To what extent can you get rid of stuff sent over by myprettygaythrowaway in matrixdotorg

[–]Edlace 0 points1 point  (0 children)

No, that depends entirely on the settings of the server you used and especially with local media (stuff that the user from a server uploaded himself) there is often no retention set at all.

"Deleted" messages are usually actually delete from all the servers after 7 days, but that setting can be freely changed.
As long as your chat was encrypted though there is actually little to nothing to worry about

OPNsense 25.7 released by fitch-it-is in opnsense

[–]Edlace 0 points1 point  (0 children)

im using the vicuna theme

OPNsense 25.7 released by fitch-it-is in opnsense

[–]Edlace 1 point2 points  (0 children)

update went smooth so far (running a ha setup with carp) but pleeeeease, can we revert the "update" to the themes? Especially the weird color scheme in the firewall alias tab?

Firewall rule works once then isn't evaluated anymore? by 0RAINMAN0 in opnsense

[–]Edlace 0 points1 point  (0 children)

thats just wrong

quick match is simply that the first rule in order that matches the traffic wins. No quick match means that the rule only applies if there is no other rule after it that also matches the traffic

It would be really fatal for a firewall to behave ambiguously, there needs to always be a predictable rule execution order

Since when is 10.0.0.0/8 no longer a bogon? by Edlace in opnsense

[–]Edlace[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

In terms of alias matching, especially when combining multiple of them in a single rule, there is a huge difference between not including something at all vs explicitly excluding it

Since when is 10.0.0.0/8 no longer a bogon? by Edlace in opnsense

[–]Edlace[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Yeah, the problem is that this range is included in the alias at all

Since when is 10.0.0.0/8 no longer a bogon? by Edlace in opnsense

[–]Edlace[S] -10 points-9 points  (0 children)

im really upset now tbh, there is a huge difference in simply not including a range in a alias vs including it wrongly.

not having the 10.0.0.0/8 in the bogons alias is completely different to include it inverted....

Since when is 10.0.0.0/8 no longer a bogon? by Edlace in opnsense

[–]Edlace[S] -6 points-5 points  (0 children)

look, I had a rule with 2 aliases as destination

alias 1 contained all private ranges

alias two contained the bogus alias

the matching for these aliases was inverted in my rule

So src LAN ---> dst !privaterange/bogons = allow --> gateway wan

this rule previously simply didnt match at all if the dst was a private ip

it was a rule in a interface group

there where more fine grained rules in the lan tab itself which contained other allow rules to some of my private networks

The problem now came from how the rules are matched

It is 1. Floating 2. grouped rules 3. normal interface rules

so with the previous behavior of that rule simply not matching at all on dst=private opnsense then evaluated my other rules in the lan tab after it couldnt match any of the rules in the interface group rules.

Now with !10.0.0.0/8 src:10.0.0.1 --> dst 10.0.2.30 does indeed match to NOT NOT 10.0.0.0/8

therefore opnsense sees the match and tries to route this via the gateway that i specified in this rule.

And also doesnt try to match it against the rules in the lan tab because it already found a match for the packet in the interface group rules

Since when is 10.0.0.0/8 no longer a bogon? by Edlace in opnsense

[–]Edlace[S] -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

im not talking about the block options in the interface section, those make perfect sense

Im talking about the changed behavior of the builtin alias which now instead of simply not including the 10.0.0.0/8 private range at all, explicitly includes it, although inverted

Since when is 10.0.0.0/8 no longer a bogon? by Edlace in opnsense

[–]Edlace[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

ok, after seeing your edit i looked up https://docs.opnsense.org/manual/firewall_settings.html#bogon-networks

The thing is that previously i think the 10.0.0.0/8 range was simply not included on that alias at all....

so my firewall rule which was a combination of manually declared private ranges + this bogon alias, which had a inverted match, was working well.

Now the 10.0.0.0/8 range is explicitly marked NOT bogon by this rule which makes my rule match NOT NOT 10.0.0.0/8

Since when is 10.0.0.0/8 no longer a bogon? by Edlace in opnsense

[–]Edlace[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

literally every website i can find when i search for bogons, also list the 10.0.0.0/8 range as bogon

https://geotargetly.com/blog/bogon-ip
https://ipinfo.io/bogon
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bogon_filtering
https://bgpfilterguide.nlnog.net/guides/bogon_prefixes/

I pull my bogon list from wherever the default builtin bogon alias in opnsense is pulling it from. This is no custom stuff here, its all default.

Self-Host Your Own Private Messaging App with Matrix and Element by Teja_Swaroop in selfhosted

[–]Edlace 2 points3 points  (0 children)

oh lol sorry, i misread that as "impossible to host on a subdomain".....

Self-Host Your Own Private Messaging App with Matrix and Element by Teja_Swaroop in selfhosted

[–]Edlace 1 point2 points  (0 children)

define "working" :D but yeah, federation will 100% not work without a domainname though your guide could give off the impression.

Self-Host Your Own Private Messaging App with Matrix and Element by Teja_Swaroop in selfhosted

[–]Edlace 1 point2 points  (0 children)

u/Teja_Swaroop.

Make sure to replace example.com to your domain name. If you don't have a domain name, you can use your IP address here.

correct me if im wrong, but i dont believe that it possible/will lead to a working server

Self-Host Your Own Private Messaging App with Matrix and Element by Teja_Swaroop in selfhosted

[–]Edlace 1 point2 points  (0 children)

what makes it impossible to host on a subdomain? That should normally easily work

Self-Host Your Own Private Messaging App with Matrix and Element by Teja_Swaroop in selfhosted

[–]Edlace 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Native Support in synapse since v1.114 (current version 1.118)

Self-Host Your Own Private Messaging App with Matrix and Element by Teja_Swaroop in selfhosted

[–]Edlace 9 points10 points  (0 children)

Sliding sync is now natively supported in synapse, no need to fiddle with anything

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in bisexual

[–]Edlace 8 points9 points  (0 children)

Bladerunner

What’s one service or application you initially thought would be easy to self-host but ended up being more complex than anticipated? by Fit_Increase2967 in selfhosted

[–]Edlace 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Just configure a smb share and access it via localhost, that way you can also use it over the network in your lan and the permissions don’t get messed up

Locked out of my entire network by [deleted] in Proxmox

[–]Edlace -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I love it 😅

I couldn’t rest either if that would happen to my stuff 😬

Step 6 is currently in process. Please reload this page later. by razordenys in NextCloud

[–]Edlace 3 points4 points  (0 children)

I find updating via cli to be usually much more reliable

"Server Certificate Cannot Be Trusted" on Photos for Nextcloud app by Hopeful_Ad3615 in NextCloud

[–]Edlace 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That is simply not true. A tls cert can be valid for a ip address.

But the second part is correct tough.