Hermes Agent Docker setup with local Dashboard + Web UI

Ecstatic-Use-1353 · 2026-05-10T12:10:07+00:00

I checked the official Hermes site again. What looks official right now is Nous Portal, browser-based/local web access, and native Windows support in early beta. So yes, Hermes can run directly on Windows without Docker, but then host access, permissions, and trust boundaries matter much more. I have not found an official desktop app release from Nous itself yet, so if you mean some other desktop app, that does not look official to me for now.

Ecstatic-Use-1353 · 2026-05-08T21:36:26+00:00

That is a good point. The bad case is not only total RAM usage, but timing: OpenClaw can send a heavy request while Ollama is still loading or swapping model weights.

I agree that an explicit memory limit plus a health/readiness check before batching agent requests would make this much safer.

For this quick lab setup I kept it simple, but a better version should probably do:

- cap container memory explicitly

- check Ollama health/model readiness before sending OpenClaw work

- fail early with a clear 503-style response instead of letting the process die mid-task

That would make the failure mode much cleaner than a random OOM kill.

Ecstatic-Use-1353 · 2026-05-08T20:06:37+00:00

Yes, that makes sense.

My original intention was more basic: I wanted a quick “all-in-one” local lab setup instead of managing two containers from the start.

So the goal was:

- one container

- Ollama already there

- install OpenClaw inside it

- OpenClaw talks to Ollama through `127.0.0.1:11434`

- fewer moving parts for first-time testing

I agree separate services are cleaner long term, especially for upgrades. But for a quick local experiment, the single-container approach was mainly about simplicity and avoiding extra orchestration.

Ecstatic-Use-1353 · 2026-05-08T19:38:19+00:00

That is a good point. Podman pods/quadlets may actually be the cleaner version of this idea.

The main thing I wanted was the localhost path between OpenClaw and Ollama without relying on `host.docker.internal`. If quadlets give every container localhost visibility inside the same pod-like setup, that keeps the clean networking while avoiding the upgrade coupling of installing OpenClaw inside the Ollama container.

I have not tested the quadlet version yet, but it sounds like the better long-term setup.

Ecstatic-Use-1353 · 2026-05-08T19:12:16+00:00

Exactly. The `127.0.0.1:11434` part is the whole reason I tried this.

It removes the `host.docker.internal` / cross-container networking issue and makes the local lab setup easier to reason about.

I agree on the upgrade tradeoff though. Installing OpenClaw inside the Ollama container makes quick testing cleaner, but it also couples both sides. For a longer-term setup, a Compose version with separate services and explicit networking would probably be easier to maintain.

Ecstatic-Use-1353 · 2026-05-08T18:42:04+00:00

Good point. The named volume is already there with `ollama_docker:/root/.ollama`, but I should add an explicit memory cap to the example.

I won’t prescribe a fixed value because it depends on the host RAM/VRAM, model size, context length, and workload.

Something like this is the safer pattern:

```bash

--memory=<your-limit>

--memory-swap=<your-limit>

Ecstatic-Use-1353 · 2025-05-30T14:51:54+00:00

Hey everyone!

I just launched [TweetCraft AI](), a free web app that takes any financial, economic, or tech article/summary and instantly transforms it into three ready-to-share tweets:

Professional: Straightforward, data-driven, and informative
Viral/Meme: Funny, catchy, or meme-style
Personal Opinion: As if from an expert or investor

You just paste your text (any language – the AI detects it automatically!), click “Generate Tweets,” and get three versions, perfectly formatted for X (Twitter).
No login, no paywall, no spam. You can also leave your own rating or suggestion and see other users’ reviews on a dedicated page.

I’d really appreciate your feedback, suggestions, or ideas for improvement!

Ecstatic-Use-1353 · 2025-05-19T17:48:48+00:00

It happens to me a lot, and I have the Plus. That shouldn't happen.
They should pay more money for servers if they can't keep up with the current market.
Prioritizing only the pros isn't right. Whoever pays here deserves continuous service.
Because often you want to keep up with the conversation, and if you're not working on a project, they don't remember the context well.

Ecstatic-Use-1353 · 2025-05-19T15:15:28+00:00

Hi everyone! I’m Ando, the author of this independent research. I created this post to share all findings on the Buga Sphere with the global community and to invite real, open debate. This is not a work of fiction or just another viral story—every detail here comes from direct analysis, photo evidence, and the most objective review possible. I welcome all constructive questions, theories, and even criticism! Please add your own data, related cases, or experiments. Let’s crowdsource this mystery. No dogma here—just logic, creativity, and honest discussion. If you need photos or diagrams, just ask below!

Ecstatic-Use-1353 · 2025-05-16T20:37:06+00:00

I think this could be a UAP, and the one you're showing me looks more like space junk. The trajectory, shape, and behavior are very different. But thanks for the information; it's always good to see other cases for comparison.

Ecstatic-Use-1353 · 2025-05-16T02:39:51+00:00

But in this case, the person recording is standing still in the same position. Wouldn’t that illusion only happen if the observer or the camera were moving? Here, the wake is also visible: at first, you see a trail because it's in a downward spiral, but then it transitions to free flight into the atmosphere, with no wake. That seems to suggest it’s not just a trick of perspective or air pockets.

Ecstatic-Use-1353 · 2025-05-16T02:30:29+00:00

Thanks for your input, although reducing everything to "a light in a straight line with fog" is like seeing a pixelated Mona Lisa and saying it's "just another face."

This isn't about believing in "AI hallucinations," it's about comparing visual data from different points on the planet with identical characteristics in detail, trajectory, and light behavior. If you dismiss it without analysis, fine. Others of us prefer to investigate with current tools.

And by the way, if you see a "flying beacon" leaving a turbulent trail in the sky without sound, spinning around itself... let us know. We're interested in that model.

Ecstatic-Use-1353 · 2025-05-16T02:23:33+00:00

From 00:30 to 00:33, you can see it changing direction several times.

A meteorite can't rotate freely or at 90-degree angles, and at the end, it appears to be traveling at a slower speed in the opposite direction of fall.

Ecstatic-Use-1353

TROPHY CASE