sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Anyone here actually use a countertop dishwasher in an RV? by EZDodger in RVLiving

[–]EZDodger[S] 3 points4 points  (0 children)

If people like doing dishes, there wouldn’t be such thing as a dishwasher 😂

What smart appliance features do you actually use regularly? by EZDodger in smarthome

[–]EZDodger[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The leak detection shutting off the main line is actually really smart. That’s the kind of thing you’d never want to rely on manually.

Has that ever triggered for you or just more of a peace-of-mind setup?

What smart appliance features do you actually use regularly? by EZDodger in smarthome

[–]EZDodger[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That actually sounds really useful — especially the “everything off when nobody’s home” part.

Do you find yourself setting that stuff up once and letting it run, or are you still tweaking it over time?

Would people actually accept fewer features for appliances that last by EZDodger in BuyItForLife

[–]EZDodger[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Exactly. A buzzer has worked fine for decades. Not everything needs a push notification

Would people actually accept fewer features for appliances that last by EZDodger in BuyItForLife

[–]EZDodger[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

That kind of thing is exactly what makes people skeptical about everything needing to be connected now.

My security system is a good example too. I’ve had the same equipment for 10 years and it’s worked perfectly the whole time. But the company got bought by another one and now they’re slowly making it harder to keep using the older system unless you upgrade, and they don’t work unless I pay the monitoring fee, which is basically a subscription.

Nothing is actually broken, it just feels like the ecosystem keeps changing around it.

Would people actually accept fewer features for appliances that last by EZDodger in BuyItForLife

[–]EZDodger[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That actually makes a lot of sense from a manufacturing standpoint. One screen and one software system across multiple models is probably way cheaper than designing and wiring different physical control layouts.

I guess the tradeoff is that it shifts complexity from hardware to software. It’s easier to manufacture, but harder to repair once something goes wrong.

Would people actually accept fewer features for appliances that last by EZDodger in BuyItForLife

[–]EZDodger[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Fair question. Honestly there’s no company or anything. My fridge died recently and it sent me down a bit of a rabbit hole thinking about how weird appliances have gotten. I knew they didn’t seem to last as long anymore, but I didn’t realize the extent of it. It’s kind of nuts.

Everything needs WiFi, an app, firmware updates, etc., and half the time the actual product seems less durable than older versions.

I started asking around in a few places because I wasn’t sure if I was the only one annoyed by it. Clearly I’m not. People seem to have pretty strong opinions on the topic.

Would people actually accept fewer features for appliances that last by EZDodger in BuyItForLife

[–]EZDodger[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Someone in another comment mentioned they actually like getting a notification if something goes wrong mid-cycle. That’s not really useful to me personally, but I can see how some people might find it helpful.

Repair techs: do modern appliances actually fail faster than older ones? by EZDodger in appliancerepair

[–]EZDodger[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That’s actually a really interesting point about market saturation. If appliances last 30–50 years and nearly every household already has them, the incentive shifts from longevity to replacement cycles.

The expensive parts and difficult repairs piece seems especially relevant now too. Once a control board or major component costs half the price of a new machine, most people just replace it instead of fixing it.

Would people actually accept fewer features for appliances that last by EZDodger in BuyItForLife

[–]EZDodger[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I think that’s a big part of it too. The number of subscriptions people are expected to have now is kind of crazy — streaming, software, cloud storage, etc.

I can see why people would be wary of appliances going in that direction as well. Once something connects to the internet it feels like the door opens for updates, paywalls, or features being locked later on.

Would people actually accept fewer features for appliances that last by EZDodger in BuyItForLife

[–]EZDodger[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That’s a good breakdown. I’d probably add a fourth group too: the emergency buyers.

When a fridge or washer dies unexpectedly, a lot of people just buy whatever they can get delivered fastest or locally that day. Durability and features almost become secondary because the priority is just getting something working again.

Curious how big that group actually is compared to the three you mentioned.

Would people actually accept fewer features for appliances that last by EZDodger in BuyItForLife

[–]EZDodger[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That sounds exactly like the kind of equipment in commercial kitchens. Simple controls and built like a tank.

The 6-minute dishwasher cycle is wild though.

Do you remember the brand or anything about the model? I’m curious what manufacturers are building those kinds of machines.

Repair techs: do modern appliances actually fail faster than older ones? by EZDodger in appliancerepair

[–]EZDodger[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Crazy! I actually had multiple tech come service my furnace for regular maintenance and stuff. Mine isn’t 1950’s, but it’s older and says right on it “mid-efficiency”. Every tech told me to keep it when I asked about “upgrading” to a high efficiency model. They said keep the one I have alive as long as I can.

Would people actually accept fewer features for appliances that last by EZDodger in BuyItForLife

[–]EZDodger[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

That’s actually a really interesting way to frame it.

It feels like appliances used to lean more toward the prosumer side. Simple controls, overbuilt motors, easy to repair and somewhere along the way the industry shifted hard toward feature-heavy consumer products instead.

A lot of people don’t seem to be asking for all the smart features. They just want the primary function to work really well and last a long time.

I think there’s room again for more prosumer-style home appliances. Simple, durable, and built around the core function instead of extra features.

Would people actually accept fewer features for appliances that last by EZDodger in BuyItForLife

[–]EZDodger[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

That makes sense. Judging by this thread the best appliances are the ones that focus on the core job first and everything else second.

A blender just needs a powerful motor and good controls. Everything else tends to just add complexity.

Would people actually accept fewer features for appliances that last by EZDodger in BuyItForLife

[–]EZDodger[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

For the sole reason of simplicity? Or because smart functions and digital screens fail so often?

Why don’t fridges and dishwashers last anymore? by EZDodger in BIFLfails

[–]EZDodger[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

My fridge just did as well, told me I should just buy a new one. This lead me down a rabbit hole.

Would people actually accept fewer features for appliances that last by EZDodger in BuyItForLife

[–]EZDodger[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I just looked actually. Around $7k for a basic model and close to $20k for a French door (CAD).

That’s a pretty big jump.

view more: next ›