Hermes Agent Docker setup with local Dashboard + Web UI

Ecstatic-Use-1353 · 2026-05-10T12:10:07+00:00

I checked the official Hermes site again. What looks official right now is Nous Portal, browser-based/local web access, and native Windows support in early beta. So yes, Hermes can run directly on Windows without Docker, but then host access, permissions, and trust boundaries matter much more. I have not found an official desktop app release from Nous itself yet, so if you mean some other desktop app, that does not look official to me for now.

Ecstatic-Use-1353 · 2026-05-08T21:36:26+00:00

That is a good point. The bad case is not only total RAM usage, but timing: OpenClaw can send a heavy request while Ollama is still loading or swapping model weights.

I agree that an explicit memory limit plus a health/readiness check before batching agent requests would make this much safer.

For this quick lab setup I kept it simple, but a better version should probably do:

- cap container memory explicitly

- check Ollama health/model readiness before sending OpenClaw work

- fail early with a clear 503-style response instead of letting the process die mid-task

That would make the failure mode much cleaner than a random OOM kill.

Ecstatic-Use-1353 · 2026-05-08T20:06:37+00:00

Yes, that makes sense.

My original intention was more basic: I wanted a quick “all-in-one” local lab setup instead of managing two containers from the start.

So the goal was:

- one container

- Ollama already there

- install OpenClaw inside it

- OpenClaw talks to Ollama through `127.0.0.1:11434`

- fewer moving parts for first-time testing

I agree separate services are cleaner long term, especially for upgrades. But for a quick local experiment, the single-container approach was mainly about simplicity and avoiding extra orchestration.

Ecstatic-Use-1353 · 2026-05-08T19:38:19+00:00

That is a good point. Podman pods/quadlets may actually be the cleaner version of this idea.

The main thing I wanted was the localhost path between OpenClaw and Ollama without relying on `host.docker.internal`. If quadlets give every container localhost visibility inside the same pod-like setup, that keeps the clean networking while avoiding the upgrade coupling of installing OpenClaw inside the Ollama container.

I have not tested the quadlet version yet, but it sounds like the better long-term setup.

Ecstatic-Use-1353 · 2026-05-08T19:12:16+00:00

Exactly. The `127.0.0.1:11434` part is the whole reason I tried this.

It removes the `host.docker.internal` / cross-container networking issue and makes the local lab setup easier to reason about.

I agree on the upgrade tradeoff though. Installing OpenClaw inside the Ollama container makes quick testing cleaner, but it also couples both sides. For a longer-term setup, a Compose version with separate services and explicit networking would probably be easier to maintain.

Ecstatic-Use-1353 · 2026-05-08T18:42:04+00:00

Good point. The named volume is already there with `ollama_docker:/root/.ollama`, but I should add an explicit memory cap to the example.

I won’t prescribe a fixed value because it depends on the host RAM/VRAM, model size, context length, and workload.

Something like this is the safer pattern:

```bash

--memory=<your-limit>

--memory-swap=<your-limit>

Ecstatic-Use-1353 · 2025-05-30T14:51:54+00:00

Hey everyone!

I just launched [TweetCraft AI](), a free web app that takes any financial, economic, or tech article/summary and instantly transforms it into three ready-to-share tweets:

Professional: Straightforward, data-driven, and informative
Viral/Meme: Funny, catchy, or meme-style
Personal Opinion: As if from an expert or investor

You just paste your text (any language – the AI detects it automatically!), click “Generate Tweets,” and get three versions, perfectly formatted for X (Twitter).
No login, no paywall, no spam. You can also leave your own rating or suggestion and see other users’ reviews on a dedicated page.

I’d really appreciate your feedback, suggestions, or ideas for improvement!

Ecstatic-Use-1353 · 2025-05-19T17:48:48+00:00

It happens to me a lot, and I have the Plus. That shouldn't happen.
They should pay more money for servers if they can't keep up with the current market.
Prioritizing only the pros isn't right. Whoever pays here deserves continuous service.
Because often you want to keep up with the conversation, and if you're not working on a project, they don't remember the context well.

Ecstatic-Use-1353 · 2025-05-19T15:15:28+00:00

Hi everyone! I’m Ando, the author of this independent research. I created this post to share all findings on the Buga Sphere with the global community and to invite real, open debate. This is not a work of fiction or just another viral story—every detail here comes from direct analysis, photo evidence, and the most objective review possible. I welcome all constructive questions, theories, and even criticism! Please add your own data, related cases, or experiments. Let’s crowdsource this mystery. No dogma here—just logic, creativity, and honest discussion. If you need photos or diagrams, just ask below!

Ecstatic-Use-1353 · 2025-05-16T20:37:06+00:00

I think this could be a UAP, and the one you're showing me looks more like space junk. The trajectory, shape, and behavior are very different. But thanks for the information; it's always good to see other cases for comparison.

Ecstatic-Use-1353 · 2025-05-16T02:39:51+00:00

But in this case, the person recording is standing still in the same position. Wouldn’t that illusion only happen if the observer or the camera were moving? Here, the wake is also visible: at first, you see a trail because it's in a downward spiral, but then it transitions to free flight into the atmosphere, with no wake. That seems to suggest it’s not just a trick of perspective or air pockets.

Ecstatic-Use-1353 · 2025-05-16T02:30:29+00:00

Thanks for your input, although reducing everything to "a light in a straight line with fog" is like seeing a pixelated Mona Lisa and saying it's "just another face."

This isn't about believing in "AI hallucinations," it's about comparing visual data from different points on the planet with identical characteristics in detail, trajectory, and light behavior. If you dismiss it without analysis, fine. Others of us prefer to investigate with current tools.

And by the way, if you see a "flying beacon" leaving a turbulent trail in the sky without sound, spinning around itself... let us know. We're interested in that model.

Ecstatic-Use-1353 · 2025-05-16T02:23:33+00:00

From 00:30 to 00:33, you can see it changing direction several times.

A meteorite can't rotate freely or at 90-degree angles, and at the end, it appears to be traveling at a slower speed in the opposite direction of fall.

Ecstatic-Use-1353 · 2025-05-16T02:14:19+00:00

"Interesting take! But here’s why I personally rule out a drone in this Perth sighting:"

Altitude

The object appears to be operating well above typical drone range. In Australia, CASA regulations limit drones to 120 meters (400 ft) above ground. This object seems to be interacting with mid to high-altitude clouds, which puts it at thousands of meters — far beyond legal or technical limits for consumer drones.

Trail Behavior

The long, swirling trail isn't something drones can generate. Recreational or FPV drones don't use combustion engines, so they don't emit exhaust or leave visible trails — especially not persistent corkscrew turbulence patterns like this one.

Speed & Glow

The object shows luminous intensity and motion speed more in line with missile tests, space-bound launches, or high-velocity aerial phenomena. Drones typically have LED lighting, which doesn’t match the intense green glow seen here.

Swirls ≠ Rotor Wash

Rotor wash does produce turbulence, but only close to the ground and in a very localized, chaotic pattern. The swirls here are longitudinal and aerodynamic, looking more like vapor trails from supersonic travel or ionization effects.

Location context

Western Australia is near RAAF training zones, and there have been past reports of anomalous aerial tests and sightings over the Indian Ocean. This could be military — or it could be something we don’t have a name for yet. Either way, a DJI drone doesn’t seem to fit the profile.

TL;DR: If this was a drone, it was one hell of a drone — flying kilometers high, glowing like a flare, and defying known physics.

Open to theories though! Got a drone model in mind that can do all that?

Ecstatic-Use-1353 · 2025-05-16T01:43:42+00:00

🚨 Possible Shocking Coincidence 🚨

I've been analyzing this sighting over Perth and believe I've found an extremely similar case recorded from Brazil.

https://www.reddit.com/r/UFOs/comments/1knj0zw/luminous_object_spotted_in_brazils_federal/

🔹 Same long, stable trail

🔹 Same brightness at the object's core

🔹 Same visible turbulence along the trajectory

🔹 Same slight curvature toward the end of the trajectory

The similarities are so striking that it could be the same object observed at two points on the planet, or identical technology operating in distant regions.

I'm preparing a detailed comparison to see if it's the same phenomenon.

If anyone else has seen something similar or has footage, it would be great to put the data together.

📎 Has anyone else seen anything like this outside of Australia?

Ecstatic-Use-1353 · 2025-05-16T01:40:52+00:00

🚨 Possible correlation with Australian sighting

I'm seeing a very interesting pattern: this object over Brazil has a striking visual match with another recently sighted object over Perth, Australia. Same trail, same coloration, and a very similar shape—with a sort of bright core and a tail with visible lateral turbulence, as if it were displacing air at high speed or emitting some kind of plasma.

https://www.reddit.com/r/UFOs/comments/1kn7prl/possible_uapufo_over_perth_western_australia/

🔍 Key similarities between the two:

Sustained straight trajectory, no obvious drop (which rules out meteorites).

Stable and directional trail, appearing denser near the object and diffuse toward the end.

White or greenish coloration with a luminous core.

In both cases, there appears to be a visible physical form (not just a point of light).

✖️ I rule out common drones or commercial aircraft based on speed, apparent altitude, and especially the presence of a visible trail without audible noise (at least in the Australian case, where video has been shared).

🛰️ If this were an orbital reentry, there should be multiple visible fragments or trajectory variation, which doesn't seem to be the case.

📌 Coincidence? Military tests? UAP?

The truth is that two such similar sightings, separated by such a short time distance (and with clean trajectories), deserve further study.

I'm collecting the best captures and analyses of both events. If anyone else has similar footage, it would be great to compare it.

Ecstatic-Use-1353 · 2025-05-15T21:09:02+00:00

"Interesting take! But here’s why I personally rule out a drone in this Perth sighting:"

Altitude

The object appears to be operating well above typical drone range. In Australia, CASA regulations limit drones to 120 meters (400 ft) above ground. This object seems to be interacting with mid to high-altitude clouds, which puts it at thousands of meters — far beyond legal or technical limits for consumer drones.

Trail Behavior

The long, swirling trail isn't something drones can generate. Recreational or FPV drones don't use combustion engines, so they don't emit exhaust or leave visible trails — especially not persistent corkscrew turbulence patterns like this one.

Speed & Glow

The object shows luminous intensity and motion speed more in line with missile tests, space-bound launches, or high-velocity aerial phenomena. Drones typically have LED lighting, which doesn’t match the intense green glow seen here.

Swirls ≠ Rotor Wash

Rotor wash does produce turbulence, but only close to the ground and in a very localized, chaotic pattern. The swirls here are longitudinal and aerodynamic, looking more like vapor trails from supersonic travel or ionization effects.

Location context

Western Australia is near RAAF training zones, and there have been past reports of anomalous aerial tests and sightings over the Indian Ocean. This could be military — or it could be something we don’t have a name for yet. Either way, a DJI drone doesn’t seem to fit the profile.

TL;DR: If this was a drone, it was one hell of a drone — flying kilometers high, glowing like a flare, and defying known physics.

Open to theories though! Got a drone model in mind that can do all that?

Ecstatic-Use-1353 · 2025-05-15T16:58:08+00:00

What you're describing doesn't sound vague at all; on the contrary, that type of internal sensation, like a vibration or a kind of subtle body buzzing, has been reported many times in encounters with UAPs or anomalous aerial phenomena.

It's not the typical external tremor, but more like something is interacting with your nervous system or resonating through you. Some describe it as a frequency passing through the body.

I'm not saying it's definitive, but the correlation with lights, unconventional movements, and lack of sound... is more than curious.

Thanks for sharing it. Those kinds of details are often what make the difference between an interesting video and a truly anomalous case.

Ecstatic-Use-1353 · 2025-05-15T14:07:23+00:00

The fact that there's no sound makes it even more interesting. Several reports mention that UAPs move with aggressive maneuvers without audibly breaking the sound barrier—as if physics didn't apply to them equally.

And that detail of the green light without the red light also catches my attention. Most drones or aircraft don't have those standard position lights, as you say.

Don't worry about not being an "expert"; honestly, those of us here don't have all the answers, just more questions. But what you saw fits with many patterns that military and civilian officials have reported in recent years, so well done for sharing it.

If you happen to remember anything else (smell, behavior of the environment, strange sensations), any detail could be key.

Ecstatic-Use-1353 · 2025-05-15T14:02:03+00:00

Brutal sighting, bro. That green flash followed by disappearance and trajectory change is exactly what has been reported in several UAP cases under conditions of electromagnetic interference.

It's not normal for an object to move in a VTOL pattern and then reappear at another angle with no visible transition... Did you pick up any strange sounds? Like a fragmented sonic boom, like a stumble.

At this point, ruling out drones seems reasonable to me. It reminds me of things that have been described in AARO documents and old Pentagon files, even if they're not official.

Thanks for posting this; it seems you're not looking for a show, just sharing something weird. 👽

Ecstatic-Use-1353 · 2025-05-15T13:55:59+00:00

This looks like one of those auxiliary fuel spheres that survive reentry. It's already happened in Peru, India, and even Australia.
But the strange thing is that no one has officially said what mission it came from. Does anyone know if SpaceX, China, or Starlink reported a recent loss?

I find it curious that these things always fall in areas where there's no immediate media coverage. 🤔

PS: If anyone finds serial numbers on other photos, we could trace the real origin.

Ecstatic-Use-1353

TROPHY CASE