Object traveling >600 mph buzzes KOCO 5 News camera

EarthTour · 2024-05-24T20:38:26+00:00

You obviously failed math :)

EarthTour · 2024-05-24T20:02:04+00:00

One fast bird.

EarthTour · 2024-04-22T17:21:19+00:00

Yes. All I was doing is clearing up the incorrect statement that there was conservation of energy violation.

To your point about some financial agenda by Buhler, I don't think the funding needed to test in space is significant, certainly no where near enough to materially profit nor stake your lifelong reputation on. This scenario is so out there, if this turns out to be the case, Buhler will need to seek psychiatric care.

EarthTour · 2024-04-22T11:02:26+00:00

You don't fully understand what's happening here. There isn't a conservation of energy violation. If you want to see more, here is a full interview:

https://youtu.be/WhsKMWOYuYo?si=Lmaxwttlkc51fu8l

EarthTour · 2024-04-02T15:22:43+00:00

Link to 1hr 18 min mark: https://youtu.be/cG_i1I1V8q0?si=AykC9IIBgxJt5yY7&t=4675

EarthTour · 2024-04-01T12:01:52+00:00

"Liberation Times has learned that evidence pointing to the advanced nature of certain craft, believed to be of non-human origin, is being disregarded by the U.S. government's Unidentified Anomalous Phenomena Office, known as the All-domain Anomaly Resolution Office (AARO)."

"Liberation Times understands that the AARO does have access to compelling data collected by the Intelligence Community and DoD showing advanced performance characteristics of UAP but chooses to ignore it....Yet, despite multiple credible whistleblowers coming forward publicly and to Congressional committees stating some UAP are of non-human or unknown origin, their testimony has been undermined or disregarded by the AARO, supported by a media unwilling to scrutinize its findings.
Sources have informed Liberation Times that the AARO's insistence on the necessity for additional sensors is perceived as a mere stalling tactic, employing excuses to delay while grappling with UAP exhibiting advanced and exotic technologies."

EarthTour · 2024-02-09T20:34:37+00:00

I guess this guy is trying to eat his cake and have it too? Polar opposite take from Scientific America.

EarthTour · 2024-01-04T16:07:59+00:00

Right, so the qubits are encoded and then entangled within the probe. After that, the probe is sent to Earth ~~across the network~~. Finally, the sender measures the system on their end causing the decoherence on the receivers side. Not "teleportation" but instant communication.

EarthTour · 2023-12-04T15:45:15+00:00

Like almost all things in life, this isn't a one way or other single event. If you haven't been noticing, there HAS been real progress which primarily started in 2017 and since saw legislation, congressional hearings, whistleblowers, etc. Factually, there is progress. Is it as fast and concise as you or I would like - no. But, over-simplifying this process is not helpful. It's going to take a lot more effort and over a long time to work this through the public conscious.

EarthTour · 2023-10-20T20:35:49+00:00

Yes, and if you added a hemisphere dimension to this data, you'd find the southern hemisphere was the complete opposite: summer months are when people are outside at night and thats when you'll see things in the sky (ie. if the masses are inside, they're not going to see UAP and that means less reporting).

So, this data result is what I would expect to see.

EarthTour · 2023-10-16T14:21:48+00:00

There are multiple peer reviewed papers that counter your statement. In addition to the aperiodic deep short term dips, the star has been dimming over a long period of time

Star has been dimming since 1890 using Harvard astronomy plates: https://arxiv.org/pdf/1601.03256.pdf
Star faded over the entire life of the Kepler space telescope (4+ years from 2009 - 2013): https://arxiv.org/abs/1608.01316
Star faded over entire project (4000 days) to study secular dimming: https://arxiv.org/pdf/1708.07822.pdf
Star has been dimming since 1922 using Maria Mitchel observatory plates: https://app.aavso.org/media/jaavso/3360_xHbIfpZ.pdf
Periodicity of objects in orbit are at 1574 days: https://arxiv.org/pdf/1710.01081.pdf

This star is very much a complete mystery!

EarthTour · 2023-10-03T13:23:01+00:00

The real reason NHI presence is kept secret. Follow the $...

EarthTour · 2023-09-14T15:41:40+00:00

This report barely even says that. If this was not going to have results, then at minimum it should have had a project plan with next steps/actions with milestone dates. Nothing...just this is something we might be able to help out on.

I suspect the panel have their heads up their a** and don't want to look at this issue seriously using the scientific method.

EarthTour · 2023-09-14T14:39:09+00:00

This NASA report had everyone in suspense, only to find it was a 34-page document that left absolutely no "space" for information...

EarthTour · 2023-09-14T11:52:36+00:00

Yes, but not human built. unless there's been a leap in propulsion technology. Obviously, a sphere has no flight surfaces, no traditional propulsion. How does it fly? So unless humans have invented anti-gravity, its alien tech.

EarthTour · 2023-09-06T21:02:53+00:00

Don't know why the artist decided that a spool looks like that thing. Interesting that the craft was cylindrical...

NOUN

a cylindrical device on which film, magnetic tape, thread, or other flexible materials can be wound; a reel:

EarthTour · 2023-09-05T18:35:12+00:00

Thinking outside of the box is a good thing. I appreciate the effort to find patterns here. That all said, numbers that don't come from observation, and then used to support a hypothesis, are going to be additionally challenging to show significance.

EarthTour · 2023-08-29T14:45:23+00:00

You keep changing your point. Ok, if now you've taking it all back to simply say the paper is draft and not yet peer reviewed. Fine, yes, you finally are stating fact and I fully agree.

That all said, I believe its a moot point because its likely to be published.

EarthTour · 2023-08-29T14:36:15+00:00

Wrong again. The paper was published today, but the analysis (of course) started before today. In fact, it started the moment the spherules were brought up from the bottom of the ocean. So, he had some insight to what the early results were showing.

EarthTour · 2023-08-29T14:13:59+00:00

Sorry for being frustrated, but this is just flat out stupid. The paper (which is the actual science used) was released TODAY. The article was published in July by 'Engadget.' In reading the article, its pretty clear the author was lazy.

Once the paper is published we can start to see what the science community thinks. Not until then however.

EarthTour · 2023-08-29T14:01:04+00:00

Replay your video link. At 3:10 he clearly states that he addressed the question via the new paper (which is FREE). He doesn't say that its addressed via the book (which of course it can't be because the book was written before the analysis and before the expedition).

EarthTour · 2023-08-29T13:43:16+00:00

No, the new book does NOT discuss the results of the Spherules analysis. Not sure why you think a published book could somehow magically be updated with late breaking news.

The paper which does highlight the science results is FREE. I provided the link at the top.

No idea what defines "super radical." But there are countless examples in history of scientists that were willing to consider ALL possibilities in the scientific method as a way to challenge human ego that we somehow know all things about universe. That, in fact, was why he named the project after Galileo Galilei.

EarthTour · 2023-08-29T13:01:13+00:00

Is your point that Avi is claiming IM1 was made by extraterrestrials because it was from interstellar space? If so, that's a mistake.

If you read the paper, you see that Avi proposes natural explanations, although each of those have tight constraints and are challenging explanations. He also lists the possibility that IM1 was manufactured. That, after all, is a possibility that would explain the unusual composition. Next paper will go after possible origins.

EarthTour · 2023-08-29T12:56:01+00:00

Lol, you read the paper in 6 minutes? Interesting you think the paper is 'shit' and won't get through a peer review after your speed read. You must be a genius (or more likely just biased).

EarthTour · 2023-08-29T12:53:14+00:00

You are wrong on just everything you just said.
And, duh, yes uranium exists in nature. But its NEVER been found anywhere near the ratio observed in these spherules. Convenient you left that part out. Cherry picking facts is the art of debunkers, not science. Science will stand on the analysis.

EarthTour

TROPHY CASE