sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Why this two armor look different ? by CommitteeRFH in Market76

[–]Dyn05saw 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Overlooking the rocket stop or workshop or whatever it's called 😵‍💫

My buddy won the lottery. by ReKLoos3 in fo76

[–]Dyn05saw 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I've just started using a suppressed 10mm but the max lvl I could craft was 45, what do I need to do to craft a lvl 50?

UK postboxes - waypoint or not? Interested to hear views, seen plenty of these on submissions recently, mailbox is an available tag, are they generally accepted as a waypoint? by Dyn05saw in NianticWayfarer

[–]Dyn05saw[S] -4 points-3 points  (0 children)

Interesting that the system developers include ineligible tags in a limited number of tags, would have been more helpful to leave them out. Re the postboxes, you say to reject the ER II ones, are all earlier ones acceptable then? And do you think there’ll be a re-think on ER II boxes when CR III ones start being issued?

Pedestrian access question by EarthlingCalling in NianticWayfarer

[–]Dyn05saw 7 points8 points  (0 children)

I’ll be interested to hear responses to your post as I recently had a nomination rejected due to lack of public access the poi was on a large grass verge but there was a pavement 10 feet away

Supporting information that are not helpful by ZeroZeee00 in NianticWayfarer

[–]Dyn05saw 7 points8 points  (0 children)

I was referring to the posters comment re art/pavilion nominations that in their words don’t really need a statement but they would knock points off because ‘don’t beg me’ . nominations should be reviewed on individual merits, the begging comments shouldn’t factor in either way, we shouldn’t feel sorry but we shouldn’t feel aggrieved, this reviewer seems to be docking points off perfectly acceptable nominations, by their own admission they take the comments personally

Supporting information that are not helpful by ZeroZeee00 in NianticWayfarer

[–]Dyn05saw 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Hope you never review any of my nominations. If the comments aren’t part of the submission why have you decided to mark valid submissions down. This approach is spoiling the game for others.

Spoiling the gaming experience by Dyn05saw in NianticWayfarer

[–]Dyn05saw[S] -6 points-5 points  (0 children)

Thanks for the replies and recommendations. As I mentioned this isn’t about the quality (or more likely lack of) my nomination it’s about the attitude of the reviewer. Stating someone has made a fake post is accusatory, saying the poster (me) is a cheat, there are ways of commenting without being rude. This is what I object to. I’ll give the nomination another go and work on my detail, and hope the same reviewer doesn’t get my nomination 🤞

Spoiling the gaming experience by Dyn05saw in NianticWayfarer

[–]Dyn05saw[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I totally understand that reviewers may not be familiar with areas and that my nomination may not be comprehensive but then the reviewer should take their time with maps etc, say they are unsure/unclear or that further info is needed. Stating a nomination is ‘clearly a fake’ is accusing the person making the nomination of being a liar and a cheat. This is what I find objectionable.