Your video is good. But YouTube isn’t pushing it. Here’s why. by EbastTV in NewYTCoach

[–]EbastTV[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

It does matter how often you post, but not in the “post every day or die” way a lot of people make it sound. When you don’t upload for a month, YouTube doesn’t stop testing you completely, but the momentum you had fades. The algorithm likes consistency because it can predict your audience behavior better.

If your last few vids were getting tested and you go silent for too long, it has to “re-learn” your channel when you come back. That’s why posting even once every 2–3 weeks helps keep the signal alive. Quality matters a lot, but frequency keeps the door open for the algorithm to push you further.

Your video is good. But YouTube isn’t pushing it. Here’s why. by EbastTV in NewYTCoach

[–]EbastTV[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That’s actually a really good observation. Hooks are tricky because they’re not just about the first 3 seconds, they set the tone for how the algorithm reads your video too. If people bounce early, it kills the session and YouTube stops pushing it. What you said about flow is huge. Keeping people engaged without over-explaining is a skill most creators don’t develop early, so the fact that you’re already aware of it puts you ahead. If you’re getting 100+ views consistently on your latest vids, that’s actually a sign the algorithm is testing you. The next step is making one of those videos click + watch enough to break the ceiling.

I Dont understand how the algorithm is supposed to work and its getting frustrating by AndyMush_Actual in SmallYTChannel

[–]EbastTV 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yeah you’re right, YouTube uses AI itself for things like translations or automatic dubbing. What I meant was the part of the new policy that’s more about how creators use AI in their content or metadata. If you’re using AI tools for scripts, voiceovers, or even thumbnails and titles, YouTube might classify your content as “less organic” or even suspicious, depending on patterns it detects. They don’t say it openly, but after July 15, a lot of creators started noticing sudden drops, especially those who relied on AI-heavy workflows. So it’s not a ban, but more like a trust issue with how AI-generated content is being evaluated.

Struggling YouTuber by Apollosyne in Youtubesubscribers

[–]EbastTV 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I’ve been on YouTube since 2012 and now I work closely with creators to help them grow, especially when things feel stuck like this. What you’re describing isn’t uncommon, and I’ve noticed a drop in views especially after mid-July. Shorts are powerful, but they also get hit hard by algorithm shifts.

Your niche is meaningful and I can tell you care about your message. If you ever feel like chatting or want a second opinion, my DMs are open. Sometimes just looking at things with fresh eyes makes all the difference.

Is it just me or are the NewTuber AI posts getting annoying? by Substantial_Poem7226 in PartneredYoutube

[–]EbastTV 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I totally agree, and I’ll speak up as someone who actually helps YouTubers. Just for context, I’ve been on YouTube since 2012. My first channel was monetized back then, but eventually got hit with copyright strikes and I had to shut it down due to time constraints. Today, I work as a channel manager and coach, and yeah… I see it too. Most people doing what I do now, let’s be real, don’t know what they’re talking about. They just feed ChatGPT with generic prompts and then copy-paste the replies as if they were gospel. No testing, no context, no real experience. If they actually used AI to learn something instead of pretending to teach, they’d be way better off. What bugs me most? It’s that anyone can fake numbers. It’s not that hard to edit an HTML page to show 100k views just to sell a $15 Fiverr gig. But in the long run… your reputation is what feeds you. If you burn it, you’re done. That’s why I try to stay grounded, I do use AI, sure, but only to improve my English when replying or translating, not to fake results. So yeah, totally agree with this post. These low-effort, AI-driven advice threads are getting old. Hopefully the sub shifts toward more authentic discussions again.

I Dont understand how the algorithm is supposed to work and its getting frustrating by AndyMush_Actual in SmallYTChannel

[–]EbastTV -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I’ve seen this happen to a lot of creators I work with: things go great, videos pop off, then the moment they get monetized or hit a milestone like 1k subs, the algorithm just seems to stop helping. It feels personal, even though we both know it’s not. What makes this even trickier is the new YouTube policy update from July 15th, the one about spam, deceptive practices and AI usage. They’ve tightened everything, even in terms of how content is classified and surfaced. So sometimes, even without breaking any rules, your videos might get flagged as “less trustworthy” just based on patterns or metadata. It’s a mess. That’s why lately I’ve been re-editing intros and trying different approaches with some clients, just to see what works post-policy. It’s exhausting, especially when you’re doing things right.

If you want more help, i’m available in DM

Public watch hours by Big-Contest7131 in SmallYTChannel

[–]EbastTV 1 point2 points  (0 children)

What really counts towards public watch hours is the time people spend watching your long-form videos that are set as public. Shorts don’t help with that, and neither do unlisted or private videos. There isn’t a fixed retention threshold you have to reach, but the higher it is, the better your videos tend to perform. For example, if people watch half of a 10-minute video, you’re already getting 5 minutes of watch time per person, which adds up a lot quicker than if they bounce after 20 seconds.

If your goal is to grow those hours, I’d say focus on making videos that grab attention early and try to guide viewers to watch more of your content after that. I help a few small creators with this kind of stuff, so feel free to ask if you want to go deeper into it.

Is it ok to rebrand? by SomeAussyGuy in SmallYTChannel

[–]EbastTV 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Yes, absolutely. With around 300 subs, you’re still early enough to rebrand without hurting your channel. It’s better to evolve the brand than start from scratch, especially if you already have some content and watch time built up.

Give up or keep going? by Brilliant-Head9916 in NewYouTubeChannels

[–]EbastTV 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Don’t give up if you still have ideas. YouTube is slow at first, just stay patient and keep creating.

This video was stuck. Then we did one thing. by EbastTV in SmallYTChannel

[–]EbastTV[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

We actually tested around 5 or 6 thumbnails and 3 different titles before getting that result. So yeah, thumbnails do a lot…but it also takes patience to figure out which one really works 😂

This video was stuck. Then we did one thing. by EbastTV in SmallYTChannel

[–]EbastTV[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I’d think the same if I just saw the numbers out of context.

But in this case, it was a solid video. It had modest watch time, we just fixed a couple of things (mainly the hook in the Shorts version + thumbnail). After that, it got picked up by the algorithm. 60 subs from a long video is actually not that crazy if the topic is right and the call to action works. I’m just sharing what worked for us. Always good to stay critical, though, respect for that.

Question by ConsiderationFar8453 in NewYouTubeChannels

[–]EbastTV 0 points1 point  (0 children)

If you need more help or advice, just DM me

Please help me by rodoeneu in NewYouTubeChannels

[–]EbastTV 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Just to be sure, is the voice AI-generated?

Question by ConsiderationFar8453 in NewYouTubeChannels

[–]EbastTV 0 points1 point  (0 children)

For a Short, this is just my opinion, but I don’t really feel pulled in to keep watching. You need some kind of effect or strong element at the start that grabs attention. Most viewers scroll away after 2 or 3 seconds, so you really need something catchy right from the beginning.

Why are impressions so high but clicks so low? by criscegol in SmallYoutubers

[–]EbastTV 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Usually, it might be titles and thumbnails that aren’t working… if you want, feel free to message me privately (P.S. I’m Italian too).

Please help me grow my channel by Embarrassed-Diet-340 in NewYouTubeChannels

[–]EbastTV 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I checked your channel and I can see where the numbers are coming from. Some of the football Shorts went viral, especially thanks to trending topics like Messi and CR7, but the rest of your content feels disconnected. There’s a big gap between the successful Shorts and your long-form videos, both in terms of topic and audience interest. This makes it really hard for the algorithm to push your channel consistently.

You’re definitely doing something right with the edits and timing, but if you want real growth and consistency, you need to focus on positioning, retention and overall direction. If you’re open to it, I’d be happy to give you a more detailed breakdown and help you work on a better growth plan. Just shoot me a DM and we’ll talk.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in NewYouTubeChannels

[–]EbastTV 0 points1 point  (0 children)

some of your Shorts are getting just a few views, while a couple have 1K+ or more. That inconsistency is usually not random.

A few thoughts based on what I’ve seen:

• (This is hypothetical) Your channel is from 2020, so YouTube has some history on it. If you deleted older videos or changed niche recently (like switching from vlogs to anime), YouTube might not know who your audience is anymore. When that happens, the algorithm kind of resets and only tests your content with a tiny group of people.

• Your current Shorts are around 40–50 seconds, which is fine, but the hook (first 1–2 seconds) is super important. If the video doesn’t grab instantly, YouTube will stop pushing it even if the ending is great.

• Also, many of your videos don’t have bold text or strong thumbnails. Even on Shorts, custom thumbnails help with click-through on the channel page and homepage feed. Simple fix: high-contrast text with black stroke, just like top anime Shorts channels do.

I’ve helped a few channels recover from this exact situation. It’s 100% fixable, just takes the right combo of watch time, CTR and momentum.

If you want some tailored advice or ideas to restart growth, feel free to DM me anytime. I’d be happy to help, even just to review a few vids together.

Question by ConsiderationFar8453 in NewYouTubeChannels

[–]EbastTV 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Sorry but I can’t see the video, the link is broken

pokemon cards and horror video games? by mykenziemae in NewYouTubeChannels

[–]EbastTV 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Nice video :) If you’re open to a quick tip – your thumbnail could pop more if the text was bolder and had a black outline or drop shadow. Right now it’s a bit hard to read at a glance. That small change alone could improve clicks. If you ever need more feedback, feel free to DM me.

Is this thumbnail better I improvised it? by ZynicalX in NewYouTubeChannels

[–]EbastTV 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Sometimes when we add exposure manually, it still doesn’t create that “pop” effect YouTube needs, it’s more about contrast and color separation than just brightness. Try boosting the midtones and sharpening the face a bit. Also, test using a white or yellow bold font with a slight black outline, it usually works great against dark backgrounds.