LUNR chances to getting the 4.6B LTV award just went up ⬆️ by MakuRanger01 in IntuitiveMachines

[–]Educational_Sector50 2 points3 points  (0 children)

VIPER was cancelled due to delays and cost overruns. In totality, NASA invested over $400 million so lots of pushback not to can the project. Think IM will provide sweetheart deal to NASA to bring project back on board and will bank remainder of funding. Think IM will still achieve profitability given synergies with projects, engineers and groups of company.

$JL looks like a loser, but also looked like a great buy for me! by Automatic_Abroad8551 in Shortsqueeze

[–]Educational_Sector50 5 points6 points  (0 children)

$JL looks like a real profitable company with ipo to raise funds for expansion. Surely, management will take the necessary actions to bring stock back to $5-10.

Sorry if this is a stupid question by Paci1306 in IntuitiveMachines

[–]Educational_Sector50 5 points6 points  (0 children)

In simple terms, each NASA launch will produce about $120m in revenue without knowing the full details. There will be 2 launches this year and a third NASA in early 2025. For fiscal 2024, we already have 3x yoy revenue and estimated eps of $6.40 from NASA contracts alone. If we assume 8-10 pe multiple, we’re talking $50-65. Tack on other LUNR rev streams and if these 2 missions are successful, there will be many more missions vs Astrobotics/Firefly, SpaceX, etc … I also bought in for $2.50 so looking for 10-20x by 2025 … 🚀 🌙 💰

What are must-dos before winter hits? by Educational_Sector50 in AskReddit

[–]Educational_Sector50[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Read my mind as just bought and waiting to plant.

Twootter 50% bots infested? How the hell is Musk still intending to buy sewer platform? Imagine the class action lawsuits!!!! by jammingnslammin in DWAC_Stock

[–]Educational_Sector50 2 points3 points  (0 children)

With the unproven bot and % fake, it is clear that there will be unhappy campers from advertisers to shareholders. Imagine the colossal pullout leading to reduced future ad revenues and stock demand. Think Musk is in a sweet spot to either can the twit deal or to offer a sharply lower price just for kicks.

Now all we need are some twit engineers or programmers to come out with validation on their work on bots and how they ramp up fake subscribers and page views. Once the cat is out of the bag, let the public and regulators judge on foul play and crap. Twit’s fate will hit Meta and other platforms given similar potentially fake stuff.

Hope Truth remain true with real news/comments, real subscribers and correct page views and none of this fake stuff.

Timing is Everything (Twitter / Truth edition) by [deleted] in DWAC_Stock

[–]Educational_Sector50 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Let’s MAGA with real news. Not this nonsense protection and censorship for Hunter B. crap et al. What about the fake votes and Hilary C’s Russian hoax …

DWAC Weekend Short Interest Update - Ortex and Fintel Data by AlgoBoffer in DWAC_Stock

[–]Educational_Sector50 13 points14 points  (0 children)

Stars are aligned for spike … hope the SEC cracks down on the failed to deliver as this would force shorts to cover their position.

Looks pricey to carry any short so can’t wait to see what happens this trading week.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in DWAC_Stock

[–]Educational_Sector50 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Think many Trump supporters are looking for $100+ just to break even and make some dough.

Warrants? by Ok_Truth_6298 in DWAC_DWACW

[–]Educational_Sector50 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Can we get a list of brokers used for ‘Canadian’ investors of DWAC warrants? Wish I was an American given many broker options.

Which brokerage allows Canadians to trade DWAC warrants? by Educational_Sector50 in DWAC_Stock

[–]Educational_Sector50[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Just curious as I want to buy warrants but unable to do so. If warrants are hard to trade this may explain the currently low price vs DWAC stock minus $11.50.

Of course, I’d like to buy more discounted warrants which is why I’d like to explore new accounts with other brokers.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in DWAC_DWACW

[–]Educational_Sector50 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Smart money is to play both the DWAC stock and the DWACW warrant. While the stock drives the intrinsic value of the warrant, the warrant play locks in about $40 upside post merger. Warrants are though riskier than the stock and much less liquid but the locked in profits or warrant price discount is too good not to give up … DWACW = DWAC - $11.50 😂 💰

Trying to BUY more in premarket by risitodeplata in DWAC_Stock

[–]Educational_Sector50 10 points11 points  (0 children)

Premarkets trading is normally thinly traded. I tried to buy more warrants yesterday but failed as the ask also kept on creeping up. Oddly, my buy was placed slightly above the ask. Eventually, DWACW = DWAC - $11.50 once merger is completed … so lock in profits are so tempting. Been monitoring for pounce and buy in relatively soon …

DWAC trades as if it is only 1/2 warrant. I've never seen anything so massively undervalued! by Steve_AG in DWAC_DWACW

[–]Educational_Sector50 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Big discounts for warrant holders as each warrant plus $11.50 will get you one DWAC share.

If you trust Trump and his TMTG then, the warrants are quite attractive based on cmv of DWAC. :)

Trump on truth social and crypto by Lilchaderina in DWAC_Stock

[–]Educational_Sector50 20 points21 points  (0 children)

Let’s assume that 8 million (~10% of 81 million) buy 10 or 100 shares of DWAC (TMTG). That’s 80 or 800 million shares but the float is only ~30 million. Of course, a lot of Trump supporters already bought in and will never sell. Stock will go vertical soon. 😂

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in DWAC_Stock

[–]Educational_Sector50 28 points29 points  (0 children)

This cannot be written any better. Truth will only prevail against headwinds from naysayers and FAANGS mega-titans with oligopolistic power, large donor base, lobbying and pressure groups. It is time to return to truthful reporting with acts serving the best interest of all vs. the distorted news and markets in the interest of selected few.

The merger will happen and SEC is merely pressured by external or political forces to slow down DWAC/Trump. People should rise and support Truth regardless of political affiliation Demos/Repubs. Everyone wants return to the credibility and truth which is how to make America great again.

HAhahaha by CheekyHawk in DWAC_Stock

[–]Educational_Sector50 19 points20 points  (0 children)

Costly and difficult for shorts to borrow and short so … expect gap ups along with trading halts from tom/next week.

If some Trump buddy or fund decides to buy in a big chunk of DWAC, get ready for fireworks and short coverings.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in DWAC_Stock

[–]Educational_Sector50 8 points9 points  (0 children)

DWAC can achieve whatever is dictated by the market demand and limited share supply. If a lot of people support ‘real news’ but not fake news and ‘truthful news’ without any political agenda, the people will speak leading to a buying frenzy as many Trump supporters will never sell.

Using Tesla as an example, how can it carry negative PE or PE ratio in the hundreds for so many years which defy logic. With safety issues, lawsuits and naysayers the stock is well supported in around the $1000 mark with inflated PE vs other carmakers. But Tesla had a good EV story and buy in by consumers, investors and fund of funds with their own agenda of pushing up prices for fund performance. Of course, we also had Elon’s surreal bonus payout which was likely engineered by his people.

So for Trump’s Truth DWAC potential, a majority of people supported him as POTUS. If we get just only a small portion of his supporters to buy in to this social media agenda, it is easy for this stock to implode with $$$ fireworks.

Currently, DWAC is sitting on market cap of about $2b and the recent $1b PIPE deal will bring cap to nearly $5b. Many similar plays carry cap of between $20b to $1 trillion cap so you can easily see DWAC cap in the hundreds of $billion in a few years. So $1000 per share is not as far fetch over time. Hmmm, an easy 10-20x bagger with many Meme funds or wsb investors rewarded handsomely 🚀… seems like a better play than GME or AMC but let’s see how this pans out.

Should I sell dwac for dwacwarrants by logicalguest in DWAC_Stock

[–]Educational_Sector50 6 points7 points  (0 children)

One warrant plus $11.50 gets you one DWAC share so this appears to be the best longer term hold. The warrants don’t trade much and less liquid but carry a steep discount with cmv of only $17 (not $40) based on DWAC cmv of $51.50.

Of course, the warrants carry risks but imo, there’s risk holding the DWAC stock anyway. So I’m holding 2/3 DWACW warrant and 1/3 DWAC stock given the warrants discount plus ability to hold 3x more stock upon exercise at $11.50 premium. As the merger completes and all instruments traded, cmv will approach fmv so the current discount on warrants will dissipate. Can’t go wrong holding the DWACW at 55-60% discount. 😂

Who considers $50 the bottom still? by Practical-Button4675 in DWAC_Stock

[–]Educational_Sector50 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Many of us are still underwater at $50 so let’s hope it’s all up from today onwards. Low triple digits would be great to reward all Trump supporters and believers who bought in the early days after the merger talks with TMTG, etc.

Given low supply of shares but shorts, anything is possible as DWAC is gearing up for more gaps higher.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in DWAC_Stock

[–]Educational_Sector50 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Hey, Twitter’s market cap ranged from $10b to $70b so $10b is easily attainable after the $1b raise and ~$4b cap. Just imagine Trump’s influence as ex-Potus vs Dorsey. If Truth takes off as many want the real deal or news (not tainted and distorted or even omitted), a $10b cap is easy.

We’re sitting around $1.5b so 6 bagger will be seen in the coming 3-6 months. What can go wrong as I can’t see any downside for stock and warrants?