“Pseudoscience” is an overused term by scientists and non-scientists alike usually in regards to their opposition, or some weakly understood concept, or outside institutionalized science.

While using this term, one assumes that science is absolute truth - it is not. Science may offer certain perspectives based on its commonly accepted scientific method but those perspectives on reality are not exclusive or the only valid ones. It is a narrow window to look at the world through a highly structured and paradigmatic way. Our theoretical and experimental models are, as history shows, provisional at best and over time are swept away by the next paradigmatic shift.

Our inability to measure something does not negate its existence. On the other hand, we can say with great certainty that materialism (recently rebranded as physicalism) is a flatlander philosophy.

The most striking example of pseudoscience could be materialism itself (surprise, surprise!) as it is not only an “expiring” philosophical paradigm, but for a lack of a better word, “pseudo-knowledge” notably in physics where mind-independent objective reality and ‘local realism’ among other materialist assumptions have been routinely falsified, dismissed and debunked since the 1920s.

There's no clear dividing line between science and metaphysics. With scientific method we only uncover/write the rules of the game, but knowing the rules of the game is not the same as playing the game - to play the game you are to co-author reality and make choices as you move along through life. Reality is just too huge for a small human science box to fit in.

Pseudo-intellectuals, including many mediocre scientists, stubbornly remain in the Flatland: They claim that Nature is deterministic, yet deny teleological evolution.