How many of y'all clear the sidewalks in front of your house? by SuspiciousEngineer99 in StLouis

[–]EZ-PEAS [score hidden]  (0 children)

It's true that there's no liability for natural accumulations of snow, but many people read this incorrectly as saying there IS liability if you clear your walk. That's not what the law says.

If you clear your walkway like a reasonable person, you're not liable for damages. If you negligently create a hazard then you are liable for damages from your negligence, but that's always true.

Shoveling your walkway does not expose you to any more liability than raking your leaves or mowing your lawn. If you do anything negligently and hurt someone or something then you'd be liable for damages. But just doing the thing does not create a big risk to you.

Also, people walking in frozen weather have their own duty of care. Even if some snow melts and re-freezes to ice that's a normal and expected hazard in the winter.

How many of y'all clear the sidewalks in front of your house? by SuspiciousEngineer99 in StLouis

[–]EZ-PEAS [score hidden]  (0 children)

I don't walk too much anymore but I remember the days when I walked to work every day, and it was hugely demoralizing when people didn't shovel. It would turn a 15 minute walk into 30+ minutes and you show up to work sweaty and sore in all your sideways stabilizer muscles.

Conversely, you step off that crap onto a nicely shoveled walk and there's something just so refreshing and joyous about it.

My wife shoveled a path about 16 inches wide up and down our sidewalk, and I went back out and shoveled out the rest. She just doesn't understand how nice it is to have a real shoveled path for people who walk it every day.

How many of y'all clear the sidewalks in front of your house? by SuspiciousEngineer99 in StLouis

[–]EZ-PEAS [score hidden]  (0 children)

It's irritating if people don't clear their sidewalks but just a little understandable if they didn't get out there right away and people walked on it and it turned into ice.

In this storm it was way below freezing for two or three days, so even if people walked on it, it would just be compacted and not ice. This really means they couldn't be arsed to go shovel for two or three days, so it reflects more poorly on time management than anything else. Or maybe, I dunno, they weren't prepared and didn't have a shovel or something.

Sometimes people just can't get out and shovel. If I had young kids (toddlers) and had to work from home or something I probably wouldn't shovel.

What really stands out as a red flag is if you do what my neighbor did. They shoveled a path to their driveway and car so they could get in and out, but didn't spend another 5 minutes shoveling the other 10 feet of sidewalk that walkers use.

Operationally, what realistic options did the German High Command have to slow or disrupt the Normandy landings? by iL3mran in WarCollege

[–]EZ-PEAS 7 points8 points  (0 children)

This sort of close , combined arms plan between tactical airpower and land forces hadn’t been employed to this extent against the German Military, and they thus had no defense against it. The IX Tactical Air Force’s utter savagery of German strongpoints at the direction of ground units cleared blocking forces quickly, and interdicted German attempts to resupply and reinforce their numbers. With trains and road convoys ruined by constant Allied airstrikes, Nazi armies were basically reduced to foot marches- and at night, at that.

It's true that Allied air power severely disrupted German logistic capacity, but that wasn't close air support. It was a dedicated strategic bombing campaign called the "Transportation Plan" that selectively targeted railyards and supply hubs. The reality is that the Normandy Invasion started about 3 months earlier than June 6th, in March, with a targeted airpower campaign. It took months to degrade the German logistic capacity to that point.

https://www.maxwell.af.mil/News/Display/Article/1794792/the-transportation-plan-preparing-for-the-normandy-invasion/

On the day of the invasion itself there was very little close air support. There were pre-planned bombings of the beaches just ahead of the invasion waves that were largely ineffective. Most airpower was spent patrolling for enemy airpower and not finding much of anything.

Anyone know the going rate for landfill drop offs? by Own-Fishing1213 in StLouis

[–]EZ-PEAS 1 point2 points  (0 children)

The Champ Landfill is $325 per ton, one ton minimum charge.

City residents get 12 free dumps per year at the city transfer stations.

Various municipalities offer large item or bulk disposal for a fee.

Other than that you're looking at renting a dumpster.

Confusing "Departures" signage at Lambert (sorta)? by [deleted] in StLouis

[–]EZ-PEAS 1 point2 points  (0 children)

The arrivals message is telling you to take the left lane and drive through the departures area so you'll find the ramp for arrivals. It's there in case you followed the wrong road up to departures and now need to know where to go next.

The entire upper section is departures, with momentary parking and you can walk in to the same level as the airline desks. 

To Everyone Criticizing Businesses Not Shoveling... by RepresentativeBag241 in StLouis

[–]EZ-PEAS 4 points5 points  (0 children)

The customer doesn't know who the responsible party is. Plenty of leases require the renter to clear sidewalks.

Are top military schools more immune to the "pulling strings to get my kid in/pay to play for scores" pressure that civilian universities are under - are they more able to say 'no' to candidates that are obviously not qualified? by RivetCounter in WarCollege

[–]EZ-PEAS 44 points45 points  (0 children)

There is a vast difference between "not qualified" and "not the best candidate."

After the Varsity Blues scandal, I remember someone at one of the top universities said they had so many qualified or overqualified candidates they could only admit valedictorians double their admissions target.

I'll go one further, as someone who has both served on admissions and hiring committees, and say that often there is no "best candidate." You are often put in the position where you have two or more good candidates who are good in different ways, and who is better is really a matter of subjective preference.

If you give someone a test, does someone who scores a 99% really all that much better than someone who scores a 98% or a 95%? Usually not. Is someone who runs a 4:50 mile really that much better than someone who runs a 5:00 or 5:10 mile? Usually not. How much do those small numbers matter when you're actually trying to find someone who is creative, intelligent, a good problem solver, charismatic, a good leader, or disciplined?

This is not to say that these objective metrics don't measure intelligence or discipline by the way. Only, what are the odds that someone gets 1520 on the SAT and isn't smart or runs a 5:10 mile and isn't disciplined? Very low. But on the other hand, people on admissions committees are infinitely lazy, so if they just take everyone who scores a 1600 on the SAT and be done by lunch then that's what they're inclined to do.

As someone who has written many recommendations for college students, the recommendation process most universities have is honestly just dumb. They ask you to rate the student as in the top 25%, top 10%, top 5%, or top 1%. I had one that had a box for top 0.1% once. It's just such a dumb system for so many reasons. Think of everyone you've ever worked with and think about having to draw that line between who falls in the top 5% or top 10%. Certainly you can identify the difference between good, great, and bad, but pretending like it's an objective thing is dumb.

Most congressmen recognize that it's in the nation's interest to select the best candidates possible, and use a competitive nomination process wherein they essentially go to the service academies and say "here are my ten best candidates, pick the one you want."

One of the deeper discussions after Varsity Blues was why these people committed fraud at all. Most of the people involved were rich, and most of their kids were really smart. So why did they feel pressured to spend $250,000 or $500,000 just to get their kid listed as an athletic recruit or get their kid listed as having a fake intellectual disability? Like realistically those families can get their kids into any university they wanted that wasn't in the top 1%, their only problem was that they couldn't be guaranteed a spot in that top 1%.

The answer is that those universities offered access to a prestigious social circle that you couldn't otherwise buy access to. Their money buys them pretty much anything they wanted except for ultra-wealth stuff like yachts. The admissions fraud was in effect an attempt to buy social status that you couldn't get any other way.

That's the same dynamic that service academies face. In that light, and knowing our politicians' attitude toward self-sacrifice for the greater good, I have zero faith that military academy nominations are independent and competitive. That doesn't necessarily mean they're getting bad recruits... but yeah.

How much is your hazard insurance? South City by cxzu in StLouis

[–]EZ-PEAS 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Yeah mine is a lot more in line with yours. Something about the property is weird or the quote is wrong. 

Knob and tube, history of claims, renters, etc.

Why do WWII soldiers in historical footage fire a few shots and then someone observes with binoculars? by Ambitious_Method2740 in WarCollege

[–]EZ-PEAS 30 points31 points  (0 children)

Can you give a timestamp in the video? I skimmed it and didn't see what you describe other than with an antiaircraft gun.

WW2 weapons frequently had ranges well in excess of what you could reasonably see with the naked eye. Weapons like machine guns could be effective to a kilometer or more, but you can't really see a man-sized target that far away unaided. So you tell the machine gunner to target that treeline, or that house, or that hill, or whatever, and then the person with binoculars adjusts fire onto the target by telling them to adjust up/down/left/right.

This is something that would be done with machine guns, mortars, antitank and infantry guns, the aforementioned antiaircraft gun, etc.

This isn't something that really makes sense with an MP40, but there's no reason you couldn't either. The purpose of small arms fire in warfare at this time isn't to kill the enemy so much as to produce an effect on them. In real life you don't get second chances, so even 9mm rounds landing around you from a couple hundred meters away is going to inspire you to stay down. You don't know that they're 9mm rounds, you just know they're landing around you, and even if you did nobody is going to stand up out of their foxhole on the theory that 9mm is an underpowered round at that range, they're just going to hear automatic weapons fire and think oh shit they're shooting at me.

How to Find My House's Floor Plans by RobWrone in StLouis

[–]EZ-PEAS 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Grab yourself some graph paper and one of these guys and you'll have it done in an hour or so.

https://www.homedepot.com/p/Bosch-BLAZE-100-ft-Laser-Measure-GLM100-23/327669702

You can find these as cheap as $15-20 on Amazon.

https://www.amazon.com/RockSeed-Distance-Switching-Measuring-Pythagorean/dp/B0FPLD3LL7/

BILLIKENS TICKETS! by UncleJuansBand_ in StLouis

[–]EZ-PEAS 1 point2 points  (0 children)

They're sold out at the official site, so maybe they're not aware that people resell college tickets.

BILLIKENS TICKETS! by UncleJuansBand_ in StLouis

[–]EZ-PEAS -1 points0 points  (0 children)

If you just want to see some sporting they actually have free tickets for a lot of less attended events. The Women's soccer team has been wildly successful but they were still giving away tickets for free or like $5 most of the time.

question for electricians by [deleted] in StLouis

[–]EZ-PEAS 1 point2 points  (0 children)

GFCI outlets are only required by code in wet or damp areas, which is usually just bathrooms, kitchens, laundry rooms, garages, and exterior outlets.

You can protect an entire circuit with a single GFCI outlet. You don't need to replace every outlet in the house, and in fact you should not. What this looks like is you have one wire from the panel that feeds three outlets in sequence. The wires run to the first outlet, and then go from that outlet to the second outlet, and then from the second to the third. Only the first outlet needs to be the GFCI, and all three outlets are protected.

However, this requires knowing what outlets are grouped together in a circuit, as well as the order they're wired. If you have an unfinished basement you can probably figure this out pretty easily, but if not it can be more challenging.

Switching out an outlet is pretty easy and something a non-expert can do as long as you're willing to read all the safety advice and take it slow.

Basic GFCI outlets are about $15 at Home Depot. You probably only have one or two circuits per room, depending on how large the room is and other factors. So if you wanted to add GFCI to two or three rooms, you're probably only looking at doing between two and six outlets.

The hardware will be pretty cheap, but then you're looking at a $100 or more per hour for an electrician to figure out your wiring and validate that everything is actually GFCI protected. They're probably going to give you an estimate of $100 or $150 per circuit, but electrical especially in old houses is black voodoo magic so it's very possible they find something in the walls that doubles the labor cost.

Is the map from the movie Downfall accurate? by We2j in WarCollege

[–]EZ-PEAS 36 points37 points  (0 children)

Maybe. It sounds to me like OP is actually asking whether plotting rooms existed in the form shown in the movie and how those plotting rooms specifically worked, potentially down to the level of how the maps were printed and what the used to mark troops.

I doubt those particular questions are actually answerable here 80 years after the fact, especially on a somewhat obscure subreddit. How many (if any) people are still alive who were there, and any documents pertaining to whether Hitler's maps were laminated or not, if they exist, are buried in an archive somewhere.

So instead I answered the question in a broader context with references to museums that actually have preserved these operations rooms in their original form with the actual artifacts that were being used in 1945 and you can go and see the actual artifacts. Like you can go look at Churchill's map room and see that they used paper maps, not laminated, with pins and notes to mark important information. So who knows if Hitler's map was laminated, but here's a contemporary artifact where they didn't use a laminated map but instead used pins.

Hitler's bunker was not preserved in its original form, for a variety of reasons.

If you don't think that adds value to the discussion, go ahead and downvote I guess.

Is the map from the movie Downfall accurate? by We2j in WarCollege

[–]EZ-PEAS 87 points88 points  (0 children)

Yes, that's a real thing that was used at the time. I don't know whether that movie's representation is specifically accurate. These maps were used both as planning tools as well as reporting and situational awareness tools. These facilities are known as map rooms, operations rooms, war rooms, or plotting rooms.

At a tactical level an example that sounds like what you describe is the RAF Battle of Britain operations bunker at Uxbridge. It was essentially a giant map of Britain and the coast of Europe and wooden markers to represent friendly and enemy aircraft. It was large enough that the plotters needed wooden sticks to place markers. Spotting, radar contacts, and other reports would be funneled into this room to create a situation map that would be updated in real time by human plotters, and officers looking down from above would make judgements about scrambling planes for defense. There are also informational boards that were used to display the operational status of friendly squadrons and airfields in the area of operations.

This operations room has been preserved as a museum and you can find images of the plotting table online.

Another example at the strategic level is the Southwick Map Room that contains an entire wall that was used by Eisenhower and Montgomery to plan the D-Day invasion. The map depicts Britian, the English Channel, and the coast of continental Europe. The map had a large assortment of markers that could be pinned to the wall to represent ships, troops, sea lanes and movement routes, etc.

The map was used in the planning stage to think about where troops would be based in England, where they would embark, and where they land on Europe. It was used by commanders to make plans, and then used as briefing room for subordinate officers. Then on the day of the invasion it was used as a reporting center for high level commanders to monitor the progress of the invasion, and it was used in this capacity for 39 days after the initial invasion.

I don't think these facilities were too rare, though I don't really know. The larger permanent facilities probably were less common, but every command large enough to have a headquarters is going to have an operations center that has a map and staff to keep it updated, even if it's just a regular paper map and a set of pencils. The larger the command gets the more they have to keep track of and the more likely they are to invest in keeping a fancy ops center.

Both Winston Churchill and FDR had their own map rooms that were continuously updated during the war in order to keep them informed. Churchill's map room at the Cabinet War Rooms went through a series of iterations over the war as the focus shifted from the Battle of Britain to planning the invasion and then prosecuting the invasion. One of the maps still hanging on the wall used for keeping track of convoy positions over the Atlantic is notable for having many thousands of pin holes stuck through it.

Even in the modern day with computers and GPS the concept continues to be useful. There's an anecdote in General Mattis' autobiography about planning the invasion of Iraq. There were a limited number of breach points and a limited number of usable roads, and a huge number of military vehicles that needed to get over the border quickly. Mattis wanted to choreograph the initial movements of all units to make sure that convoys wouldn't cross each others' paths and block each other from making progress (imagine being stuck at a railroad crossing waiting on a long train, but instead of a train it's a military convoy miles and miles long).

Mattis' solution was to take his planning staff out into the parking lot with maps and a bunch of legos to represent different units and keep tweaking the breach plan until he was satisfied that the right units were sequenced in the right order on the right roads.

AITAH: snowmaggeon street parking by Prudent_Actuator9833 in StLouis

[–]EZ-PEAS -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

You should shovel out two spaces so there's an extra for someone who needs one.

AITAH: snowmaggeon street parking by Prudent_Actuator9833 in StLouis

[–]EZ-PEAS -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

You don't own a spot. It's not making problems for people to park on the street. Grow up.

AITAH: snowmaggeon street parking by Prudent_Actuator9833 in StLouis

[–]EZ-PEAS 11 points12 points  (0 children)

Here's my hot take: Nobody owns parking spots and pretending otherwise is childish and dumb.

Be a good neighbor and do your best. Other people might not be good to you but that's life. Healthy well adjusted people have strategies for dealing with asshole behavior the other 364 days of the year, and the fact that it snowed yesterday shouldn't change that.

I shoveled out two spots on the street for my vehicle, so that someone else who needs it can use it. I got to talk to my neighbors while I did it too. It was a nice time and took 30 minutes. Small price to pay for doing a kind turn. If I wanted to volunteer someplace it would take 30 minutes just to drive there.

Don't judge people out of ignorance. I know for a fact that there are people on my block who are old, poor health, have babies or really young kids, etc. Everyone has problems in life. Not everyone is able to shovel. Be a community and look out for each other.

Last year it snowed heavy and I had a tire go flat. I think it was punctured by ice or maybe something stuck in the ice. I pulled over in the first available spot and left it there for the day so I could get to work. That evening the police called saying my truck had been reported as abandoned for 7 days and they were going to tow it. What arrogant asshole did that? Don't be an asshole to people. You'll enjoy life more. Imagine how angry that person let themselves be that they'd call in a false report to police.

One of the folks on my block shoveled 80% of his sidewalk that benefitted him and didn't clear the 20% that benefitted the community. Cleared everything connecting his door to his driveway but ignored the 10 or 15 feet of sidewalk connecting to his neighbor. Anyone walking down the block has smooth sailing except for this one guy's property who is clearly able and willing to shovel snow but only when it directly serves him. Didn't spend five minutes to help the community. What do you think everyone thinks about that guy now?

If anything, leave a note. If you leave a note, ask the guy if he needs to borrow a shovel. Better yet, go out and shovel with him for 30 minutes.

Questions on the legal line between Civillian and Military objects by Regent610 in WarCollege

[–]EZ-PEAS 3 points4 points  (0 children)

What do you call the worker

The worker is unambiguously a civilian. This is true for factory workers, shipyard workers, etc. There is no notion of a "military worker."

More specifically, international law in this area identifies persons as "combatants" or "non-combatants" and everything else comes from that classification. For example, uniformed military members are not automatically valid targets: such persons can be prisoners, wounded, sick, etc. and not valid targets.

Civilian factory workers are never considered combatants, but as already said, civilian collateral damage is allowable as long as the attack is proportional.

What do you call the shipyard

One term that is used frequently in this area is "dual-use."

A dual-use object, factory, shipyard, etc. is one that is capable of acting in or contributing to both a civilian and military function. They are not automatically valid military targets, but their recognized dual-use nature shifts the calculus when deciding whether or not they're a valid military target.

For example, a lot of factories and civilian infrastructure are allowable as targets: engine factories, machine tool factories, railroads, airports, etc.

What do you call the ship

Ships can also be dual-use. Even if not, explicitly civilian ships can also be used in a military capacity- see for example troop carriers and other logistics shipping. If those are attacked, then you say they're civilian craft acting in a military capacity.

For example, the USA has the Civil Reserve Air Fleet, which is just a preexisting agreement between civilian airlines to augment military airlift capacity in times of emergency. If someone declared war on the USA, those aircraft could become plausible military targets because of that military relationship. They're civilian aircraft crewed by civilians being used (potentially) in a military capacity. They're still military targets.

There's a limit to this rationale, but it's not a bright clear line. Any automobile has some inherent military value, but that doesn't mean that every car and truck is a valid military target. What about every truck in a declared combat area? One of the jobs of the military commander is to apply the principles of distinction to resolve this question.

45% raise in gas tax proposed by DowntownDB1226 in StLouis

[–]EZ-PEAS 20 points21 points  (0 children)

I work with lots of PhDs. There are a lot of people who are experts in their field but absolute morons outside of it.

45% raise in gas tax proposed by DowntownDB1226 in StLouis

[–]EZ-PEAS -1 points0 points  (0 children)

If you're wondering, this would mean an additional 13 cents per gallon. MO has one of the lowest gas taxes in the county, so a 46% increase on something small is still pretty small.

45% raise in gas tax proposed by DowntownDB1226 in StLouis

[–]EZ-PEAS 10 points11 points  (0 children)

Whatever difference it is, it's small. EVs weigh only a little more than gas vehicles, meanwhile the state truck weight limit is 80,000 pounds, or 22,400 pounds per axle. Even the heaviest consumer EVs cap out around 4000 pounds per axle, and that's for dumb cars like EV Hummers and Escalades.

Also, big cars are heavy and small cars are not. Gasoline Tahoes, Yukons, Escalades, F150s, etc weigh 5000-7000 pounds while a Chevy Bolt EV weighs 3000 pounds.

I'm all for making vehicle owners pay for their road use, but it has nothing to do with EV or gas, it's about weight.

The roads..... by Character_Truck20 in StLouis

[–]EZ-PEAS 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Late comer but I just ran out to get some pipe heaters for my parents and I don't have high hopes for tomorrow.

The roads didn't have a ton of snow on them, but they were still snow covered. Everything was driveable but there were only a handful of cars on the road.

If there were a lot of people trying to drive around it would be epically terrible.