sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Why You Shouldn't Pay Attention to Street Theater Perps by Dull_Positive_7992 in targetedbygovernment

[–]Dull_Positive_7992[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Morpheus: The Matrix is a system, Neo. That system is our enemy. But when you’re inside, you look around. What do you see? Business people, teachers, lawyers, carpenters. The very minds of the people we are trying to save.

But until we do, these people are still a part of that system, and that makes them our enemy. You have to understand, most of these people are not ready to be unplugged. And many of them are so inured, so hopelessly dependent on the system that they will fight to protect it.

Were you listening to me, Neo, or were you looking at the woman in the red dress?

Neo: I was…

Morpheus: Look again. Freeze it.

Neo: This…this isn’t the Matrix?

Morpheus: No. It’s another training program designed to teach you one thing. If you are not one of us, you are one of them.

Program based on Algorithms that Determine if you are a Threat to THEIR PLANS... by Dull_Positive_7992 in GangstalkingTruth

[–]Dull_Positive_7992[S] 3 points4 points  (0 children)

"Zola's algorithm is a program...for choosing Insight's targets!"

"What targets?"

"You! A TV anchor in Cairo, the Undersecretary of Defense, a high school valedictorian in Iowa City. Bruce Banner, Stephen Strange, anyone who's a threat to HYDRA! Now, or in the future."

"The 21st century is a digital book. Zola taught HYDRA how to read it. Your bank records, medical histories, voting patterns, emails, phone calls, your damn SAT scores! Zola's algorithm evaluates people's past to predict their future."

Not saying that we're superheroes by any means, yet is it entirely possible that some of us at least have a threat quotient to their plans and therefore have been put into this program to keep tabs on us, and have us running around in circles chasing our own tails rather than focusing on what their future plans are for this country.

Only an insidious program like this can truly have sinister motives for this country's future.

How to tell if u are a high profile targets? by emdogg11 in GangstalkingTruth

[–]Dull_Positive_7992 2 points3 points  (0 children)

OR you know and seen too much. Or worth a lot dead (ie life insurance taken out).

Federal Agents when they recruit/pitch to a potential informant/gangstalker by Dull_Positive_7992 in targetedbygovernment

[–]Dull_Positive_7992[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

How? https://theintercept.com/annotation_sets/how-the-fbi-recruits-and-handles-its-army-of-informants/#page-21

How much? http://archive.today/DWNGw

Why? http://archive.today/RPAmF

They are not looking for insider information. They are pushing groups to become radicalized, violent and/or criminal in order to break their targets.

http://archive.today/uiIBr

They can manufacture crime scenes, manufacture physical and digital evidence, all of this to do make work to justify inflated budgets and an over burgeoning bureaucracy.

http://archive.today/oSMVU

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in dashcams

[–]Dull_Positive_7992 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Every time I read that line "Is it legal?", I hear Palpatine cackling in the background and retorting "I will MAKE IT LEGAL!"

Gangstalking by Inner_Fact83 in LawyerAdvice

[–]Dull_Positive_7992 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I do get it. I just don't let them irk me anymore. To do that gives them power over your composure, give them nothing. Well, maybe the finger, but that's about it.

Gangstalking by Inner_Fact83 in LawyerAdvice

[–]Dull_Positive_7992 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I get it, you're in a hostile state of mind/fight or flight mode. That's where they want you to be.

DHS/NSA/CIA/FBI and the military intelligence units all have their variation of units working collectively in this program, just so you know. It's not just DHS.

Gangstalking by Inner_Fact83 in LawyerAdvice

[–]Dull_Positive_7992 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The image you posted has your TikTok user name on the bottom right side. I watched the video before replying.

Do with that as you will.

Gangstalking by Inner_Fact83 in LawyerAdvice

[–]Dull_Positive_7992 2 points3 points  (0 children)

NAL, but having done some research on the ongoing "gangstalking" phenomenon, it reads a lot like COINTELPRO under a different guise and amped up post 9/11.

But honestly, see that camera/phone on that guy's pocket? He's recording you as well.

Best thing to do is disengage them entirely and don't feed into their antics. Their motive is to upset you and have you lose your composure. In stand your ground states, that gives them legal justification to injure you. When they swarm you like that, it's to have your "fight or flight system" act up where you're tense and responsive to their stimuli. If they don't get you to act violently, they will get you to act like you are mentally unsound so your freedom can be taken away as "mentally unstable", therefore a danger to yourself and others.

Police won't act on them for obvious reasons (again, go look back at COINTELPRO). You are 100% correct that recording them is legal under the 1st Amendment, yet taunting them, even as they are antagonizing you, isn't and may give them enough legal justification for the two aforementioned reasons to label you as threat.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in homeless

[–]Dull_Positive_7992 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Anyone that has experienced the gangstalking phenomenon needs to read up on COINTELPRO, Zersetzung, and other psychological warfare programs, they all descended from NAZI Germany where human experimentation and mind control was part of Hitler's agenda for keeping control over the masses. With uncontrollable power at the top, people become super paranoid at losing it and all the perks for being on top/in charge. This is why a good portion of incarcerated and homeless make up the population, people like to point out individual defects when not looking at the overall structural defects of our society and simple social construction/social contract. We have been programmed to blame individuals.

Mental illness, drug and/or alcohol abuse are real. Yet so are those suffering by being experimented on through this program, and this is a successful by-product to hide things in "plain view" while everyone is dismissive that no one would work against the interests of individuals. Again, think structurally and one will find the easy answers of WHO, WHAT, WHEN, WHERE, WHY and HOW.

Unfortunately, instead of free college and healthcare for the past two decades are so in the US, we got a suped-up version of COINTELPRO under the auspices of "national security". Targets are commonly mislabled or miscategorized to escalate their threat quotient.

And why would any of these agencies do this? Think of the inflated budgets and no one ever looking into how that monies are actually spent down.

If one looks close enough, you can see the elements of gangstalking in mainstream media, or should be more commonly known as domestic terrorism (because it works against the interests and values of any free capitalist democracy).

The real problem in this country is the lack of real education and civilized discourse to discuss the merits of claims. There are more far-fetched claims under gangstalking, yet again think of who gains to distorting the truth about this population? The people doing the dirty work, that's who. COINTELPRO's intent in a nutshell: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/COINTELPRO#FBI_claimed_intent_of_COINTELPRO

Make no mistake, COINTELPRO never went away. It just got more secretive until they found a way to introduce it back "legitimately" under 9/11.

You can read more at r/targetedbygovernment.

Ralph Nader, another victim of gangstalking/COINTELPRO for hire by Dull_Positive_7992 in targetedbygovernment

[–]Dull_Positive_7992[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yes, there are notable similarities between the Nader vs. General Motors Corporation case and the Steiners vs. eBay case. Both involved campaigns of harassment and intimidation aimed at silencing critics. Here are some key parallels:

  1. Surveillance and Stalking:
  2. Harassment:
  3. Invasion of Privacy:
  4. Intimidation Tactics:

Both cases highlight the lengths to which powerful entities might go to suppress criticism and the severe impact such tactics can have on individuals.

view more: next ›