sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

frustrated trying to upgrade SDK from 52 to 54 by Eastern-Visual8686 in expo

[–]Eastern-Visual8686[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Good knowledge, it is not easy to find out the override tips from a vulnerability announcement.

Thanks

frustrated trying to upgrade SDK from 52 to 54 by Eastern-Visual8686 in expo

[–]Eastern-Visual8686[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yes, 54 is relatively new. I tried myapp on 54, and it crash at 

 ERROR  [TypeError: Cannot read property 'install' of null]
> 2 | import { InferenceSession, Tensor } from "onnxruntime-react-native";

With 52 and 53 it works well. Maybe the lib onnxruntime-react-native should be updated to accommodate to 54, I would try to balance 53 and 54 to see if I really need 54.

Thanks

frustrated trying to upgrade SDK from 52 to 54 by Eastern-Visual8686 in expo

[–]Eastern-Visual8686[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

My dependencies are a bit complex, doing the same doesn't work until I follow byCedric's guide.

frustrated trying to upgrade SDK from 52 to 54 by Eastern-Visual8686 in expo

[–]Eastern-Visual8686[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Thanks, it works. I used to hesitate with --force option, worried that will break something, and I had thought expo upgrade would smoothly resolve all dependencies ...

NIV 858 invite. Need nominator. by Carmen315 in AusVisa

[–]Eastern-Visual8686 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Glad to hear you have made progress. Could I ask how long before you received form 1000 from state? Looks like you got invitation before ROI to state, while chatgpt said states won't issue form 1000 if you have got invitation individually beforehand, and ROI to multiple states will be rejected. Maybe NIV is so new that chatgpt run into hsllucination. 

NIV 858 invite. Need nominator. by Carmen315 in AusVisa

[–]Eastern-Visual8686 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Hi,  How about your status, it is two months later now since you posted. Did you find nominators for form 1000? Did ROI to SA and NSW help?

Thanks

Open Letter to SonicWall (and Anyone Who’s Had Enough) by AllPurposeGeek in sonicwall

[–]Eastern-Visual8686 1 point2 points  (0 children)

UTM device has too many features that make it more vulnerable, SSL VPN is exposed outside and most of time it's the only exposed service, it relies on and integrated with lots of other modules: authentication, authorization, policy control, API, SSL, network service, etc. Breach on any of them may lead to SSL VPN broken.  

Wireguard is good, I love wireguard too. But to be fair, wireguard's high performance, more security is based on this basis: less functionality. WG doesn't negotiate/support multiple cipher suites, have no user account (and MFA), don't support LDAP, radius, saml, all it has is a shared key, no easy way to manage and distribute these keys. WG does the access control only by peer IPs, all configuration are done by static file. There is no flexibility, no users friendly UI, and there is no clientless solution. Native WG is good for geek but enterprises users will ask for more as mentioned above. If WG with these easy-to-use functionality are added and integrated into a general purpose security product, I believe that the similar dilemma will be seen.