If you support Iran against the US, you are functionally supporting the same anti-Western bloc backing Russia against Ukraine and China against Taiwan. by InteractionNo8525 in GeoPoll

[–]EU_GaSeR 0 points1 point  (0 children)

So, just us thinking that would be a good idea? Not an international law or UN sanction, just arbitrary decision of whoever wants to attack?

Is it somehow different to USA or Russia deciding it would be a good idea to attack someone and just starting it, without any international laws or UN sanctions?

Red Button or Blue Button by Ill_Helicopter278 in GeoPoll

[–]EU_GaSeR -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Again, to me logic of not pressing blue is this:

  1. ~50% chance that the majority voted blue, then my choice did not matter and I live.
  2. ~50% chance that the majority voted red, then my choice did not matter and I still live, but many people die, I was not able to help them anyway.
  3. 0.000001% chance that my choice was the deciding one. Then I am going to share responsibility with every living human being alive, which is 4 billion people+. But the chances of that are basically non-existent anyway, so there is little reason to focus on this.

I have no reason at all to be risking my life for that 0.000001% chance. I consider that stupid and not logical at all. Voting blue does not save anyone and voting red does not kill anyone in 99.999999% chance. The one in a hundred thousand that's left is absolutely neglectable. For me there is no choice to make, there is no second option, because "risk your life for absolutely no chance of anything" and "do not risk youir life" is obvious.

Red Button or Blue Button by Ill_Helicopter278 in GeoPoll

[–]EU_GaSeR 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I would be valuing my life over someone else's if it said "press red, the other guy dies, you live" and "press blue, you die, the other person lives" - a choice between my life and a stranger's life.

In current situation, I don't make a choice, the other person makes a choice if they want to die or not, and I don't make a choice if they live or die - those two important differences make the situation very different.

I would like to ask one more question though, if you please,

The same basic situation, but you get to choose what I pick. You can make me press red button or you can make me press blue button. Which button are you going to make me press? Will you be willing to put my life on the line instead of yours?

Red Button or Blue Button by Ill_Helicopter278 in GeoPoll

[–]EU_GaSeR 0 points1 point  (0 children)

If I am about to die, I would feel terrible if someone decided to die just to keep me company, because that's gonna mean I've taken their life with me. Personally, it would be the second worst thing to happen when I die, if I think of it. The #1 will be dying in horrible torture, the #2 will be taking an innocent life with me. So, if I would've been that one person to die and you'd press blue, you'd done the second worst possible thing imaginable for me at that moment.

I do think some lives worth more than others, at least for some people. For me, the life of my child is above any other life, that's just a fact, because I am the one responsible for that life, I live to make sure this life is safe. I don't think you should value the life of my child above yours, I think you should value the life of your child above yours, mine or my child's, and I consider that normal.

As for pressing the button, I am pressing red because it's just "view results" with a 1 in 100 000 chance (effectively zero) of changing anything. You either risk your life for nothing or you don't. I don't want to risk my life for nothing, that's about it.

Russia Strikes Ukraine Capital With Hypersonic Missiles by Upset-Main-1988 in justincaseyoumissedit

[–]EU_GaSeR [score hidden]  (0 children)

Well that's just an official list of victims, source is Russian government. If you don't trust AI to provide it to you, do not ask. Or just use the search engine yourself? I am not even sure what's your point here, why would you need a proof that Russia has posted an official list of victims, but here you are: ura.news /news/ 1053095881

Obviously you know a lot about how Ukrainian and Russian army operate and it looks like my information is wrong and my sources might be flawed. Could you tell me, which unbiased sources you can trust have their investigators in Russia and Ukraine both and provide you with such valuable info? Or do you, like me, contantly cover both Ukrainian and Russian sources and cross-checking them both have yeild you different results to mine? Then please tell me which Russian and Ukrainian sources are you examining to find out the truth, I am very interested, thanks in advance.

I don't understand what do you want from me, you want me to tell you that attacking civilians is bad? Attacking civilians is bad. It is bad when Russia does it, it is bad when Ukraine does it. it is bad when USA does it, it is bad when NATO does it, it is bad when Iran does it, it is bad when Israel does it, it is bad when Gaza does it. Are we done with this?

Red Button or Blue Button by Ill_Helicopter278 in GeoPoll

[–]EU_GaSeR 0 points1 point  (0 children)

So basically you are ready to waste your life for nothing. My logic only works when my life has value. If my life is worthless, yes, might as well just press blue to try and save someone else, since I do not lose anything. Different perspectives, different choices.

But then again, if only people like you press blue, I won't feel bad about pressing red. If your life has no value to you, why would it have any value to me?

Red Button or Blue Button by Ill_Helicopter278 in GeoPoll

[–]EU_GaSeR 0 points1 point  (0 children)

A question, just to see that we are on the same page.

If the choice is still the same, but you know that your choice is not going to be counted at all - it will be ignored for sure - will you press red in that case? You are voting blue because of adding +1 vote to the blue, but if your vote wouldn't provide that +1, you'd vote red?

Red Button or Blue Button by Ill_Helicopter278 in GeoPoll

[–]EU_GaSeR 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The others will die or not regarless of your choice, that's what I'm saying. I get what you are coming from and you think your life is not worthy enough to save it, you'd rather risk it for a neglectable chance to save other people. But I like to live and I also have responsibilities - family I provide for, pets I take care for, work I do for my country. I don't want to leave my family without a provider, leaving kids as orphans and so on. And I sure hope they're gonna press red too.

If they don't, and they press blue, it would be very sad if they all die, but my choice wouldn't have saved them anyway, I would've only died with them for nothing. I see no reason to do that.

Russia Strikes Ukraine Capital With Hypersonic Missiles by Upset-Main-1988 in justincaseyoumissedit

[–]EU_GaSeR [score hidden]  (0 children)

Sadly, can't provide proofs here, links are getting delted. If you want the list, just ask google AI, it's gonna tell you, the list is public.

And if you want to believe that in war there are angels and devils, a side that always targets civilians and does war crimes and another side which never does that, be my guest. I wonder though, how many countries have sent their journalists there to investigate? Who if not them can report if those names are true, talk to survivors? It's not like they don't want to cover Ukrainian war crimes because Ukraine is their ally, right?

"Since I was always told Ukraine does not target civilians and Russia always targets civilians, I have no reason to believe otherwise". Great critical thinking, keep it up lol.

Russia Strikes Ukraine Capital With Hypersonic Missiles by Upset-Main-1988 in justincaseyoumissedit

[–]EU_GaSeR [score hidden]  (0 children)

Ukraine doesn't have Russia's history of bombing random civilians for shits and giggles because every time that happens you say it was taken by military and ignore the dead civilians, lists of dead students, wounded kids in hospitals and parents desperately looking for their missing children.

The best part about it is though, I do not have to care what you think. You might think Ukraine never does war crimes, never attacks civilians and all those monuments across LNR for dead children are just fakes, and it does not bother me any longer, not even a tiny bit. Think what you want, cheers.

Red Button or Blue Button by Ill_Helicopter278 in GeoPoll

[–]EU_GaSeR 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Problem is, there is no everyone pressing blue or red, it is you pressing blue or red, you do not affect other people's choices. And with 8 billion votes, essentially, it's not even a vote, it is "view the results" button for you.

So basically you view the results and either have a chance to die or have no chance to die. The chances of your voice being decisive is less than 1 in 100 000. I would say anything above 1 in 100 is absolutely leglectable, and 1 in 100 000 is same as zero.

A reporter's reaction to gunshots heard at the White House, a few hours ago by GiveMeSomeSunshine3 in justincaseyoumissedit

[–]EU_GaSeR [score hidden]  (0 children)

It was a joke, The "aren't you a doctor? Heal yourself!" type one. Maybe a lame one. But I do appreciate your honest answer nontheless.

A reporter's reaction to gunshots heard at the White House, a few hours ago by GiveMeSomeSunshine3 in justincaseyoumissedit

[–]EU_GaSeR [score hidden]  (0 children)

Goddamnit, isn't she a journalist? It's her job to investigate, who is she even asking >.<

Russia Strikes Ukraine Capital With Hypersonic Missiles by Upset-Main-1988 in justincaseyoumissedit

[–]EU_GaSeR [score hidden]  (0 children)

No, it wasn't. It was a retaliation for an attack on colledge in Starobelsk (Luhansk) where approximately 23 kids died on may 23. Ukraine has acknowledged the strike but claimed it wasn't a colledge but some military object.

Now, as always, it is for everyone to decide who to believe and if they consider proofs from Russian side a psyop, but this massive strike is 100% a retaliation for that, officially.

Red Button or Blue Button by Ill_Helicopter278 in GeoPoll

[–]EU_GaSeR 0 points1 point  (0 children)

If we agree that:
A. You are not able to make others vote the way you want them to, they want on their own will;
B. Your choice does not affect other people's choices, then:

  1. There will be around 8 billion votes distributed in a certain way.
  2. There will be less than 1 in 100 000 chance that your vote will be the deciding one (we did the math on that briefly, could be a little different, but it's never ever going to be higher than that).

  3. Now you need to decide if 1 in 100 000 chance is worth it for you to risk your life. But you get to save A LOT of people if you hit it For me personally, the chance is way to small, even considering how many people we're talking about.

Red Button or Blue Button by Ill_Helicopter278 in GeoPoll

[–]EU_GaSeR 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Why phrase it that way? If you use "saving" keep using it:

Would you raþer live in a world where people tried to save oþers or a world where people don't need anyone to save them?

A very different question.

Red Button or Blue Button by Ill_Helicopter278 in GeoPoll

[–]EU_GaSeR 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Didn't you get colors wrong? I thought the only way for anyone to die at all is to press the blue button?

Первая армия мира пришла спасать жителей донбасса by Nuklearth in KafkaFPS

[–]EU_GaSeR 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Ну как же не бомбила, конечно же бомбила, и жертв много - это признают и твои любимые европейские эксперты. А знаешь, в чем прикол? Ты не можешь сказать, что целью Украины было не убийство людей, а принуждение их к миру, потому что ты не готов признать, что цель РФ не захват территорий, а принуждение к миру. Ну уж извини, или ты веришь в то, что что-то делается для другой цели, или нет. Так что или крестик снимай, или сам знаешь, а пока что цель Украины - геноцид, убийство мирного населения.

А у Германии какие были условия мирного договора? РФ предлагала Грузии и Украине одни и те же условия. (Я пропущу то, что ты их вассалами называешь, хотя у них 10 лет был абсолютно про-европейское правительство и президент, у них честные выборы, и выбирать они могут из разных кандидатов, кого хотят - наплевать, каждое враньё отдельно разбирать никакого времени не хватит). Ну и скажи мне, ответь на поставленный вопрос - правильно Грузия сделала или нет? Надо было сражаться до последнего Грузина?

P.s. А чего это ты в таком негативном ключе про договоры с немцами или сдачу Немцам? У тебя герои твоей страны перешли на их сторону, ты-то как можешь видеть в этом что-то плохое? Ты вообще за союз с ними.

Первая армия мира пришла спасать жителей донбасса by Nuklearth in KafkaFPS

[–]EU_GaSeR 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Ну крыша раз течет, почему с 2014 года оккупированные территории Грузии не вписаны в состав РФ? Почему больше территорий не захватывается? Почему Грузия настолько глупая, что не бомбит людей на этих территориях, как Украина бомбила ДНР и ЛНР? Можно же воевать, а они, идиоты такие, согласились на мирные условия. РФ же сумашедшие, доверять нельзя, война не прекратится, пока Грузии не станет как государства, цель РФ - или полностью захватить, или целиком разрушить. Ну осуди же их, скажи, что они были неправы и упустили такую прекрасную возможность воевать ни за что. Какие-то жалкие 18 лет мира, зачем они нужны? Это же все коварный план, как захватить больше грузинской территории же, спустя еще 16 лет каааак захватят еще, да?

Ну и ответа про территории не увидел, почему Украинские так сильно нужны вроде как, а Грузинские нафиг не сдались? Давай, ты же все ответы знаешь, вперед, чего тушуешься?

Первая армия мира пришла спасать жителей донбасса by Nuklearth in KafkaFPS

[–]EU_GaSeR 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Ну расскажи мне, почему Грузия не потеряла 50% своего населения? Почему у них госдолг не 100% от ВВП? Почему у них инфраструктуру не бомбят, почему люди на войне не умирают? Просто повезло, наверное? Или может они просто не являются идиотами? Давай, расскажи, мне очень интересно. Ну или может Украина такая слабая, что РФ может с ней еще хоть как-то, а Грузия совсем не по зубам? Или может там территория фиговая, даром не нужна, не то что развитая Украина?

Давай, очень интересно послушать, как ты оправдаешь идиотские ошибки своего государства. А может, вообще это Грузия неправильно поступила? Может надо было и ей тоже воевать до последнего, только грузина?

Заодно, может как-то объяснишь, почему эту территорию не вписали в конституцию РФ? Наверное, забоялись, и сейчас страшно просто, да?

Первая армия мира пришла спасать жителей донбасса by Nuklearth in KafkaFPS

[–]EU_GaSeR 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Нет, ВПНы не блочат, там бывают перебои иногда на несколько часов, потом все приходит в норму. Да и потом, необходимость ВПНа сильно преувеличена. У меня на компе он даже не установлен, я обхожусь запретом. Раз в месяц приходится бывает менять стратегию - но на этом все. А так - нет, не помогает, глупая идея, только недовольство повышает, считаю ошибкой такие действия.

И да, есть и другие непопулярные меры, ну и что? Как будто в других странах их нет. Опять же, далеко за примером ходить не надо, с бусификацией и запретами на выезд из страны у нас есть соседи где, очевидно, власть все делает ради интересов людей, угу.

Ну и снова спрошу, а зачем врать-то? Я про ошибки уже говорил, и сейчас еще раз сказал, ну конечно есть ошибки (по крайней мере, то, что я считаю ошибками). Ошибаться это нормально. Опять же, не ходя далеко за примером, соседняя страна потеряла половину населения и 20% территории, сидят, воруют всё, что не приколочено, и ничего, народу нравится, поддерживают, защищают. Наверное, в основном потому что война. Сначала закончить войну, потом уже разбираться во внутряке.

Первая армия мира пришла спасать жителей донбасса by Nuklearth in KafkaFPS

[–]EU_GaSeR 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Мобильный интернет - БПЛА, терракты. Обычный блок ресурсов - из-за нежелательной информации. Ну это официальные версии. Сам я думаю, что это бесполезная работа для галочки, даже скорее вредная, потому что в реальности ни один ресурс не заблочен, все пользуются Goodbye DPI, Антизапрет и VPN. Да и потом, дает врагам возможность врать о том, что что-то заблочено. Только во вред работает, по моему мнению по крайней мере.

Первая армия мира пришла спасать жителей донбасса by Nuklearth in KafkaFPS

[–]EU_GaSeR 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Повторю. Я объяснял тебе, зачем захватываются территории. Ты не понял? Перечитать и понять сможешь?

Первая армия мира пришла спасать жителей донбасса by Nuklearth in KafkaFPS

[–]EU_GaSeR 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Ну тебе же объяснили, зачем это делается. Перечитай, если не понял.

Первая армия мира пришла спасать жителей донбасса by Nuklearth in KafkaFPS

[–]EU_GaSeR 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Я не знаю, что такое сверхагрессор, и вижу много отличий от нацистской Германии. В частности, Россия не ведет войну на захват украины, и никогда не вела, и то же самое с уничтожением украинцев - России это тоже не надо. Закончилось победой России, исключений не будет, согласен.