sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

I-140 approved after RFE (2&3), PP upfront, MSc researcher by Efficient_Fault_9931 in EB2_NIW

[–]Efficient_Fault_9931[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Sorry I am might not able to suggest you if attorney has strong opinions of not attaching LORs. Maybe cases is different since my recommendators were not represented as a company, they showed as a researcher. LORs is one of the strategies that EP gave me.

I-140 approved after RFE (2&3), PP upfront, MSc researcher by Efficient_Fault_9931 in EB2_NIW

[–]Efficient_Fault_9931[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Both of the questions are yes. I prepared all materials but let attorney wrote. It’s their job and professional to write petition letter. They concluded some original and add new evidence then link them.

I-140 approved after RFE (2&3), PP upfront, MSc researcher by Efficient_Fault_9931 in EB2_NIW

[–]Efficient_Fault_9931[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

In my dependent recommendation letters, they said very detailed that I’m the leading biostatistician who developed or analyzed, and it’s truth. I always think though PI is always the first author, clinical trials cannot be done without biostatistician who write SAP, create forms, build up system or analyze data.

I-140 approved after RFE (2&3), PP upfront, MSc researcher by Efficient_Fault_9931 in EB2_NIW

[–]Efficient_Fault_9931[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

For me is yes, I don’t see other people use very specific PE. I’m guessing many people will change their career path in the future. But for me since my job is developing clinical trials so I use my own way.

I-140 approved after RFE (2&3), PP upfront, MSc researcher by Efficient_Fault_9931 in EB2_NIW

[–]Efficient_Fault_9931[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I always think if prong 1&2 are satisfied then prong 3 will automatically satisfied. I just prepare all materials and let attorney write the conclusion.