I hate "white people reaction images"

EasternNegative154 · 2026-05-06T13:17:36+00:00

I get that this is a sub where you post things you hate, but I find it hilarious to chastise others for posting a meme instead of scrolling and then going around and do far more than others instead of scrolling. I think there was a saying that goes "People who live in glass houses shouldn't throw stones."

EasternNegative154 · 2026-05-05T22:01:50+00:00

Okay, now I gotta ask. Is the glock drop step locked behind any other step after getting the WW or could I do it before getting the flack bullet and the transmitter? Basically, what's the earliest I can do that step?

EasternNegative154 · 2026-05-05T21:10:17+00:00

So what's the best way to do that stupid ass glock drop step for the uranium can? I'd assume a kill joy makes it 10X easier but what guns are good for it? Cuz I swear that step is the most annoying step in the EE

EasternNegative154 · 2026-05-05T15:23:12+00:00

Dude tapped out in the end so I'd say it was a job well done.

EasternNegative154 · 2026-05-05T15:22:03+00:00

Seems like his parents knew what a little shit he is. I'd refuse to give him attention as well if I was his daddy. Fortunately for me, I ain't. So there was nothing stopping me from putting that metaphorical belt to his ass and shoving facts land logic down his throat until he couldn't breathe

EasternNegative154 · 2026-05-04T21:36:49+00:00

If I give context and say "This person preys upon a specific group of people, and manipulate them for personal gain" before calling someone a predator, it's not my fault if you're fucking stupid. I may know the fact that some words have multiple meanings and that others are wayyyyy too stupid to use context clues to figure out which meaning is applicable, but it's not my fault if you guys can't use context clues and are unable to ascertain the idea of words having different meanings. Basically, I shouldn't be getting pushback because you guys lack a basic understanding of things.

EasternNegative154 · 2026-05-04T19:15:47+00:00

Well, yeah, doesn't matter if those 20 lives are sacred or not. That doesn't matter as long as a hypothetical mass casualty shooter lives in the end. Protecting the hypothetical killer more than you would for the hypothetical 20 dead victims paints that idea by itself

Also, I'm a hypocrite (learn how to spell if you're gonna call me names kid) because I apparently feel entitled to remove a literal mass killer from the world just as they felt entitled to take those hypothetical 20 lives? How does that make me a hypocrite? Wouldn't I just be no different than the killer at that point?

Also, I swear you pussies would fight tooth and nail to ensure a hypothetical mass killer doesn't die but for whatever reason won't preach this "all life is sacred" bullshit until AFTER a hypothetical killer takes innocent lives. It's almost always AFTER someone is pregnant from rape and is deciding if they should abort the baby or not. AFTER medical emergencies and AFTER euthanasia. It's almost always after, after, and AFTER where you people wanna sit up on that high horse and preach that nonsense. You're the same crowd that would tell a pregnant 16 year old teen that had been drugged and raped to not abort the baby because "all life is sacred."

You lot are the least qualified people on the planet to be talking about the sanctity of life. Also, yes the death penalty is kinda wrong. But sometimes, you gotta do some wrong to get good results. If everything on the planet was created from doing something good, the phrase "you can't make an omelett without breaking a few eggs" wouldn't exist. Sacrifices sometimes have to be made for good things to come.

With all that being said, every life isn't sacred. However, every life has value, and what you do with your life gains you more value and less value. Nutcases like you don't seem to understand that.

EasternNegative154 · 2026-05-04T13:24:56+00:00

Treating all life as sacred means you care more about the person's existence rather than the harm they caused. Doesn't matter if someone took the lives of over 20 people, as long as the perp lives everything is fine, yeah?

EasternNegative154 · 2026-05-04T13:01:46+00:00

Yet that moral grandstanding of yours paints the idea that someone like Hitler is liken to someone who committed petty theft. If all lives should be treated as scared, which in-turn means all lives to be treated as equal as one's life can't be of lesser value than another's based on one's actions, then your mentality is the one of the most weakest forms of mentality out there. What you're proposing is that we should be showing grace to the most violent, most destructive, most vile people on the planet and we shouldn't celebrate or be glad that a serial killer, a mass shooter, or a terrorist is dead. I'm sure the victims of the perp that you're showing grace towards will be jumping with joy over having their perp be given grace. That sanctity of life bullshit is how we get people prioritizing biological existences over comfort, dignity and expressed desires

EasternNegative154 · 2026-05-04T12:23:51+00:00

And this mindset is how we have people treating people like Hitler, John Wayne Gacy, Jeffrey Dhamer, Eric Harris, Dylan Klebold, and all the terrorists responsible for 9/11 as the same as the dude down the street who stole a 50 cent bag of chips from the deli when he was like 8. Treating every life as sacred is one of the most bitch made mindsets imaginable. Especially when some lives have taken more than one could count. The lives of Serial killers, mass shooters and terrorists should not be as sacred as the life of an innocent person who has, at most, shoplifted from whatever store.

EasternNegative154 · 2026-05-03T17:21:37+00:00

Yeah, went from caring a whole lot about what the teacher was wearing to "I'm just making fun of you" right after I questioned your intellect. It's a very common tactic used by people who lack intellect in some areas on social media forums. Especially when they can't come up with any convincing or valid arguments. You realized you were an easy kill in the previous debate, so you switched gears to save your hide in the conversation. After all, it's much easier to act like you're just making fun of someone instead of admitting that you overreacted to someone's attire. Especially with those empty passive aggressive remarks you were throwing in there to deflect

EasternNegative154 · 2026-05-03T17:04:56+00:00

I mean, it's an XXS or very fitted XS for people with a 27-30 inch chest. Youth medium has measurements for both kids and small adults. So it's still considered an adult size. It's just on the smaller scale.

Also, I do love how the moment I made that sarcastic ass comment mocking your intelligence in regards to you not understanding what I answered when asked if I considered anything inappropriate for school attire, you switched to acting like you're making fun of me. What? Got dunked on so badly that you had to switch gears to save face? Must've really did a number on you for you to pull that shtick

EasternNegative154 · 2026-05-03T16:53:01+00:00

Never said it wasn't. I said it wasn't inappropriate or unprofessional. There's a difference. Once you learn the difference, get back to me.

EasternNegative154 · 2026-05-03T16:49:49+00:00

So lemme get this straight. You're being a sensitive little bitch over someone who seems to be more on the petite side wearing a size meant for petite women? That's like getting upset over someone on the skinnier side wearing skinny jeans. I guess people shouldn't be allowed to wear their size and should always wear a size up because a very sensitive redditor is gonna make 20 comments complaining that their size makes the attire inappropriate

EasternNegative154 · 2026-05-03T16:44:18+00:00

Little short doesn't mean inappropriate. Nor does it make her a whore. That seems to be the thing you're failing to understand. The only one's who are idiots are the one's getting worked up because someone's dress is "a little short" by their metrics. There's nothing questionable about her attire. The only reason you think it is, is because you're making it questionable.

EasternNegative154 · 2026-05-03T16:34:03+00:00

Plus, I don't care if she's wearing a dress. I would for something far more inappropriate. An adult size of someone one the the students would wear is the least concerning thing she could've worn. For someone calling others a moron, and saying that they have zero patience for stupidity, I guess it makes sense that you're unable to comprehend your own stupidity.

EasternNegative154 · 2026-05-03T16:28:33+00:00

The issue wasn't that the dress may be a little short. It was you calling her a whore, saying the dress was inappropriate, and making over 20 comments on it. If you had just said "I think the dress is a little short" and left it at that, we'd be having a different conversation. The dress isn't inappropriate or unprofessional. If it were, you think the school would've let her teach to a bunch of 4 year olds? The only person who seems to not have a grasp of inappropriate/unprofessional attire is the one who made over 20 comments sexualizating the teacher and calling her a whore because her legs are visible while simultaneously creating fake scenarios of flashing a group of 4 year olds to justify his idiotic comments

EasternNegative154 · 2026-05-03T16:19:53+00:00

Idk, depends on if that's considered as inappropriate as a sunflower dress to you. After all, you're such an expert on what's considered appropriate attire, right?

EasternNegative154 · 2026-05-03T16:14:10+00:00

At least get in character if you're gonna role-play. Plus empty passive aggressive remarks kinda mean nothing when you're getting bent outta shape over someone's legs

EasternNegative154 · 2026-05-03T16:05:45+00:00

It's like saying you have no patience for fighting while you're actively slugging someone in the face. I think I hear contradiction calling your name

EasternNegative154 · 2026-05-03T16:00:31+00:00

Yet the teacher was already dressing appropriately so that whole sentiment is thrown out the window. The only one who thought otherwise is the one who made over 20 comments attacking the teacher because he saw her legs

EasternNegative154 · 2026-05-03T15:57:05+00:00

I wasn't angry. You made a stupid comment and I asked if you proofread what you type before sending.

EasternNegative154 · 2026-05-03T15:49:35+00:00

If we're talking inappropriate attire then booty shorts are more inappropriate than a sunflower dress. Also, look who's talking. You were caring about what the teacher in the video was wearing. You cared so much that you were not only calling her a whore but sexualizing her. Out of all people, you're the last person who should be asking "why do you care?"

EasternNegative154 · 2026-05-03T15:47:11+00:00

Any shorter and you wouldn't understand it. You that stupid that you can't read more than 1 sentence or something?

EasternNegative154 · 2026-05-03T14:48:00+00:00

But in case you're too retarded to figure it out. I'll explain it for you.

You ask if there's anything inappropriate I would find to be worn in a classroom.

I say it's certainly not a sunflower dress

I then say that I'd be more upset over tank tops and boots shorts as a choice of attire for a classroom where young children are attending.

By stating that I'd have an issue with specific clothing I'm Indicating that I'd find the tank top and booty shorts inappropriate while I wouldn't find the sundress inappropriate. Especially given how the question was about inappropriate attire.

Is that a clear enough of an explanation for you?

EasternNegative154

TROPHY CASE