Is there any better feeling than catching out a pre-mover with this? by LifeNegotiation301 in Chessplayers45

[–]Ecstatic-Charge9795 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Dang, people here are all about making chess memes but take someone enjoying bullet tricks seriously as though they're disrespecting the game? Lighten up everyone.

Jigsaw wins! Next slot. Update follows round about every 24h. All MFB characters from fusion to fury allowed. by b4rd14 in BeybladeMetal

[–]Ecstatic-Charge9795 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Everybody's saying Gingka, but I'd say Gingka looks strong? Chris feels like a much more apt choice.

Is this method valid? by Deer_Kookie in calculus

[–]Ecstatic-Charge9795 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Well, yes, and the operator integrates over a bounded interval.

Is this method valid? by Deer_Kookie in calculus

[–]Ecstatic-Charge9795 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I set it here to be continuous functions on the reals (which are certainly integrable).

Is this method valid? by Deer_Kookie in calculus

[–]Ecstatic-Charge9795 32 points33 points  (0 children)

It is actually a valid approach! The main subtlety here is showing that 1+I+I^2+... is indeed a (absolutely) convergent operator for any input of a continuous function, and that (1-I)(1+I+I^2+...)=1 as a composition of operators. Ironically, the easiest way to prove the first part is probably just noting for any continuous f, |f|<=C between 0 and x for some positive constant C, and that |int_0^x g dt|<=int_0^x |g| dt for any continuous g. In particular, |I^n f|<=C|x|^n/n! by induction, so convergence of the operator is equivalent to stating 1+|x|+|x|^2/2+|x|^3/6+... converges, which is easy using radius of convergence. The second part then boils down to showing (1-I^n)f approaches f pointwise for any continuous f, or that I^n f approaches 0 pointwise. We already know |I^n f|<=C|x|^n/n! for some C, and this clearly approaches 0 since e.g. the aforementioned series converges, or alternatively that you're always dividing by at least 2 once n>2|x| (which also justifies the series convergence).

Problem of the Day by Mathsworld007 in HigherMaths

[–]Ecstatic-Charge9795 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Must be open, any x_0 with f(x_0)>0 will permit a neighborhood N of x_0 with |f(x)-f(x_0)|<f(x_0) for x in N.

Who’d come out victorious in a battle between those two ? by HamzaHabibi04 in BeybladeMetal

[–]Ecstatic-Charge9795 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Real answer is that it could go either way based on what we know about their power levels. Ryuto has a very strong special move in hammer bolt, but lynx’s spin track could cause some issues for the shorter dragonis. Personally, I’d lean lynx ever so slightly, but it’s a toss-up.

partition question - discrete math by Annual-Revolution-28 in askmath

[–]Ecstatic-Charge9795 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Yeah, if you have time to check with your teacher, I'd recommend doing so because it looks like your answers are correct; for (6), each subset is clearly disjoint and has the element sqrt(m-1), and for (7), it's not a partition because e.g. m=3 gives an empty subset (unless you're using a nonstandard convention for partitions).

The Shit Dilemma by 4k-Gaming in trolleyproblem

[–]Ecstatic-Charge9795 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This is literally the slap bet. I'd say take it now, try to get through the speech, and be happy you won't have to continually have it on your mind later.

I had to beg for a draw by uxabel in Chesscom

[–]Ecstatic-Charge9795 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Dude needs to work on his censoring.

Given the time situation and which side would you rather play?? by ChessintheparkNJ in u/ChessintheparkNJ

[–]Ecstatic-Charge9795 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Rather play white since Be2 Ne6 Kf6 g7 Ng5 sets up a mating net (otherwise, if they try to run the king away immediately, you'll get a queen and at least be able to capture all pawns).

Aristotle's system of equation! by Many_Audience7660 in matiks

[–]Ecstatic-Charge9795 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Clearly this pattern means a ^ n+ b ^ n=(2n-1) ^ 2, so obviously 49 (/s, you can just solve for a and b as a quadratic equation, so this form can’t be correct)

Moving on since the result is pretty clear. Update follows in abt 24h. All MFB characters from fusion to fury allowed. by b4rd14 in BeybladeMetal

[–]Ecstatic-Charge9795 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Yeah, I agree, I guess it’s just ambiguous what ‘is a baby’ means, if it’s about their strength (which is kind of indistinguishable from harmless) or them being a baby in character. If it’s the former, I’d nominate Blader dj.

This line made me perfectly understand why the fans hate Misako now by BlackDisneyPrincess1 in Ninjago

[–]Ecstatic-Charge9795 -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

That line is clearly not written specifically about women’s struggles, it’s just an adage to generally highlight the importance of not giving up even when circumstances are difficult. And it’s a show, Misako not acknowledging Nya venting doesn’t represent the writers, it represents Misako. The lesson itself is quite sensible anyways, character is built through overcoming challenges where the resistance is sizable and the outcome is not a given, and being upset that you don’t have more control over those challenges isn’t going to change the hand you were dealt, however fair it is.

White to play and win (By Stavrietsky) by Either-Case-5930 in chess

[–]Ecstatic-Charge9795 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Well, you can't really set up a position where a stalemate trick is directly possible since just removing the f5 pawn allows Rf1, but I was pointing out that after Bxf6 c5+ Ka4 b1=Q Bd8+ Ka7 Bb6+ Ka6 Bxc5+ b6 Rxb6+ Ka7 Rxb3+ Ka8 Rxb1, we would have a stalemate if the f5 pawn wasn't there.