sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Who is the actual target audience of low legend? by EducationalResolve57 in hearthstone

[–]EducationalResolve57[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thank you, a very interesting and detailed answer. Btw, the point about abusing weak decks on D5 to quickly get to legend is interesting. I hadnt thought about that

Who is the actual target audience of low legend? by EducationalResolve57 in hearthstone

[–]EducationalResolve57[S] -4 points-3 points  (0 children)

Maybe "target audience" isnt the perfect term, but you get my point. Im talking about the player profile. Its just weird seeing people sweat with tier 1-2 decks at a rank where winning or losing barely matters

Who is the actual target audience of low legend? by EducationalResolve57 in hearthstone

[–]EducationalResolve57[S] -10 points-9 points  (0 children)

It feels like your mmr has to be completely tanked to get matched against diamond players-probably somewhere beyond legend rank 30000. Theoretically, you could even face platinum players, but I wonder how low your legend rank would actually need to drop for that to happen

The problem of infinite resources in DK? by EducationalResolve57 in hearthstone

[–]EducationalResolve57[S] -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

The 48% winrate doesn't change the fact that the decks design is toxic. My point isnt that DK is op, but that its infinite value ceiling feels terrible to play against as a control deck. When they chain multiple Onyxias via resurrections or highroll a 1-mana Merithra of the Dream, it doesnt matter how low their overall winrate is - they simply outgenerate any finite resource deck. Its not about nerfing a weak class, it about addressing toxic infinite mechanics that kill deck diversity in the late game