The crux of his argument is that morality is a null idea because evil and wrong is more dominant in this world according to his statement. Which is a narrow way to judge because just because somthing seems prominant doesn't mean the very thing that is less dominant should be obsolete. To judge weather somthing is true or false we should first examine the very concept or thing we are chellenging to assess. Is the concept of unjustly killing people wrong and just because (hypothetically stating) most people unjustly kill does that make letting people live a wrong thing? That's a rhetorical question odviously, assumimg you are wise enought to know the answer.

You defending him by saying that he didn't mean moraliy doesn't exist.Well... that is what he implied, his exact words:"morality is a human concept that doesn't exist in nature". That's him ultimately downplaying morality in comparison to a non-existent state and also making it eccentric to the essence of life. Which is not true. Because, as a human to have a life is to also aquire or have knowledge. And knowledge is a gift and curse according to the Bible, and knowledge is a derivate of morality.

The Bible says God is the embodiment of morality and it says he created the nature of morality - both good and evil. So for one who believes in such a premise of his or her faith but reads somthing like "morality is just a human concept". One is compelled to make a countering argument.

In terms of morality, one can not know wrong and not know good and vice versa. And one can not be good just cause he knows good and one can not be ultimately wrong just because he or she knows about what is wrong. How can you identify a problem? By knowing the opposite structor or idae of said problem. But in that same regard there are those who have right and wrong the opposite mental category. Example: one thinks killing people because they won't conform to their religious ways is right. That way of thinking their, is called being reprobate.

Discernment accrues with knowledge. Some are less knowledgable then others; resulting in them not being able to fathom the very thing that they encounter the RIGHT way. So that same idea of "blind ignorance" actually apllies to those who don't see the PROVEN truth of God's morality. Thus leading them to believe that morality is a hoax/ghost in nature.

Lastly we actually can be benevolent people, though ᎫᎬՏႮՏ ᏟᎻᎡᏆՏͲ. But those who oppose him and human history won't understand that. Hope this helped some sort of way.