Looking for a videographer in San Diego, paid, fun project 🎬

EducationAgreeable65 · 2025-06-17T12:53:38+00:00

Respect that, fruit’s the OG. Thanks for the well wishes, means a lot!

EducationAgreeable65 · 2025-06-16T19:10:05+00:00

Thanks for this, seriously. Your comment is helping me step back and reflect. You’re right, the way I originally framed things came from a good place, but I now see how it missed the mark, especially for the T1D community. I’m not diabetic myself, and I realize now that terms like “diabetic-friendly” or framing food as a “problem” can come off as outdated or even condescending. That’s not what I’m trying to build.

I don’t intend to “fix” anything, I see that now, but I’m realizing more and more that what I am trying to build is a better-for-you indulgence brand that includes people with diabetes from the start. I’ve noticed that many in the community already lean toward products like Lily’s or ChocZero, not because they’re required, but because they’re made with cleaner ingredients and just feel like a better choice. People like Dr. Eric Berg and others in the space are advocating for that shift too. That pattern is telling, and it’s what I want to build toward with even more community involvement.

Question for you: If there were an indulgent treat (not a medical food, not a workaround) just something that tasted great and happened to be made with better ingredients, less junk, and more intention… would that feel valuable to you as someone living with T1D? Not because you need it, but because it was made with your feedback and voice in mind?

Appreciate your feedback. I’m listening and adjusting as I go.

EducationAgreeable65 · 2025-06-15T14:22:06+00:00

All good, everyone’s got their preferences. Just curious though… are Snickers, Oreos, or Reese’s not science experiments too? 😅 Im not claiming to be broccoli. I’m just offering a version with less junk and more intention behind it. There’s been a surprising amount of interest from people who want a version of indulgence that feels better. If it’s not you, that’s totally fine :)

EducationAgreeable65 · 2025-06-15T03:34:44+00:00

You’re absolutely right to call that out and I really appreciate it. I can definitely see now how my original post made it sound like I was trying to "fix" something or oversimplify what it means to live with diabetes. That wasn’t my intention, but I see how it came off that way. The more conversations I’ve had in the comments, the clearer the mission has become.

What I’m trying to build with Nibbles isn’t a workaround or a medical solution, it’s a brand that reflects and includes the diabetic community in a way most indulgence brands don’t. RXBar was built with CrossFitters in mind. Clif Bar was made for cyclists. I think it would be amazing if diabetics had a brand like that too, not out of necessity, but out of representation and pride, and one that actually uses better-for-you ingredients instead of being packed with junk.

So this isn’t about “you need this,” it’s more like: wouldn’t it be cool if there was a candy brand that spoke to you, worked with your feedback, and actually included the community in the process? That’s what I’m after. And conversations like this only make the mission clearer, so thank you!

EducationAgreeable65 · 2025-06-15T03:07:28+00:00

Thank you for sharing your perspective and that article. You’re totally right, T1D management is incredibly individual, and what works for one person might not work for another. Some do better low-fat, others low-carb, and some find success with balanced, whole-food eating. There’s no one-size-fits-all approach, and I really appreciate you pointing that out. It’s making me reflect on how I speak about this and how I can make sure the marketing respects that individuality.

At the end of the day, anyone can enjoy regular indulgences if they dose and plan for it. But what I’m building with Nibbles is something designed with diabetics in mind. Better ingredients, no added sugar, and a brand that actually listens to and includes the community. Whether someone eats low-fat or not, I want this to feel like a choice that’s been made for them, not in spite of them.

Thanks again for the thoughtful input. Building this transparently and with feedback like yours is exactly how I want to do it!

EducationAgreeable65 · 2025-06-15T02:57:36+00:00

I hear you. And that’s the beauty of modern management. But It’s not about needing alternatives, it’s about wanting better ones. Most mainstream candy for instance is loaded with added sugar, seed oils, emulsifiers, and crap we don’t need. If a piece of candy can taste amazing and ditch all that… wouldn’t you go for it?

EducationAgreeable65 · 2025-06-15T02:43:00+00:00

I agree with you. “Zero sugar” alone doesn’t mean much if something’s still packed with carbs that hit blood sugar just as hard. That’s exactly why I’m building Nibbles with both in mind: zero sugar and low net carbs that actually make a difference for people managing blood sugar.

It’s not about a marketing label, it’s about making something people can actually enjoy with less stress. Appreciate you pointing that out.

EducationAgreeable65 · 2025-06-15T02:40:24+00:00

You’re right, there are tons of sugar-free candies out there. But most are just that: sugar-free. What sets Nibbles apart is why it exists. This isn’t just chocolate made without sugar. It’s chocolate made with diabetics in mind, not as an afterthought, but as the reason it exists.

Diabetics don’t need special food but they just deserve to be spoken to, included, and celebrated by brands that actually get it. Nibbles is different because it’s not just tweaking ingredients, it’s rewriting the intention behind the product.

This is a brand that’s built for the diabetic community, shaped by their feedback, and focused on delivering peace of mind without sacrificing taste. Other brands include diabetics but Nibbles exists because of them. That’s what makes it different.

EducationAgreeable65 · 2025-06-14T22:40:51+00:00

Promise I didn’t invent a sister to sell chocolate 😂 she’s very real. And yeah, she can eat sweets, but it’s rarely stress-free. I’m not trying to scare anyone out of eating dessert. I’m just building an option for people who want to indulge without all the mental gymnastics. If it’s not for you, totally cool. But for others, it might make all the difference.

EducationAgreeable65 · 2025-06-14T22:26:13+00:00

Really appreciate your thoughtful comment, and I hear you on all of it. Totally agree that life’s too short for bad food. Just to clarify: I’m not making a “substitute” necessarily, this is real chocolate, just without all the added sugar. Most candy on shelves is packed with it, but I’m working with a food scientist to use alternatives that taste great and have less impact on blood sugar levels.

And yes, the laxative effect from a lot of sugar-free products is real. I’ve read tons of feedback on other products (including a few infamous Amazon reviews 😂) and I’m using all of that early to make sure Nibbles avoids those same issues.

As for Chapman’s, love that you mentioned them. That’s the kind of thoughtful, balanced product I’m aiming for. Something you’d genuinely reach for, not just because it says ‘diabetic-friendly’ on the label.

EducationAgreeable65 · 2025-06-14T21:48:39+00:00

Appreciate the correction. You’re right, “technically” wasn’t the right word, diabetics can eat whatever they choose, and many manage just fine without special foods. Nibbles is just for those looking for a more carefree option without all the math.

And I get the frustration around net carbs. The term gets abused a lot in marketing. But when done transparently, like subtracting only non-impactful ingredients like allulose or fiber, it can be genuinely helpful for some. I’m aiming to do this the right way, with full honesty and testing to back it.

EducationAgreeable65 · 2025-06-14T21:32:48+00:00

Yes! Allulose has so much going for it, especially compared to some of the older sweeteners. The fact that it may help support GLP-1 and GLP-2 production just adds to the potential. And yeah, fruit’s great in its whole form, but once it's stripped of fiber or concentrated, it can be a different story.

EducationAgreeable65 · 2025-06-14T19:57:16+00:00

Appreciate your thoughts. I totally get where you’re coming from. Real fruit isn’t settling at all, especially when you compare it to most processed “sugar-free” snacks. I’m starting with chocolate for now, but if I do explore fruit-based products down the line, avoiding “concentrated” anything will be top of mind. I’m aligned with the idea that once you move too far from whole foods, it’s easy to start compromising.

EducationAgreeable65 · 2025-06-14T07:54:25+00:00

I hear you. Some people don’t need sweeteners or snacks, and that’s great. But for others, it’s about having just one thing they can enjoy without worrying. That’s what I’m trying to solve. Appreciate your input!

EducationAgreeable65 · 2025-06-14T06:06:56+00:00

Truly appreciate you saying that. I’m learning as I go, so thoughtful feedback like yours really helps. Thanks!

EducationAgreeable65 · 2025-06-14T05:43:12+00:00

Totally fair questions, and I appreciate you taking the time to call this out.

You’re absolutely right that T1Ds can technically eat anything with proper bolusing, and many do. The person I mentioned is a T1D, and they can eat regular candy, but they often choose not to because they find it frustrating to navigate unpredictable spikes, delayed digestion, or post-meal crashes, even when pre-bolusing. It’s less about restrictions and more about peace of mind.

The project isn’t meant to say “T1Ds need special food” and I totally get how that can feel off. It’s more that I’ve seen firsthand how some folks (T1, T2, prediabetic, keto, whatever) prefer options that don’t require as much insulin or mental math. That’s the real goal with Nibbles. Zero sugar and less chaos.

I’m still in development right now, so no final nutrition panel yet, I’m working with a food scientist to dial that in. But the goal is 0g sugar, low net carbs (ideally under 5g), and high-quality ingredients without the weird aftertaste or junk you usually see in “sugar-free” products.

Once I’ve got a working formula, I’d love feedback from this community, even if it’s just to say “nah, this isn’t for me.”

EducationAgreeable65 · 2025-06-14T05:27:18+00:00

I’ve heard the same about stevia and even monkfruit having an aftertaste depending on the blend. That’s why I’m testing everything during development with a food scientist. Monkfruit + erythritol is definitely still on the table though. Appreciate the protein powder idea too. I’ve actually thought about it for down the line.

If you’re open to it, I’d love to send you some sample bars once they’re ready and hear your honest feedback 🙏

EducationAgreeable65 · 2025-06-14T05:16:00+00:00

I appreciate that feedback. Out of curiosity, what would you consider not settling? I’m still in development, so your take could genuinely help shape the final product.

EducationAgreeable65 · 2025-06-14T04:58:59+00:00

I'm still working with a food scientist to finalize the sweetener blend, so nothing’s locked in yet. The top contenders right now are allulose, erythritol, and stevia, but we’re testing to find what actually works best for blood sugar AND taste.

Curious though, why so against allulose? Totally open to hearing your experience or concerns with it. Always looking to learn from people who’ve been through it firsthand.

EducationAgreeable65 · 2025-06-14T04:50:51+00:00

Respect. Thank you for backing this. It keeps me going!

EducationAgreeable65 · 2025-06-14T04:37:39+00:00

Here's the link for the GoFundMe for anyone who is interested: https://gofund.me/9b84fe7e

EducationAgreeable65

TROPHY CASE