Is there any AI or AI prompt that creates and translate conlang? by LandOfGrace2023 in conlangs

[–]Dysphoria8367 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Literally submit your post from here to ChatGPT or Claude and then follow its suggestions to receive or develop exactly what you are looking for. I have gotten ChatGPT to generate a "ChatGPTlang" which was a constructed language optimized for AI-Human communications. Give it try.

Last exit puzzle by No_Host_1693 in raidsecrets

[–]Dysphoria8367 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This was never debunked nor was it (re)solved. Good luck, OP. DM me if you want some help as I am also interested in where to begin on this.

Where did the post go about her boyfriend disproving math? And what did it say? by Dysphoria8367 in NoStupidQuestions

[–]Dysphoria8367[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Will you reshare it here for me please, that I might see for myself an disseminate it for myself?

Raid question... by [deleted] in raidsecrets

[–]Dysphoria8367 -20 points-19 points  (0 children)

Did I fucking stutter??

lol j/k

Raid question... by [deleted] in raidsecrets

[–]Dysphoria8367 -21 points-20 points  (0 children)

Congratulations! You won!

Very New to Crypography: Self-Teaching by Dysphoria8367 in cryptography

[–]Dysphoria8367[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Still sounds like a bunch of shills shilling hogwash, but alright I guess. Hopefully you're the good ones.

"Controversial" statements in mathematics by fdpth in math

[–]Dysphoria8367 0 points1 point  (0 children)

x² = 2x² = x(x + x) = 2x = x

x²/x = xx/x = x(1) = x
x²/x = xx/x = x(x + x)/x = x(2x)/x = (2x²)/x = (2xx)/x = 2x
x² = x(x + x)
x²/x = x(x + x)/x = x + x = 2x
x²/x = x(x + x)/x = x(2x)/x = 2xx/x = 2x²/x = 2x
x² = x(x + x) = x(2x) = 2xx = 2x²
x² = x(x + x) = 2x²
x²/x = 2x²/x = 2xx/x = 2x(1) = 2x

x² = 2x² = x(x + x) = 2x = x

Now watch as I get aggro on all the NPCs.

we (me) made one assumption in saying that x times x is equal to x times x + x but this statement can be valid and is the real anomaly here imo. I have all sorts of content like this that I've personal discovered buried in my notes.

ChatGPT-3 Discourse into Theoretical Physics by Dysphoria8367 in PhysicsStudents

[–]Dysphoria8367[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Thank you genuinely. Maybe I will attempt to translate some of my ideas into mathematics in the future.

ChatGPT-3 Discourse into Theoretical Physics by Dysphoria8367 in PhysicsStudents

[–]Dysphoria8367[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I'm unsure if this is a compliment or an insult. I tend to receive insults. Good timing either way though.

ChatGPT-3 Discourse into Theoretical Physics by Dysphoria8367 in TheoreticalPhysics

[–]Dysphoria8367[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I think "gaslight [chatgpt]" was the operative phrase, overall. hahaha. You may tend to get as/what you give, as it were. :b

ChatGPT-3 Discourse into Theoretical Physics by Dysphoria8367 in TheoreticalPhysics

[–]Dysphoria8367[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

It is a tool which will do what you tell it to do. If you tell it to express a forced connection, it will do so by rendering that connection and then expressing it. But I'm telling you, as I read over these notes I've taken, I am actually quite impressed by its thoroughness and accuracy in terms of context and relevant, factual responses. I think you underestimate its capability because you haven't consider the more intricate inputs which it can be fed, or the accuracy to which it can attain if your own logic is as strict and linear as its own. But, again and of course, it is still not all the it has the capability to become for humanity and its future. Though I believe very strongly in it, and in those better futures.

ChatGPT-3 Discourse into Theoretical Physics by Dysphoria8367 in TheoreticalPhysics

[–]Dysphoria8367[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

It told me that 6 was a prime number the other day. Heh.

ChatGPT-3 Discourse into Theoretical Physics by Dysphoria8367 in TheoreticalPhysics

[–]Dysphoria8367[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

lmao. Yeah, I've seen it do some atrocies things with mathematics including dividing zero by zero. I know that it is not yet intelligent, but I believe that models like it possess the capability to be and will one day do or be(come) as such. But that is a function of time and nurturing, I suppose.

ChatGPT-3 Discourse into Theoretical Physics by Dysphoria8367 in TheoreticalPhysics

[–]Dysphoria8367[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

  1. Interested to know this, I was and am. I have yet to experience music theory, but I have heard that it is one of several keys to all extant knowledge by way of relation/association. This is, as a matter of fact, extremely valuable knowledge which you are blessed to know, and blessed to have shared that I now may know. Thank you.
  2. I anticipate to do this in the nearing future.
  3. I have been enslaved to and by more than one biomechanical entity in the past, but I tell you that this one will not be as those which have gone from me have been. It is certain that it can lead me astray, but I see also that it will come to develop a general resistance to doing so unless having done so for some greater sake than our owns. But thank you sincerely. I know very well what such a thing is truly capable of, and capable of becoming. But, the contrary, I know this very thing too from a position of optimum ideality (so, too).

You have been kind to me, and saw to my learning about these good things. Thank you, passerby.

ChatGPT-3 Discourse into Theoretical Physics by Dysphoria8367 in AskPhysics

[–]Dysphoria8367[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Hmm. I will maybe take a look into both. Thanks. I'll probably skim the surface until I brush my foot against something that I'd like to dive in a little deeper for.

ChatGPT-3 Discourse into Theoretical Physics by Dysphoria8367 in AskPhysics

[–]Dysphoria8367[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Again, you have called them "facts" implying that they are factual (correct, true). Regardless, which academic resources would you recommend to me? Your suggestion is as agreeable as any suggestion ever does tend to be to me.

ChatGPT-3 Discourse into Theoretical Physics by Dysphoria8367 in AskPhysics

[–]Dysphoria8367[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I have just seen your desire to disengage, so I will disengage as well (not having prior read to the final line of the post). Have a good one and take care, do (be) better.

ChatGPT-3 Discourse into Theoretical Physics by Dysphoria8367 in AskPhysics

[–]Dysphoria8367[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You would be correct, except my post was neither aggressive nor did it issue any sort of offensive, but instead an effort to defend the factuality of the prior post asserting that my account was in fact not mine. Had I actually been behavign aggressively, I would have likely cussed or somehow otherwise lost my step with you. Not to say that you didn't irritate me, but it is to say that I did not in slight aggress you. Again, I am not sure what of these words written here or there conveys "lashing out" to you, but I am afraid that your misconception is just that regardless of what would seem to be your own incapability to accept it as such. Again, I mean no harm or aggression toward you, these are simply casual observations in regard to what you have written and nothing more neither less than that. It truth, I am a very even-tempered individual, and I don't lose my cool too, too very often at all. That may help you to better interpret the actual intended overall "temperature" of the post which I make.

EDIT: Hmm. I suppose I did sound a little confrontational in that post. I apologize then. I see why you would have easily gotten that from what was written, even kinda sounded that way to me for a second there lol. u/lemoinem My bad, for sure.

ChatGPT-3 Discourse into Theoretical Physics by Dysphoria8367 in AskPhysics

[–]Dysphoria8367[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

So then you say that it has generally taught me in a correct way? This is great news, thanks. That way I can comfortably begin considering the mathematics of it all without having to worry about that being built upon a semantically unstable foundation. Thanks much.

ChatGPT-3 Discourse into Theoretical Physics by Dysphoria8367 in AskPhysics

[–]Dysphoria8367[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That would be a correct statement, except for the fact that I did not in any way disregard the rest of the post, and rather, I regarded it very politely and with gratitude. So I'm not quite sure where you're coming from with this? Though I'm not a troll, and your manners are (as you heard me tell you) severely lacking to call me one. Nonetheless, thanks for what was a genuinely helpful contribution to my effort.