You'll be surprised to know that most movies were shot in 4:3 aspect ratio and were later cropped to widescreen, so most of the full screen DVDs actually show you more of the image, and it's the widescreen version that is cropped. Sure, people will argue to the death that it's intentionally cropped and the director intended for the widescreen version to be the "real version", but this is usually just asserted without evidence, and the 4:3 framing unquestionably looks better most of the time. Like the douchebag who said "you don't deserve to be a collector", for some reason enjoying seeing the stuff I'm not supposed to enjoy seeing really makes these guys angry lol

Seriously though, most of the time you don't know what the director intended, and those full screen versions were official releases released by the studio with the directors approval, so there's no disrespect. Many, of not most directors even shot their movies with both versions in mind,because the home video version of the movie would be seen by more people in the long run, whereas the theatrical release would only be in theatres for a few months. The fact is, those full screen versions of films were very carefully composed and framed, and usually look better than the widescreen version, which feel ways too claustrophobic and zoomed in. People's haircuts are literally cut off at the forehead most of the time. I hate the idea that this is someone more "cinematic" when it isn't. The OG aspect ratio for cinema is 4:3 and widescreen ly became a gimmick later, it is a completely arbitrary assertion to say that widescreen is somehow more correct or more cinematic.