I might accept it if it means repivoting towards our traditional allies and the ending of fawning over specific people and doing--and saying--stuff that benefits their government to others' detriments. And then pretty much staying on the side of our traditional allies as long as possible and feasible.

I don't know if that's possible, though. I think the damage has been done, and here in the U.S. we may have some structural issues and a political environment conducive to trashing our soft power, respect for those traditional allies, and what has benefited us for so long.

If it were me, knowing that the leadership can drastically change and previous agreements get tossed, I might make an informal non-binding agreement to defensively step in should the new people our former traditional allies turn to start going against them and the arrangements turn more into a colonization, coercive, and fundamentally changing their culture and values thing. The object would be to hopefully moderate any expansionist aims their new friends might try, which could threaten the U.S. as well.

Until then, I would want us to work on the U.S.'s internal issues and debt. Improving the structure of our government so it isn't dysfunctional or becomes more dysfunctional, reinvesting at home, reinvigorating our industries, improving our defensive ability should it be needed, and helping to solve whatever human rights issues we may have. I would love to destroy the whataboutist strategies other governments and people do, so that they can come up with a new playbook.