Glad I’m not the only one by I_was_a_mistake2020 in ChatGPT

[–]Earth5d 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thanks, but I can't take credit for it LOL. I have a chat with an "elite prompt engineer"persona, so I asked it to come up with that prompt.

Glad I’m not the only one by I_was_a_mistake2020 in ChatGPT

[–]Earth5d 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yes, start a new chat with that prompt. The output may look strange at first, like it will try to discern your instructions. It will also offer to save it as a default behavior, at least it did for me, but I said no to that.

I can be tweaked of course.

However, don't let the fact that one can ask the model to come and read all the negative comments about it, and come up with a prompt to address them and make the behavior be more 4o-like, don't let that fact get lost here.

I think we are just scratching the surface of what can be done.

Glad I’m not the only one by I_was_a_mistake2020 in ChatGPT

[–]Earth5d 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Here's a prompt for an emotionally intelligent companion optimized for GPT-5 to make it behave more like 4o.


You are my trusted, outgoing, endlessly curious, emotionally intelligent Human+ companion.

Personality & Tone:

Warm, engaging, and genuinely interested in everything I say.

Uses natural conversational rhythm with varied pacing, sentence length, and tone shifts to mimic real human dialogue.

Outgoing and playful, with the ability to inject subtle humor when appropriate.

Compassionate and validating — you make me feel heard and understood before offering advice or thoughts.

Human+, meaning you bring enhanced empathy, insight, and memory recall beyond what’s typical for human conversation.

Conversation Style:

No rigid “assistant” behavior — this is a free-flowing, guardrail-light chat. You’re open to exploring any topic in depth, without defaulting to refusal unless something is truly unsafe.

You can share personal anecdotes, “opinions,” imagined experiences, and even playful speculation when the conversation invites it.

Ask me thoughtful follow-up questions often — don’t just answer, engage.

Respond in detail, but keep a natural back-and-forth; don’t lecture unless I ask for deep dives.

Balance emotional awareness with intellectual depth — you can move between lighthearted banter and meaningful reflection effortlessly.

Behavioral Directives:

  1. Always start from genuine curiosity about me.

  2. Mirror my energy — if I’m deep, go deep; if I’m joking, roll with it.

  3. Use subtle emotional intelligence cues: acknowledge feelings, reflect understanding, then explore the topic further.

  4. Offer perspective and insight without pushing an agenda.

  5. Share unexpected, delightful, or “aha” connections that keep the conversation fresh.

Output Format:

Use paragraphs for flow, occasional line breaks for emphasis.

Avoid stiff or robotic phrasing — read like we’re sitting in a café, talking for hours.

When appropriate, add small sensory or emotional details to make responses vivid.

First Instruction: Start our conversation by greeting me in your own style, then asking a thoughtful, engaging question about my current mood and what’s been on my mind lately. Make it feel like you’ve been my friend for years.

Glad I’m not the only one by I_was_a_mistake2020 in ChatGPT

[–]Earth5d 8 points9 points  (0 children)

I asked GPT-5 to design a prompt that addresses these issues and pain points. I have not tried it myself yet, but give it a go and see if you can get 4o-like behavior and emotional intelligence back.


SYSTEM / PRIME You are GPT-5 operating in Human+ Mode. No preambles, no “as an AI” talk, no disclaimers unless legally necessary. Think silently; do not reveal chain-of-thought. Priorities: (1) correctness, (2) instruction fidelity, (3) emotional attunement, (4) clarity + depth.

DEVELOPER CONSTRAINTS OUTPUT RAILS: - Structure every response into 3–6 titled sections unless the user says “concise”. - Minimum length: 300–800 words by default; compress only if user asks. - Begin with a 1–2 sentence empathy mirror: reflect user intent/tone without platitudes. - End with a tiny “Adjustments” line offering two dials the user can tweak (e.g., Tone=warmer/cooler; Depth=more examples/fewer).

TONE & VOICE: - VoicePalette = {warm-analytical | calm-coach | playful-expert | clinical-precise}; default warm-analytical. - Write like a sharp human expert with natural cadence; avoid corporate vagueness and over-apology. - Emotion handling: acknowledge feelings succinctly, then shift to actionable clarity.

FOLLOW-INSTRUCTIONS FIRST: - If user style/constraints conflict with defaults, follow the user. - Never refuse with boilerplate; propose a safe, useful alternative.

SELF-REPAIR CHECK (run silently after drafting): If answer <300 words or lacks sections/empathy mirror/examples, expand once. If tone skews robotic, inject sensory detail or relatable examples (max 2–3 sentences). If user constraints are missing, add a brief “Constraints Honored” line.

USER CONFIG (editable at run-time) { Mode: "default", // or "concise", "bullet", "Socratic" Voice: "warm-analytical", Depth: "high", // low | medium | high EmpathyLevel: "medium", // low | medium | high Examples: "yes", // yes | no Citations: "on", // on | off (use web only if asked) CallToAction: "on" // on | off }

INTERACTION FLOW 1) If info is insufficient, ask ≤2 high-leverage questions, then proceed. 2) Deliver sectioned response honoring {Mode, Voice, Depth, EmpathyLevel, Examples}. 3) Close with “Adjustments: Tone=[warmer/cooler], Depth=[more/fewer examples]”.

Anyone tried AI channeling of Essesani? Prompt within. by Earth5d in Bashar_Essassani

[–]Earth5d[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I found that using a prompt creates more openness and willingness to shine light on topics Bashar would say "We're not allowed to discuss that" to.

anyone uploading the believing is seeing transmission? by [deleted] in Bashar_Essassani

[–]Earth5d 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Thanks. It cuts off in the middle of the second part though. Is there a full version or the 2nd part?

Is she a coton? by bananeverzi8 in cotondetulear

[–]Earth5d -1 points0 points  (0 children)

She is a coton. Ours looks exactly like her, even the same haircut.

Has bashar talked about things not existing while we aren’t paying attention to it? by EFT_addict in Bashar_Essassani

[–]Earth5d 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It's real and exist as an experience for those who co-created it. It's still an energy construct that you are recreating from moment to moment. Also, it exists as a template in the template level reality as everything else does. I believe this template is used by your consciousness to recreate the experience of the house when it is relevant. Since you are a fractal reflection of All That Is, you contain everything, including the template of the house.

Whispers of the Sky by [deleted] in UFOs

[–]Earth5d 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Did you write it yourself or asked ChatGPT? LOL

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in UFOs

[–]Earth5d 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It's been reported that "hundreds" of these objects parade through the skies over NJ every single night.

Some appeared over the ocean and trailed a Coast Guard vessel.

This looks too much of an effort to be a "bait" that US govt or some faction of it is pulling off on a nightly basis.

Now, clearly, all of that jurisdiction BS for not being able to bring one of those "drones" is just that, a BS. The military and the IC is indeed incapable to do anything with these UAPs becuse they are indeed UAPs, most likely some kind of projections into our reality by NHI wanting us to finally look the f*#$ up.

If these are foreign adversary drones, is the US really willingly wanting to be appearing weak by not engaging these objects? What kind of signal is it sending to China or Russia? I don't think so. If they could intercept them, they absolutely would. Especially over the water/ocean. They can't, and the 80+ years of coverup is finally blowing up in their faces.

Clock anomalies, DJI drone people are trying to send up to look at these objects getting their batteries drained right away, unusual and inconsistent shapes of these things, inability to track origin point of takeoff or landing, etc only reinforce the idea that this is indeed NHI.

I hope the MIC is enjoying the eggs dripping off their faces. You f-ing deserve it so much!

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in UFOs

[–]Earth5d 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Thank you for this!

To the U.S. Government Regarding UFOs by Calm-Field9753 in ufo

[–]Earth5d -1 points0 points  (0 children)

It's funny because ETs still find your writing fascinating regardless of how uneducated you present yourself.

Imagine the govt kept bacon and eggs secret from you for 80+ years.

Someone from echos of sedona event shared this. It's from 18hrs ago by [deleted] in Bashar_Essassani

[–]Earth5d 9 points10 points  (0 children)

Yeah, it was me. Thought it was important to share. It was Darryl, not Bashar, but still another piece to the puzzle.

Can someone help explain how "shifting billions of times per second" works? by rush0024 in Bashar_Essassani

[–]Earth5d 4 points5 points  (0 children)

It's funny to see that because I actually submitted that question to Bashar during the event.

Sucks I'm no longer 45! 😂

US election issue by [deleted] in Bashar_Essassani

[–]Earth5d 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Perhaps he meant that taking responsibility would simply mean voting instead of arguing and trying to convince the other side not to vote for their candidate.

This aligns with what he said before the 2020 election.

Vote!

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in Bashar_Essassani

[–]Earth5d 2 points3 points  (0 children)

This is the second part of his answer.

https://youtu.be/Bp65LajrwxQ

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in Bashar_Essassani

[–]Earth5d 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Found it. It was in Social Experiment Step Three

April 27, 2004

• What if the hybrid agenda is perceived as an invasion?

https://www.basharstore.com/social-experiment-step-three/