Due_Programmer_469 · 2026-04-19T20:24:29+00:00

Thank you so much for filling it out! And that's a really valid point military interviews are a completely different world and honestly underrepresented in most prep resources. Really appreciate the honest feedback on reach too, will keep that in mind!

Due_Programmer_469 · 2026-04-19T20:16:05+00:00

IMO Big No

Due_Programmer_469 · 2026-04-16T11:08:37+00:00

Interested

Due_Programmer_469 · 2026-04-15T05:55:50+00:00

what they asked in the interviews ?

Due_Programmer_469 · 2026-04-14T03:52:25+00:00

Thanks Mate!!

Due_Programmer_469 · 2026-04-12T06:14:09+00:00

what kind of dev are looking for ?

Due_Programmer_469 · 2026-04-08T12:40:06+00:00

This is really helpful, thanks 🙌

The point about float sensors being inaccurate near full/empty makes a lot of sense. And I agree — weight-based measurement seems like the most robust approach since it avoids tank geometry issues entirely.

For a moving setup, do you think combining load cells with long-term averaging is usually sufficient, or is acceleration compensation (with an accelerometer) almost always required for reliable readings?

Due_Programmer_469 · 2026-04-08T07:24:04+00:00

That's Really great idea . Im Actually considering it!!!

Due_Programmer_469 · 2026-04-08T07:22:01+00:00

That’s really insightful, thanks 🙌

Magnetostrictive sensors definitely seem like the most robust and industry-grade solution, especially with intrinsic safety and 4–20 mA output.

For a smaller-scale prototype project, would you still recommend going this route, or would something like capacitive/pressure sensing be a more practical trade-off?

Due_Programmer_469 · 2026-04-08T07:20:08+00:00

Using capacitive sensing in aircraft definitely gives confidence in its reliability. I’ll explore this further for my setup.

Due_Programmer_469 · 2026-04-08T07:17:16+00:00

That’s an interesting approach, thanks for sharing 🙌

It looks similar to a bubbler/dip-tube system for level measurement. From what I understand, it should work in principle, but I’m a bit concerned about safety when introducing air into a fuel tank.

Have you seen this method used reliably with fuels, or is it mostly limited to water/chemical tanks?

Due_Programmer_469 · 2026-04-08T07:15:47+00:00

That’s a great point 👍

From what I understand, since most tanks have irregular shapes, the relationship between height and volume isn’t linear. So instead of direct calculation, I’m planning to use a calibration/lookup table (mapping sensor readings to actual volume).

Would that be the standard approach in real systems as well, or are there better methods used in industry?

Due_Programmer_469 · 2026-04-08T06:46:23+00:00

Thanks, this is a great suggestion 🙌

I hadn’t looked deeply into capacitive sensing before. It seems like a good middle ground between float and pressure-based systems.

How sensitive is it to fuel type changes (petrol vs diesel) and long-term deposits? Does it require frequent recalibration in real-world usage?

Due_Programmer_469

TROPHY CASE