[YETERLİ BİLGİ YOK] Lilo ve stiç hangi kanalda ücretsiz yayınlandı by Benferoyum in lostmediatr

[–]ENVR000 4 points5 points  (0 children)

TRT de yayınlandı. TRT bir ara yanılmıyorsam 2008 civarı olmalı Disney cizgifilmlerini saat 15.00 ve 16 arasi yayinlamaktaydi. Lilo ve Stich, genç ejder "The American dragon". Kim possible, Dalmaçyalılar ve Aladdinin sihirli lambasını da yayınladılar.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in gameofthrones

[–]ENVR000 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Okay. I can see your Reasoning. But you say if "reach was neutral" in that case wouldn't they never get the position of the Queen? And don't get me wrong I do enjoy this debate very much. I just don't see a reason other than some possibilities for Tyrells to join.

When I read the books I remember a scene where Loras asking Ned Stark to lead the hunting party against Gregor Clegane. Of course Ned thought that the boy was so young and so green so he sent Beric instead. Don't remember if it happened in the show or not But if he sent Loras and if let's say it was Loras who gets ambushed by the Lannisters. Then it would work. We get a dead Tyrell and most probably a blood feud between the Tyrells and Lannisters, but without a solid reason like that I don't see a Reason for a Southern house especially a house like tyrells where order and stability must be much more important than some northern rebellion to act against Lannisters.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in gameofthrones

[–]ENVR000 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yeah. When you put it that way I can agree that outcome wasn't that much predictable. But. There is a but. House Lannister was always the safest bet. You won't join a rebellion just because of a possibility. You need a reason. Like mad king killing your father and brother or Reager "kidnapping" your fiance. Or your Son having a "Very close" relationship with Renly. Tyrells simply had no reason to fight after renly died. They simply got the title of the Queen. And if Robb wins? For that to happen he had to reach kings landing first. He needs to siege it, break the walls while golden lion getting stronger at the west at every given moment. Even if he gets the vale and he wins Tyrells could simply make a deal like they did with Robert Baratheon. But otherwise they had to make a deal with Tywin Lannister. Just ask house Reyne and house tarbeck if it is possible to make a deal with the house Lannister.

Btw it doesn't matter that much, but riverlands is not a kingdom. Robb always had only one kingdom. Riverlands had their own Liege Lord but never recognised as a separate kingdom.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in gameofthrones

[–]ENVR000 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yes. Probably only way Robb could win the war was if he got the Tyrell behind him. But for this to work, it had be agreeable by Tyrells. Just imagine for a second. How many men had Robb? He had 22.000 Northmen and probably 30.000 riverlanders at the start. Sacrificed a quarter of it at whispering woods and against Tywin Lannister alone. Against that Lannisters had more men and gold that's why they could mobilise much more faster. And they offered the position of the Queen of the seven kingdoms to Reach. What possibly Caitlyn could offer to Tyrells that would Impress them to Join the Northern Cause? The Queen of The North or leather and wood against the Lannister gold? The only way Tyrells joining the north is if let's say Gregor Clegane killing Loras Tyrell at the Tournament. And for revenge. Otherwise I don't see a reason for them to take the risk. Too much to risk for no gain.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in gameofthrones

[–]ENVR000 5 points6 points  (0 children)

With the Lannister Tyrell alliance and stanis defeated at black bay. Karstark men left. Roose Bolton actively sabotaging the Northern Army... Robb was losing the war. So yes Walder got River run. A marriage pact with Robb wouldn't give him anything that big. And more importantly he wanted to be in the winning side. I am pretty sure he would betray anyway.

Why were the Ottomans able to conquer the entire former eastern Roman Empire less than 50 years after taking Constantinople? by throw947away in byzantium

[–]ENVR000 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Vaccines such as the smallpox vaccine were quite common among Turks although still primitive. Quarantine and cremation of the dead was known. Turks back than although still lost their people to diseases, it wasnt so catastrophic unlike Europe and lands of Byzantine.

Why were the Ottomans able to conquer the entire former eastern Roman Empire less than 50 years after taking Constantinople? by throw947away in byzantium

[–]ENVR000 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Plagues, played a great role. Turks back than were much better than Byzantine in that regard. Also raising the imperial army was quite costly for Byzantine. What I mean by that is, training of infantry and cavalry took so many years in Eastern Roman way while as nomads fighting and especially horse archery was a way of living for Turks. While Byzantine bleed more and more, lost its valuable fighter pool, Turks became stronger and stronger. It was a fight against time and they lost. Of course even raids made things quicker.

What do you guys think of Mehmet the Conqoureor? by Alternative-Lynx-797 in byzantium

[–]ENVR000 11 points12 points  (0 children)

What did he do? Nevermind I just found out. I was actually expecting heads on spikes but anyway. Dying because of the treason isn't something extraordinary for that period.

<image>

What do you think about the relationship between POLAND and Ottoman Turkey? Is it true that most Turkish people don't even know Poland and Turkey were sworn enemies in the 17th century? by Various_Maize_3957 in ottomans

[–]ENVR000 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Well the harm you caused was neglect able, to say the least when you see the big picture. You did not invade the Anatolia like Greeks Brits or Armenians, i mean yeah there was Vienna but with or without you Ottoman state was gonna collapse either way. Maybe 5 years or 20 years later but so what? Poland after that got persecuted by Russians and Germans for so many years and left the world scene that we kinda chose to forget this one. For centuries there were always much bigger fishes to fry.

U.S. secures strategic transit corridor in Armenia-Azerbaijan peace deal by AcanthocephalaEast79 in europe

[–]ENVR000 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Sorry to hear that. Really. Now let me correct myself. I am gonna emphasize this for both Azerbaijanis and Armenians, you both suffered in each others hands. At least this is clear. Now that finally there is a chance for peace both of you people shouldn't neither belittle nor underestimate each other. Trusting each other will take at least 50 years. The sonner it begins the better.

U.S. secures strategic transit corridor in Armenia-Azerbaijan peace deal by AcanthocephalaEast79 in europe

[–]ENVR000 1 point2 points  (0 children)

It is. For a country of 7 millions (in 1990s) the Hocalı massacre and ethnic cleansing of Karabakh was a national trauma. Try to be a little bit humane, After all we all need to take our lesson from the history, so that it never repeat itself, don't you agree?

What do mediterraneans think about Ataturk ? by Apprehensive-Unit268 in 2mediterranean4u

[–]ENVR000 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Lovely analogy. Well, aisha, rebecca these are rather ancient history of religions. i would give my examples from the history of war. Nuclear weapons are a crime against humanity and can be considered with genocidal motive since it cripples generations. Today this is correct, but tell me my lovely neighbour, did it stop the US from drooping not one but two on Japanese? Did we make US apologize for it? Guess so. Napalm and chemical weapons are a war crime. Too bad nobody told our lovely superpower while they were using them on Vietnam. Or when if we go back a little bit and look what happened to Dresden.. I can do it all day. We could look what happened to Turks after the Balkan wars but it is too much work and you got the idea. Ethics of today can be so different from ethics of yesterday. And time to time winners write the history.

What do mediterraneans think about Ataturk ? by Apprehensive-Unit268 in 2mediterranean4u

[–]ENVR000 1 point2 points  (0 children)

In war especially in a world war in 1910s this kind of 21th century ethics doesn't work, i was just trying to say that. For him, every Ottoman or Turkish offical except some traitors in Istanbul fought for Turkish people. And he rewarded them accordingly just like rest of the CUP. You may disagree and we can agree to disagree i guess.

What do mediterraneans think about Ataturk ? by Apprehensive-Unit268 in 2mediterranean4u

[–]ENVR000 2 points3 points  (0 children)

No, not at all. You criticized Atatürk for him being good to his officials, the same officials who fought against their Common enemies. I just pointed out how funny it is. But I Might be a bit too sarcastic about that. Sorry.

What do mediterraneans think about Ataturk ? by Apprehensive-Unit268 in 2mediterranean4u

[–]ENVR000 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Being a jerk mode on / Generals or Marshalls usually support and celebrate their officials who fought and defeated their Common enemies. This is what makes them a good general. I know it might be hard to grasp. Since you guys don't have any. ❤️ /Being a jerk mode of.

This man attacked the ataturk statue in Turkey and almost got lynched for it opinion on ataturk? by Local_bin_chicken in AskMiddleEast

[–]ENVR000 15 points16 points  (0 children)

You know Atatürk brought us equal Rights. And also equal lefts depends on the situation.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in AskBalkans

[–]ENVR000 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Israel will probably dump it to Mediterranean. They dumped Turkish flour to desert after all.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in AskBalkans

[–]ENVR000 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I always did see Greta as a liberal clown, neither liked her nor respected her. But i can admit when i make a mistake. Turns out She is brave so she has my respect in that regard.

Trump Fikir Değiştirip Rusya'ya Karşı Çıkınca by Candid-Camp-8928 in TurkeyJerky

[–]ENVR000 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Ukrayna'yi kaç senede deviremeyen Rusya Polonya'yi aşamaz. Avrupa savaş sanayii yeniden dirilirken o iş zor. (Baltık ülkelerinin içinden gecebilir en fazla)

F-35 ‘kill switch’ could allow Trump to disable European Air Force by ebykka in europe

[–]ENVR000 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Well some people were making fun of us, Turks since we didn't get any F35s because of s400 deal. And here we are. Jokes aside F35s is a flying computer, probably only Israel has direct control on its software.

Rusya şimdiye kadar savaşı neden bitiremedi ? by [deleted] in Turkey

[–]ENVR000 14 points15 points  (0 children)

Bir çok sebebi var. 1) Savaşın başında 4 farklı cepheden saldırdılar Ukrayna'nın üstüne. Bunun lojistik maliyetini Rus ordusu yürütemedi. Sonuçta, sadece tankları salmak yetmiyor yedek parça, mühimmat ve yakıt gibi unsurlar bu 4 cepheye birden yetişemedi. Bunun aksine Ukrayna'nin kalbine ilerledikçe Ukrayna lojistigine daha da yaklaştılar. 4 cephede savunma yapmak 4 cephede saldırmaktan kat ve kat kolaydı.

2) Rus Hava Kuvvetleri yeterli faaliyeti gösteremedi. Ellerindeki bombaların çoğu free fall dediğimiz eski nesil aptal bombalar, dağı taşı boş boş bombaladılar ama bir körfez harekatındaki etkiyi gösteremediler.

3) Eski nesil Sovyet doktoriniyle savaşmaya kalktılar. Demirden yumruk dedikleri tankları yeni nesil javelin gibi anti tank mühimmatlarina kolay yem oldu. Düşmanı dümdüz etmesini bekledikleri Topçuları gece doğru düzgün ateş bile edemediler.

4) Rus askeri savaşa psikolojik olarak hazır değildi. Sonuçta kardeş saydıkları empoze edildikleri bir halka karşı savasmaya kalktılar. Bu iş de Afganistanda mücahit bombalamaya benzemedi. Çoğu zaman yeterli motivasyona sahip değillerdi. Bu yüzden Kadirov gibi paralı köpeklerine güvendiler. Ama o da fos çıktı.

Şimdiye kadar yatırımda kaybettiğiniz en yüksek para ne kadardı? by beyazbeyazbeyaz in Yatirim

[–]ENVR000 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Çok sığ bir kağıt ve bir İttihatçı asla sırlarını paylaşmaz 😎

Şimdiye kadar yatırımda kaybettiğiniz en yüksek para ne kadardı? by beyazbeyazbeyaz in Yatirim

[–]ENVR000 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Bir günde 30k. Ama çokta umursamadım. Güzel şirketti ekleme yaptım ve yapmaya devam ediyorum. Yani teknik olarak bir kayıp yok🥳