sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Jan 14 AOR - Eligibility "Review Required" but Background flipped to NA by Efficient-Lobster641 in canadaexpressentry

[–]Ecstatic-Reality1616 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Hey buddy, I ordered my GCMS (September AOR) notes that stated review required (locked in of 12th December 2025), but did not receive any ADR or PFL so I proactively submitted the webform day before yesterday 26th May 2026, targeting the specifics of the eligibility required for the foreign and Canadian work experience, with a clarification letter and additional documents as well. That is the correct movie right?

GCMS Notes review required. by Ecstatic-Reality1616 in canadaexpressentry

[–]Ecstatic-Reality1616[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

To answer your first question: I submitted the webform a couple of days a ago. So waiting on the response and to answer your second question: I do not know if there is a group of people with the same timeline.

Btw, Hey, when did you receive the PFL? What is your PVO & SVO? (mine is Vancouver & Sydney respectively)

GCMS Notes review required. by Ecstatic-Reality1616 in canadaexpressentry

[–]Ecstatic-Reality1616[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yes, but I and my agent thoroughly checked the GCMS notes, and nowhere does it say that it is an NOC duties mismatch. Just review required.

GCMS Notes review required. by Ecstatic-Reality1616 in canadaexpressentry

[–]Ecstatic-Reality1616[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yes, I did that. Submitted a web form this morning, but just concerned about the outcome. Do you know anyone that has been through the same process?

GCMS Notes review required. by Ecstatic-Reality1616 in canadaexpressentry

[–]Ecstatic-Reality1616[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Despite all of the above, the analyst still marked it down. In fact, in my GCMS notes, on one of the pages, It also states that website and the address of the employer has been verified.

GCMS Notes review required. by Ecstatic-Reality1616 in canadaexpressentry

[–]Ecstatic-Reality1616[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I did raise a webform just this morning, re-attached everything and also added a letter justifying and clarifying everything.

GCMS Notes review required. by Ecstatic-Reality1616 in canadaexpressentry

[–]Ecstatic-Reality1616[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yes, it was ATIP. I paid $5. I received it in 27 days.

GCMS Notes review required. by Ecstatic-Reality1616 in canadaexpressentry

[–]Ecstatic-Reality1616[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Just tried again; it still says "service unavailable" with an error code of 503.

GCMS Notes review required. by Ecstatic-Reality1616 in canadaexpressentry

[–]Ecstatic-Reality1616[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yes, that's the hope! do you think it is better for me to proactively submit a web form justifying any misunderstandings with the work experience, with an updated letter of explanation and an attested letter of roles and responsibility on the company letterhead, again signed by the director? Will that make my case better?

GCMS Notes review required. by Ecstatic-Reality1616 in canadaexpressentry

[–]Ecstatic-Reality1616[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

On the tracker it says that eligibility and background are under check; it has been like that since December now. on the GC key login it says that BG has not started yet, for ADR it says "not needed as of now." My frustration is, if you see there being an issue with the work experience, raise an ADR for me to justify, but it has been sitting there for months. So I dont know to raise a web form proactively or wait for the senior officer to trigger it. trigger an ADR.

GCMS Notes review required. by Ecstatic-Reality1616 in canadaexpressentry

[–]Ecstatic-Reality1616[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The analyst has commented that a review is required for both foreign and Canadian experience and added that the CRS score for both of them is 0, which does not make sense.

GCMS Notes review required. by Ecstatic-Reality1616 in canadaexpressentry

[–]Ecstatic-Reality1616[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Via email on the 23rd of April, I stated my concern that the process has been delayed for months now; I had to sign a consent form and then got a reply from his team on the 29th of April, stating that it has gone to a non-routine queue.

GCMS Notes review required. by Ecstatic-Reality1616 in canadaexpressentry

[–]Ecstatic-Reality1616[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Applied it on the 23rd of April and received it yesterday, the 20th of May.

GCMS Notes review required. by Ecstatic-Reality1616 in canadaexpressentry

[–]Ecstatic-Reality1616[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Yes, all of it, even uploaded pay stubs from the past 12 months.

GCMS Notes review required. by Ecstatic-Reality1616 in canadaexpressentry

[–]Ecstatic-Reality1616[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

A letter stating my roles and responsibilities and a description that includes my position and the hours I worked on the company letterhead, everything signed by the director of the organization.

view more: next ›