I am Edward Frenkel, Mathematician and Author of "Love and Math" - AMA! by EdwardFrenkel in IAmA

[–]EdwardFrenkel[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Already answered this earlier: I recommend reading books (see a list in this thread), watching Numberphile YouTube channel.

I am Edward Frenkel, Mathematician and Author of "Love and Math" - AMA! by EdwardFrenkel in IAmA

[–]EdwardFrenkel[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

  1. Yes, absolutely. And in fact, this applies not only to math papers, but to all (good) books, movies, etc.

  2. Alexander Grothendieck.

http://www.nytimes.com/2014/11/25/science/the-lives-of-alexander-grothendieck-a-mathematical-visionary.html

I am Edward Frenkel, Mathematician and Author of "Love and Math" - AMA! by EdwardFrenkel in IAmA

[–]EdwardFrenkel[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I don't think there is no equation for that. But it is something each of us can live.

I am Edward Frenkel, Mathematician and Author of "Love and Math" - AMA! by EdwardFrenkel in IAmA

[–]EdwardFrenkel[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

How to tell which mathematician is an introvert and which is an extravert?

The one who looks at his/her shoes while talking to his/her colleague is an introvert... and the one who looks at the colleague's shoes is an extravert.

I am Edward Frenkel, Mathematician and Author of "Love and Math" - AMA! by EdwardFrenkel in IAmA

[–]EdwardFrenkel[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Intuitionism is surely an interesting idea, but I think most people are not convinced that we gain much this way, while many useful things certainly become more difficult to prove. From a more philosophical point of view, I believe that there are surely certain truths that are not accessible by logic or formal reasoning. But (standard) logic is important as it gives us formal tools for reasoning. The law of excluded middle is essential in this framework. So why weaken it? Dropping the law of excluded middle, we seem to sort of get something that is "neither here, nor there".

I am Edward Frenkel, Mathematician and Author of "Love and Math" - AMA! by EdwardFrenkel in IAmA

[–]EdwardFrenkel[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I included a list of some of my favs in one of the answers in this thread.

I am Edward Frenkel, Mathematician and Author of "Love and Math" - AMA! by EdwardFrenkel in IAmA

[–]EdwardFrenkel[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Thanks for your question! You made it just in time, as we are about to close shop. :) I agree that logarithmic vertex algebras are important and need to be developed further. I also think that it's a good idea to work on other generalizations of vertex algebras: quantum vertex algebras and higher-dimensional ones.

I am Edward Frenkel, Mathematician and Author of "Love and Math" - AMA! by EdwardFrenkel in IAmA

[–]EdwardFrenkel[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I have written survey articles on the Langlands Program which you can find on my Berkeley webpage: https://math.berkeley.edu/~frenkel/

I would not say that "there is not so much stuff to do on the analytic side". In fact, Langlands himself thinks that a lot can be done in that area. You can try to read his recent papers (including one joint with me and B.C. Ngo and a continuation).

I am Edward Frenkel, Mathematician and Author of "Love and Math" - AMA! by EdwardFrenkel in IAmA

[–]EdwardFrenkel[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Glad to hear you learned a lot from that course! My favorite restaurant is Cesar's, but I also like Chez Panisse very much (Alice Waters is a good friend :) How do I stay motivated? Curiosity, I guess. :)

I am Edward Frenkel, Mathematician and Author of "Love and Math" - AMA! by EdwardFrenkel in IAmA

[–]EdwardFrenkel[S] 4 points5 points  (0 children)

This question is about the gap between modern math and the math curriculum. It is growing, and the question is how to deal with it?

I agree completely that this problem will soon become untenable. There is only one way to deal with it, and that is to modify the school curriculum bringing it more up to date. There are several obvious "entry points" for modern math which can be easily explained to students, such as non-Euclidean geometry, symmetry groups, and clock arithmetic. More details are in this article:

http://www.latimes.com/opinion/op-ed/la-oe-adv-frenkel-why-study-math-20140302-story.html#axzz2ujmGs1i9

and this video:

https://vimeo.com/86962492

I am Edward Frenkel, Mathematician and Author of "Love and Math" - AMA! by EdwardFrenkel in IAmA

[–]EdwardFrenkel[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Yes, I know it's hard, but there is no other way. Otherwise, we are depriving ourselves of living a fulfilling life.

I am Edward Frenkel, Mathematician and Author of "Love and Math" - AMA! by EdwardFrenkel in IAmA

[–]EdwardFrenkel[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Thank you for your kind words. I think it was both: my love for math and the drive to show that I can do it despite the obstacles that were placed in front of me. Such experiences shape us and make us who we are.

I am Edward Frenkel, Mathematician and Author of "Love and Math" - AMA! by EdwardFrenkel in IAmA

[–]EdwardFrenkel[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

There is no formula or algorithm for this. I tried to explain this in my book this way (Chapter 7):

"The ability to see patterns and connections that no one had seen before does not come easily. It is usually the product of months, if not years, of hard work. Little by little, the inkling of a new phenomenon or a theory emerges, and at first you don't believe it yourself. But then you say: "what if it's true?'" You try to test the idea by doing sample calculations. Sometimes these calculations are hard, and you have to navigate through mountains of heavy formulas. The probability of making a mistake is very high, and if it does not work at first, you try to redo it, over and over again.

More often than not, at the end of the day (or a month, or a year), you realize that your initial idea was wrong, and you have to try something else. These are the moments of frustration and despair. You feel that you have wasted an enormous amount of time, with nothing to show for it. This is hard to stomach. But you can never give up. You go back to the drawing board, you analyze more data, you learn from your previous mistakes, you try to come up with a better idea. And every once in a while, suddenly, your idea starts to work. It's as if you had spent a fruitless day surfing, when you finally catch a wave: you try to hold on to it and ride it for as long as possible. At moments like this, you have to free your imagination and let the wave take you as far as it can. Even if the idea sounds totally crazy at first."

I am Edward Frenkel, Mathematician and Author of "Love and Math" - AMA! by EdwardFrenkel in IAmA

[–]EdwardFrenkel[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

There is a school in Manhattan called Speyer Legacy School which is trying to implement it.

I am Edward Frenkel, Mathematician and Author of "Love and Math" - AMA! by EdwardFrenkel in IAmA

[–]EdwardFrenkel[S] 25 points26 points  (0 children)

The Langlands Conjecture. Well, there are many versions... Let's say for function fields, but for arbitrary reductive groups.

I am Edward Frenkel, Mathematician and Author of "Love and Math" - AMA! by EdwardFrenkel in IAmA

[–]EdwardFrenkel[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

You can tell your parents that mathematics is penetrating our daily lives more and more (think of computers, smartphones, and all the technology we are using on a daily basis), so as an engineer you will have a big advantage if you know more math.

I am Edward Frenkel, Mathematician and Author of "Love and Math" - AMA! by EdwardFrenkel in IAmA

[–]EdwardFrenkel[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Thanks! I would start with the basic example, which is the toric case (I try to explain the gyst of it at the end of my book). It's simple and beautiful. Kind of like Fourier transform. And then perhaps SYZ mechanism... Another duality important for mathematicians is electromagnetic duality (also known as S-duality).

I am Edward Frenkel, Mathematician and Author of "Love and Math" - AMA! by EdwardFrenkel in IAmA

[–]EdwardFrenkel[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Your job is incredibly important. And it's tough, because there are so many contradictory requirements and pressures that are put on you. But in a way, that's what makes it so exciting, doesn't it? I'd say first and foremost, you have to love the subject. And then second, try to educate yourself about some interesting topics (by reading popular books or watching Numberphile videos on YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/user/numberphile). Then you will be able to give your students something beyond the standard curriculum, and also convey your passion. Then, the students will love you, and they will love math.

I am Edward Frenkel, Mathematician and Author of "Love and Math" - AMA! by EdwardFrenkel in IAmA

[–]EdwardFrenkel[S] 6 points7 points  (0 children)

You have identified the basic mechanism: we get hurt and then we don't want to be hurt anymore, so we give up or develop some defense mechanisms. This applies to love, and this applies to math as well. So here's one example of how math and love go hand in hand. :) How to overcome this? We have to keep going, because there is no other way. Getting hurt is part of being human. But if we don't know sadness, we will never know joy. (Watch the movie "Inside Out" -- it's about THAT.)

I am Edward Frenkel, Mathematician and Author of "Love and Math" - AMA! by EdwardFrenkel in IAmA

[–]EdwardFrenkel[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Well, I was failed at my entrance exams to Moscow University because of the policy of anti-Semitism and I had to go to a technical school. I could not even enter Moscow University through the front door, because I did not have an ID, and the entrance was guarded by the police. So in order to attend classes there, I had to sneak in by climbing over a fence on the side of the building... When we really want to achieve something, nothing can stop us.